【摘要】：芷刑法理論中,根據(jù)注意義務(wù)的不同可以將過失犯罪分為普通過失犯罪和業(yè)務(wù)過失犯罪。雖然有關(guān)普通過失犯罪的法條規(guī)定在《刑法》中所占數(shù)量不多,但由于其所涉及的范圍、主體等比較廣泛,因此對(duì)其注意義務(wù)的研究是必不可少的。 注意義務(wù)是認(rèn)定普通過失犯罪的核心規(guī)范要素,是普通過失犯罪的本質(zhì)。在認(rèn)定普通過失犯罪的注意義務(wù)時(shí)應(yīng)從兩方面著手：—、客觀的注意義務(wù)內(nèi)容；二、行為人的主觀注意能力。在普通過失犯罪中,行為人違反的是一般注意義務(wù),其來源具有廣泛性,為了不限縮人們的正常社會(huì)活動(dòng),對(duì)注意義務(wù)內(nèi)容的限定是必要的。同時(shí),作為注意義務(wù)的認(rèn)定基礎(chǔ),行為人的注意能力與違法性認(rèn)識(shí)可能性和刑法中的因果聯(lián)系有著天然的聯(lián)系,需要將三者同時(shí)考慮來全面分析行為人的注意能力。事物的兩面性決定了存在阻礙注意義務(wù)認(rèn)定的因素,即信賴原則。在適用信賴原則來否認(rèn)行為人注意義務(wù)的存在時(shí),要區(qū)分何為“信賴”、何為“信任”,不能將二者混淆,否則容易破壞人際之間的日常交往。如此,才能全面而清楚地分析普通過失犯罪中的注意義務(wù)問題。
[Abstract]:In the theory of criminal law, according to the difference of duty of care, negligent crime can be divided into common negligent crime and professional negligent crime. Although the provisions of the law on common negligence crime are not much in the Criminal Law, it is necessary to study its duty of care because of its extensive scope and subject. Duty of care is the core normative element of common negligence crime and the essence of common negligence crime. In determining the duty of care of common negligence crime, we should start from two aspects: -, objective content of duty of care; second, the subjective attention ability of the perpetrator. In the common negligence crime, the perpetrator violates the general duty of care, and its source is extensive. In order to limit people's normal social activities, it is necessary to limit the content of the duty of care. At the same time, as the basis of the recognition of duty of care, the attention ability of the perpetrator has a natural connection with the possibility of illegal cognition and the causal link in the criminal law, so it is necessary to comprehensively analyze the attention ability of the actor at the same time. The duality of things determines the existence of factors hindering the duty of care, that is, the principle of trust. When the principle of trust is applied to deny the existence of the duty of care of the perpetrator, we should distinguish what is "trust" and "trust". We should not confuse the two principles, otherwise, it is easy to destroy the daily communication between people. In this way, the duty of care in common negligence crime can be analyzed comprehensively and clearly.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 黃瑛琦;;信賴原則研究[J];刑法論叢;2009年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2159244