本文選題：酌定從重處罰情節(jié) + 罪刑法定原則��； 參考：《政法論壇》2016年06期

【摘要】：酌定從重處罰情節(jié)不僅在我國(guó)刑法理論上得到普遍承認(rèn),而且在司法活動(dòng)中被廣泛適用。刑法司法中廣泛適用酌定從重處罰情節(jié)的理由在于刑法立法的不明確。然而,適用酌定從重處罰情節(jié)不僅有違"法無明文規(guī)定不處罰",而且與法定從重處罰情節(jié)存在沖突,同時(shí)不符合量刑基準(zhǔn)的基本要求。案件社會(huì)學(xué)為酌定從重處罰情節(jié)的存在提供了理論依據(jù),也為其合理性劃定了界限。在法治社會(huì),"酌定從重處罰情節(jié)"的概念和邏輯應(yīng)當(dāng)被否定,但對(duì)其實(shí)際內(nèi)容應(yīng)依據(jù)并合主義的刑罰正當(dāng)化根據(jù)進(jìn)行取舍。
[Abstract]:The circumstance of discretionary heavier punishment is not only generally recognized in the theory of criminal law, but also widely used in judicial activities. The reason why the circumstance of heavier punishment is widely applied in criminal law is that the legislation of criminal law is not clear. However, the application of discretionary aggravating circumstances is not only contrary to "the law does not explicitly stipulate that no punishment", but also conflict with the statutory aggravating circumstances, and does not meet the basic requirements of sentencing criteria. The sociology of cases not only provides the theoretical basis for the existence of discretionary aggravating circumstances, but also delimits the limits of its reasonableness. In a society ruled by law, the concept and logic of "discretionary aggravating circumstances" should be negated, but the actual content should be chosen on the basis of the justification of the punishment of amalgamation.
【作者單位】： 河北大學(xué)政法學(xué)院暨河北大學(xué)國(guó)家治理法治化研究中心;
【分類號(hào)】：D924.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 肖福林 江西省贛州市中級(jí)人民法院;未成年前科不能作為后罪的酌定從重處罰情節(jié)[N];人民法院報(bào);2014年

2 記者 楊維漢;酒駕量刑酌定從重,逃逸則法定加重[N];新華每日電訊;2011年

3 江蘇省常州市中級(jí)人民法院 謝國(guó)勤 朱帥;喪失人性弒母行為屬酌定從重情節(jié)[N];人民法院報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 汪娟;酌定從重處罰情節(jié)研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1884017