本文選題：刑法司法解釋 + 溯及力��； 參考：《上海師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑法司法解釋是我國刑事審判和裁定中的一項(xiàng)重要制度,是司法解釋的重要組成部分,它對(duì)于保障刑法典及其刑事法規(guī)的正確貫徹和實(shí)施起著非常重要的作用。然而其仍然存在著一些問題。我國目前的司法解釋存在著司法權(quán)入侵立法權(quán)、解釋主體矛盾、溯及力爭議等問題,這些問題的存在并不可因?yàn)樯鐣?huì)的發(fā)展而被忽視。十八屆四中全會(huì)重點(diǎn)在于依法治國,建設(shè)中國特色社會(huì)主義的法治國家,刑法實(shí)施是最具有代表性的法治表現(xiàn)之一,這些矛盾的存在已經(jīng)影響到了我國的法治建設(shè)。因此,構(gòu)建一個(gè)科學(xué)合理的解釋模式具有十分重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本文共四大部分,其主要內(nèi)容如下:第一部分,討論了刑法司法解釋的性質(zhì)與對(duì)象。性質(zhì)與對(duì)象對(duì)刑法司法解釋而言非常重要,將這些問題闡述清楚可以為下文解決問題打好基礎(chǔ)。并且筆者在這部分提出了與通說不同的觀點(diǎn),包括承認(rèn)刑法司法解釋的相對(duì)獨(dú)立性以及解釋的對(duì)象包含了法律文本與法律事實(shí)兩部分。第二部分,對(duì)刑法司法解釋的合法性與合理性進(jìn)行了闡述。本部分筆者從合法性與合理性兩個(gè)方面予以論述,解決刑法司法解釋存在可能性以及必要性的問題,是研究刑法司法解釋的必要基礎(chǔ)部分。第三部分,重點(diǎn)闡述刑法司法解釋存在的問題。主要分析了司法權(quán)入侵立法權(quán)以及刑法司法解釋溯及力的問題。探究了其具體表現(xiàn)、產(chǎn)生的原因以及專家學(xué)者的觀點(diǎn),加以筆者自己的一些看法。第四部分,針對(duì)我國國情提出的完善建議。對(duì)現(xiàn)行刑法司法解釋的完善建議,筆者認(rèn)為不能一蹴而就,需要分階段進(jìn)行。筆者分別從短期以及長期兩個(gè)階段提出了建議,立足我國司法解釋的體制,適當(dāng)引入西方判例法官解釋體制,再結(jié)合一些司法體制自身的改革,希望能對(duì)我國現(xiàn)行刑法司法解釋的完善有所裨益。
[Abstract]:Judicial interpretation of criminal law is an important system in criminal trial and adjudication in China. It is an important part of judicial interpretation. It plays a very important role in ensuring the correct implementation and enforcement of criminal code and its criminal laws and regulations. However, there are still some problems. There are some problems in the judicial interpretation in our country, such as the judicial power invading the legislative power, explaining the contradiction of the main body, retroactive controversy and so on. The existence of these problems can not be ignored because of the development of the society. The focus of the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee is to run the country according to law and build a socialist country ruled by law with Chinese characteristics. The implementation of criminal law is one of the most representative manifestations of the rule of law. The existence of these contradictions has affected the construction of the rule of law in our country. Therefore, the construction of a scientific and reasonable interpretation model has a very important practical significance. The main contents of this paper are as follows: the first part discusses the nature and object of judicial interpretation of criminal law. Nature and object are very important to the judicial interpretation of criminal law. In this part, the author puts forward different views, including the recognition of the relative independence of the judicial interpretation of criminal law and the object of interpretation, including the legal text and legal facts. The second part expounds the legality and rationality of the judicial interpretation of criminal law. In this part, the author discusses from the aspects of legality and rationality, and solves the problems of the possibility and necessity of judicial interpretation of criminal law, which is the necessary foundation of the study of judicial interpretation of criminal law. The third part focuses on the problems existing in the judicial interpretation of criminal law. This paper mainly analyzes the retroactive effect of judicial power invading legislative power and judicial interpretation of criminal law. This paper probes into its concrete performance, causes and the viewpoints of experts and scholars, and puts forward some views of the author himself. The fourth part, according to the situation of our country puts forward the perfect suggestion. The author thinks that the judicial interpretation of the current criminal law can not be accomplished overnight, but should be carried out in stages. Based on the system of judicial interpretation in our country, the author puts forward some suggestions from the short and long periods, introducing the system of judicial interpretation of western precedent judges, and combining with the reform of some judicial system itself. It is hoped that it will be beneficial to the perfection of the judicial interpretation of the current criminal law in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D924

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 李志增;;刑法司法解釋的效力性質(zhì)初探[J];法律學(xué)習(xí)與研究;1990年05期

2 黃瑞敏;;試論刑法解釋權(quán)的改革[J];嶺南學(xué)刊;2010年04期

3 陳金釗;司法過程中的法律發(fā)現(xiàn)[J];中國法學(xué);2002年01期

4 梁根林;罪刑法定視域中的刑法適用解釋[J];中國法學(xué);2004年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉雪峰;我國刑法司法解釋若干問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

2 曾琳;我國刑法司法解釋權(quán)配置模式評(píng)判與重構(gòu)[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1880830