本文選題：敲詐勒索罪 + 詐騙罪�。� 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：盜竊罪、詐騙罪及敲詐勒索罪是司法實(shí)踐中發(fā)案率較高的財(cái)產(chǎn)性犯罪，三個(gè)罪均為自然人犯罪，主觀均為故意，且以非法占有為目的，均侵犯了公民或單位的公私財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益。在客觀方面，三個(gè)罪的危害行為分別表現(xiàn)為盜竊行為、詐騙行為及敲詐勒索行為。在司法實(shí)踐中，典型的盜竊罪、詐騙罪及敲詐勒索罪是比較容易區(qū)分的，但在一些疑難復(fù)雜案件中，盜竊行為、詐騙行為與敲詐勒索行為往往糾結(jié)在一起，讓人難以辨清其“真面目”。筆者以王某、馬某侵財(cái)案引出相關(guān)理論問題，，深入比較了盜竊罪、詐騙罪以及敲詐勒索罪在犯罪構(gòu)成要件上的本質(zhì)區(qū)別，并著重分析恐嚇行為與處分行為，力圖厘清本案定性爭議與疑難之處。本文分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分：基本案情介紹。由案由、案情簡介、分歧意見、爭議焦點(diǎn)四個(gè)部分構(gòu)成。 第二部分：相關(guān)問題的法理分析。對(duì)本案涉及的相關(guān)理論問題進(jìn)行論述，重點(diǎn)對(duì)盜竊罪、詐騙罪與敲詐勒索罪犯罪構(gòu)成客觀要件的理解和認(rèn)定進(jìn)行研究，聚焦國內(nèi)外學(xué)者的觀點(diǎn)，并提出筆者自己的看法。 第三部分：本案的結(jié)論。運(yùn)用前文所述理論知識(shí)對(duì)本案展開分析，并結(jié)合相關(guān)法律規(guī)定，得出合理結(jié)論。 第四部分：本案的研究啟示。主要對(duì)此類型的案件的定性做總結(jié)歸納，以期望為司法實(shí)踐中處理此類案件提供參考。
[Abstract]:Larceny, fraud and extortion are property crimes with high incidence in judicial practice. The three crimes are all natural persons' crimes, and the subjective crimes are all intentional, and for the purpose of illegal possession, they all violate the public and private property rights and interests of citizens or units. Objectively speaking, the three crimes of harm act are theft, fraud and extortion. In judicial practice, the typical crimes of theft, fraud and extortion are relatively easy to distinguish, but in some difficult and complex cases, theft, fraud and extortion are often entangled together. It is difficult to discern its true face. Based on the case of Wang Mou and Ma Mou, the author makes a deep comparison of the essential differences between the crime of larceny, fraud and extortion in the elements of crime, and emphatically analyzes the behavior of intimidation and punishment. Try to clarify the qualitative disputes and difficulties in this case. This paper is divided into four parts: Part I: introduction of the basic facts. It consists of four parts: the subject of the case, the brief of the case, the different opinions, and the focus of the dispute. The second part: the legal analysis of related problems. This paper discusses the relevant theoretical issues involved in this case, focuses on the understanding and identification of the objective elements of the crime of theft, fraud and extortion, focuses on the views of domestic and foreign scholars, and puts forward my own views. The third part: the conclusion of the case. Using the theoretical knowledge mentioned above, the author analyzes the case and draws a reasonable conclusion by combining the relevant laws and regulations. The fourth part: the research enlightenment of this case. This paper summarizes the nature of this type of cases in order to provide a reference for the judicial practice in dealing with such cases.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 董玉庭;盜竊罪特殊對(duì)象問題研究[J];長春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年01期

2 張明楷;財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益是詐騙罪的對(duì)象[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

3 齊文遠(yuǎn),張克文;對(duì)盜竊罪客體要件的再探討[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2000年01期

4 張明楷;;盜竊與搶奪的界限[J];法學(xué)家;2006年02期

5 劉明祥;論詐騙罪中的交付財(cái)產(chǎn)行為[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年02期

6 蔣九久;;論詐騙罪的處分行為[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年01期

7 柳葉;;“處分”視角下盜竊罪與詐騙罪的界分[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

8 張明楷;論三角詐騙[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年02期

9 楊炯;張健;李明;徐彪;張志勇;李霓;張仲瑋;;嚇走竊賊并占有贓物的行為應(yīng)如何處理[J];人民檢察;2007年06期

本文編號(hào)：1798376