【摘要】：非法吸收公眾存款罪、集資詐騙罪作為非法集資犯罪主要的兩種犯罪類(lèi)型,兩罪的認(rèn)定區(qū)分堪稱(chēng)刑法理論界及實(shí)務(wù)界中"難啃的酸果"。司法實(shí)踐中,應(yīng)按以下步驟予以認(rèn)定:首先,分析客觀罪行構(gòu)成要件。結(jié)合"2010年解釋"第1、2條之規(guī)定,審查危害行為是否屬于列舉的10種應(yīng)以非法吸收公眾存款罪定罪處罰的具體情形,如不屬于,則綜合審查該行為是否同時(shí)具備"非法性"、"公開(kāi)性"、"利誘性"、"社會(huì)性"。其次,審查是否存在違法性阻卻事由,應(yīng)"將集資款主要用于生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)活動(dòng)"認(rèn)定為二罪的違法性阻卻事由,如查證屬實(shí),則危害行為不納入刑法規(guī)制范疇。第三,分析主觀罪責(zé)構(gòu)成要件。如果被告人供認(rèn)其具有非法占有的目的,則主觀狀態(tài)得以證明;如果被告人否認(rèn),則結(jié)合"2001年座談會(huì)紀(jì)要"第2部分關(guān)于金融詐騙罪第1條、"2010年解釋"第4條第2款(第1項(xiàng)除外)規(guī)定予以判斷。對(duì)于確因客觀原因無(wú)法查清集資款去向的,一般不認(rèn)定為具有非法占有的目的。
[Abstract]:The crime of illegally absorbing deposits from the public and the crime of fraud by raising funds are the two main types of crimes of illegal fund-raising. The identification and differentiation of the two crimes can be regarded as "hard fruit" in the field of criminal law theory and practice. In judicial practice, we should confirm the following steps: first, analyze the elements of objective crimes. In connection with the provisions of article 1, paragraph 2, of the 2010 interpretation, to examine whether the conduct of harm falls within the list of 10 specific circumstances punishable by the offence of illegal public deposit taking, if not, Whether the behavior is illegal, open, inductive and social. Secondly, to examine whether there is a reason for illegal obstruction, we should "mainly use the funds raised for production and management activities" as the reason of illegal obstruction. If it is proved to be true, the harmful behavior will not be included in the scope of criminal law regulation. Third, analyze the elements of subjective guilt. If the accused confesses that he has the purpose of illegal possession, the subjective state is proved; if the accused denies that, Then combined with the "2001 Symposium minutes" part 2 on the crime of financial fraud article 1, "2010 interpretation" article 4, paragraph 2 (except item 1) provisions to judge. For those who cannot find out where the money is due to objective reasons, it is generally not regarded as having the purpose of illegal possession.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)政法大學(xué)刑事司法學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 欒曉麗,劉新艷;論集資詐騙罪中“非法占有目的”的若干問(wèn)題[J];和田師范專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

2 邵芳;;論集資詐騙罪的認(rèn)定[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2008年04期

3 劉慧卓;王一民;;非法吸收公眾存款罪與集資詐騙罪的區(qū)別[J];人民司法;2010年12期

4 張建;俞小海;;集資詐騙罪對(duì)象研究中的認(rèn)識(shí)誤區(qū)及其辨正[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2011年06期

5 張建;俞小海;;集資詐騙罪對(duì)象研究中的認(rèn)識(shí)誤區(qū)及其辨正[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2011年09期

6 沈燕;;集資詐騙罪與詐騙罪的區(qū)別——如何理解集資詐騙行為的公開(kāi)性、社會(huì)性特征[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2012年S4期

7 陜報(bào);;集資詐騙罪有哪些特征[J];農(nóng)村新技術(shù);2012年09期

8 馮嘉敏;李q，

本文編號(hào)：2165484