本文選題：精神病人犯罪 + 強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療��； 參考：《貴州民族大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷發(fā)展，精神衛(wèi)生問(wèn)題越來(lái)越受到公眾的關(guān)注，一系列的精神病人司法案件對(duì)社會(huì)的影響，也引發(fā)我們的深思，新刑事訴訟法加入精神病人刑事強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療這一特殊程序，是我國(guó)強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療制度發(fā)展的一個(gè)新的階段。最高院、最高法也相應(yīng)的出臺(tái)了相關(guān)的司法解釋?zhuān)梢?jiàn)，我國(guó)強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療制度基本形成了一個(gè)較為完備的雛形，保證了公安機(jī)關(guān)能夠依據(jù)法律的規(guī)定處理相關(guān)的案件。但是精神病人強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療程序已經(jīng)適用一年多，越來(lái)越多的問(wèn)題也逐漸顯現(xiàn)，因?yàn)槭鞘状稳肼桑�，所以在相關(guān)法律程序的制定上難免存在諸多不足，為此，眾多學(xué)者表示擔(dān)憂(yōu)，如何保障該弱勢(shì)群體的利益不可不察。截至目前，最高人民法院以及最高人民檢察院已經(jīng)對(duì)相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的理解、適用制定了司法解釋?zhuān)橇⒎ㄕ咭啻嬖诜芍贫ㄖ械摹坝邢蘩硇浴�，存在�?duì)相關(guān)問(wèn)題的理解有偏差，或者是滯后于社會(huì)實(shí)際，從而造成了在司法解釋之中存在諸多不盡如人意之處，紕漏難免。有鑒于此，筆者認(rèn)為，實(shí)有必要立足于新修訂的《刑事訴訟法》第五編第四章“依法不負(fù)刑事責(zé)任的精神病人的強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療程序”之規(guī)定，結(jié)合司法機(jī)關(guān)之司法實(shí)踐，透之以理論剖析，對(duì)依法不負(fù)刑事責(zé)任的精神病人的強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療程序的適用進(jìn)行研究，從而保障刑事強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療措施能夠得到正確的實(shí)施，實(shí)現(xiàn)保障精神病人人權(quán)和社會(huì)防衛(wèi)、正義的目的。筆者從理論出發(fā)，概括性的剖析了精神病人強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療程序在適用中存在的問(wèn)題，重點(diǎn)總結(jié)了解決適用中存在問(wèn)題的合理建議，主要包括適用范圍、鑒定程序、審判程序、配套保障、權(quán)利救濟(jì)等方面。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of the market economy, mental health problems have been paid more and more attention to by the public. A series of judicial cases of mental patients have had an impact on the society, which has also aroused our deep thinking. The new criminal procedure law is a new stage in the development of compulsory medical treatment system in China. The Supreme Court and the Supreme Law have also issued relevant judicial explanations. It can be seen that China's compulsory medical system has basically formed a relatively complete embryonic form, ensuring that the public security organs can deal with relevant cases according to the provisions of the law. However, compulsory medical procedures for mental patients have been applied for more than a year, and more and more problems have gradually emerged. As this is the first time to enter the law, there are inevitably many deficiencies in the formulation of relevant legal procedures. For this reason, many scholars have expressed concern. How to protect the interests of this vulnerable group can not be ignored. Up to now, the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate have formulated judicial interpretations on the understanding of relevant laws and regulations, but legislators also have "limited rationality" in the formulation of laws. There are some deviations in the understanding of related problems, or lag behind the social reality, which results in many unsatisfactory points in the judicial interpretation, which is unavoidable. In view of this, the author believes that it is necessary to base on the provisions of Chapter 4 of title 5 of the newly revised Criminal procedure Law, "compulsory medical procedures for mental patients who are not criminally liable according to law", and to combine the judicial practice with the judicial organs. Through theoretical analysis, this paper studies the application of compulsory medical procedures for mental patients who are not criminally responsible according to law, so as to ensure that the criminal compulsory medical measures can be correctly implemented, and realize the protection of the human rights and social defense of mental patients. The purpose of justice. Based on the theory, the author analyzes the problems existing in the application of compulsory medical procedure for mental patients, and summarizes the reasonable suggestions for solving the problems in application, including the scope of application, appraisal procedure, trial procedure, and so on. Supporting protection, right relief and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2;D924

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙海軍;萬(wàn)可;;精神病人犯罪后處置的探討[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

2 李娜玲;;刑事強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療程序適用對(duì)象之研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年10期

3 陳衛(wèi)東;程雷;;司法精神病鑒定基本問(wèn)題研究[J];法學(xué)研究;2012年01期

4 周?chē)?guó)君;李娜玲;;試論我國(guó)刑事強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療措施的司法化[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

5 馬長(zhǎng)鎖;常林;胡澤卿;;《精神衛(wèi)生法(草案)》淺析——以司法鑒定為視角[J];中國(guó)司法鑒定;2011年04期

6 張步峰;;強(qiáng)制治療精神疾病患者的程序法研究——基于國(guó)內(nèi)六部地方性法規(guī)的實(shí)證分析[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2010年04期

7 葉肖華;;論我國(guó)刑事強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療程序之建構(gòu)與完善[J];浙江工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

8 李偉;;精神病人刑事強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療制度研究[J];中州學(xué)刊;2012年03期

9 張玲;張旭;;論精神病人社會(huì)管控[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2012年05期

10 陳慧君;王沁荔;;精神病人的社區(qū)治安防控[J];武漢公安干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

本文編號(hào)：1798192