發(fā)布時間：2018-05-13 13:57

  本文選題：挪用公款罪 + 主體��； 參考：《遼寧大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我國目前的職務犯罪類型之中,挪用公款罪是其中發(fā)生頻率較多的一種,這種犯罪行為不僅會破壞社會秩序、影響經(jīng)濟發(fā)展,還會侵害和影響我國當局政府在人民群眾中的威望,給國家的經(jīng)濟社會發(fā)展帶來無法估計的危害。本文主要是討論在司法實踐中在判定挪用公款罪方面所遇到的實踐難題,并且針對這些問題提出一些自己認為可以有效解決難題的辦法,希望能夠為我國一線的司法工作人員在處理挪用公款罪案件的過程中所遇到的司法難題有所貢獻。在認定某一具體案件是否屬于挪用公款罪的方面,不管是在具體的司法實踐中,還是在我們的立法過程之中,都存在著不同程度的爭議,刑法學理論界的專家也對這方面的問題進行了很多研究,但是由于在實踐中所發(fā)生的案件,案情都比較復雜、涉及人員較多,以致常常出現(xiàn)理論界不能預料的情形,于是在一線工作的司法人員對于挪用公款罪的認定方面提出了諸多的觀點。刑法學理論界的學者和在一線辦案的司法工作人員對于同一問題有的看法一致、相輔相成,有的則是截然相反、相互對立。但是無論是哪一種觀點,他們對自己看法的論證都非常的充分、有理有據(jù),這種“火花”四濺的現(xiàn)象對我國關于挪用公款罪的研究是一種非常好的契機。這篇論文在結構上主要由五個部分組成,首先在第一個部分以蔣某挪用公款案進一步展開,從而引出司法實踐中對于經(jīng)由國有企業(yè)聘任的管理人員是否屬于我國刑法所規(guī)定的挪用公款罪的適格主體這一問題的不同看法和探討,然后引出當前學界肯定說和否定說兩個代表觀點,并闡述了自己的看法,最后提出了解決該問題的途徑和方法;第二部分從王某擅自將非特定公物進行變賣,并且將變賣款予以挪用的案件引出將非特定公物予以變賣并將變賣款予以挪用的行為能否構成挪用公款罪;第三個部分是從楊某私自決定以單位名義將公款借予其妻控股企業(yè)使用的案件出發(fā),引出《人大“解釋”》中規(guī)定的“謀取個人利益”的內(nèi)涵和外延方面存在的問題;第四部分是以黃某與陳某挪用公款案引出的關于挪用公款的共犯方面存在的問題,即如何定性非公款使用人參與挪用公款這一犯罪活動的行為。最后一部分是以許某挪用公款進行賭博的案件引出挪用公款罪的牽連犯的處罰原則適用的問題,即應該適用數(shù)罪并罰原則還是應當適用從一重處斷原則。以上就是本文主要內(nèi)容概括,在此謹希望我們的法律建設更加完善,司法活動更加有法可依,促使我們的法治社會快速且平穩(wěn)地建成。
[Abstract]:Among the current types of job-related crimes in China, the crime of misappropriating public funds is one of the more frequent ones. This kind of crime will not only destroy the social order and affect economic development. It will also infringe upon and affect the prestige of our government among the people and bring incalculable harm to the country's economic and social development. This paper mainly discusses the practical problems encountered in judging the crime of misappropriation of public funds in judicial practice, and puts forward some effective solutions to these problems. The author hopes to contribute to the judicial problems encountered by the judicial staff in the course of dealing with the crime of misappropriation of public funds. In determining whether a specific case belongs to the crime of misappropriation of public funds, whether in specific judicial practice or in our legislative process, there are disputes of varying degrees. Experts in the theoretical field of criminal law have also carried out a lot of research on this aspect. However, due to the complexity of the cases that have occurred in practice and the large number of personnel involved, there are often unexpected situations in the theoretical circle. So the judicial personnel in the line of work on the crime of misappropriation of public funds put forward a lot of views. The scholars of criminal law theory and the judicial staff in the front line have the same views on the same problem, which complement each other, and some are opposite and opposite each other. However, no matter which point of view, their arguments on their own views are very sufficient and reasonable. This phenomenon of "sparks" is a very good opportunity for the study of the crime of embezzlement of public funds in our country. The structure of this paper is mainly composed of five parts. First of all, in the first part, the case of embezzlement of public funds by Jiang was further developed. It leads to different views and discussions on whether the managers employed by state-owned enterprises belong to the appropriate subject of the crime of misappropriating public funds under the criminal law of our country in the judicial practice. Then it leads to the two representative views of the current academic circles, affirmative and negative, and expounds their own views. Finally, it puts forward the ways and means to solve this problem. The second part is to sell off the non-specific public property without authorization from Wang Mou. And the case of misappropriating the sold money leads to the crime of misappropriating the public funds by selling the non-specific public property and misappropriating the sold funds; The third part starts from the case that Yang decided to lend public funds to his wife's holding enterprises in the name of the unit, leading to the problems in the connotation and extension of "seeking personal benefits" stipulated in the "interpretation" of the National people's Congress; The fourth part is based on Huang and Chen misappropriation of public funds led to the problem of the complicity of embezzlement, that is, how to characterize the use of non-public funds involved in the criminal activities of embezzlement of public funds. The last part is the application of the principle of punishment in the case of misappropriating public funds for gambling, that is, whether the principle of combining punishment for several crimes should be applied or the principle of breaking from a single point of view should be applied. The above is the main content of this paper summary, here I hope that our legal construction more perfect, judicial activities more legal, to promote our rule of law society quickly and smoothly built.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 張建升;阮齊林;張遠煌;張軍;張敬博;徐伯黎;;職務犯罪的刑罰與輕刑化的遏制[J];人民檢察;2010年17期

2 胡虎;黃恒學;胡海;;挪用公款罪客觀認定評述[J];西南民族大學學報(人文社科版);2009年06期

3 李杉杉;;挪用公款罪的牽連犯問題——以挪用公款罪與受賄罪相牽連為視角[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學院學報;2007年05期

4 趙有明;罪刑適當方能取得良好司法效果——職務犯罪緩刑、免予刑事處罰適用情況的調(diào)查分析[J];人民檢察;2005年18期

5 劉大元;挪用公款罪共犯研究[J];安徽教育學院學報;2003年05期

6 冒蓓蓓;試論挪用公款共同犯罪人的定罪[J];當代法學;2002年08期

7 王作富;挪用公款罪司法認定若干問題研究[J];政法論壇;2001年04期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 程蘭蘭;挪用型犯罪研究[D];華東政法大學;2009年

相關碩士學位論文 前8條

1 王偉坤;從三則案例探析挪用公款罪的疑難問題[D];蘭州大學;2013年

2 陶雷;挪用公款罪的解析與思考[D];華東政法大學;2010年

3 杜松林;論挪用公款罪犯罪構成[D];西南大學;2010年

4 董立巖;淺析“挪用公款歸個人使用”[D];中國政法大學;2010年

5 溫亞瓊;挪用公款罪的認定與立法完善的構想[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學;2008年

6 蔣俊;論我國刑法中的國家工作人員[D];西南政法大學;2007年

7 韓曉莉;論挪用公款罪[D];中國政法大學;2006年

8 趙琦婷;挪用公款歸個人使用問題研究[D];鄭州大學;2005年

，

本文編號：1883423