本文選題：雇傭犯罪 + 刑事責(zé)任�。� 參考：《河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為一種高發(fā)的犯罪類型，雇傭犯罪有著深刻的歷史淵源與時(shí)代背景。我國(guó)當(dāng)今社會(huì)正處于歷史轉(zhuǎn)型期，社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)、價(jià)值觀念、文化形態(tài)等面臨深刻變革，人民內(nèi)部矛盾凸顯，各種勞資沖突、名利爭(zhēng)斗、經(jīng)濟(jì)糾紛、婚戀矛盾增多，受金錢萬(wàn)能、拜金主義等腐朽思想的影響，“有了錢，什么都能做”的錯(cuò)誤觀念在不少人的心理重新扎根，加之社會(huì)道德滑坡，個(gè)人罪惡感差，逃脫法律制裁的僥幸心理作祟，使雇傭者鋌而走險(xiǎn)采取這種極端的方式來(lái)解決糾紛，而另一方面，隨著社會(huì)貧富差距的拉大，兩極分化嚴(yán)重，導(dǎo)致一部分人心理失衡為了錢什么都敢做，這樣就形成了雇傭犯罪中的“買方市場(chǎng)”與“賣方市場(chǎng)”，導(dǎo)致該類犯罪層出不窮、屢見(jiàn)報(bào)端。 與日益猖獗的雇傭犯罪現(xiàn)象相比，我國(guó)對(duì)雇傭犯罪的研究還極度落后，理論界甚至就雇傭犯罪概念、特征、性質(zhì)這些基本問(wèn)題還存在爭(zhēng)論，就更別說(shuō)形成強(qiáng)有力的完整的統(tǒng)一的理論體系，我國(guó)的刑法以及司法解釋更是沒(méi)有對(duì)雇傭犯罪有只言片語(yǔ)的涉及，，這就導(dǎo)致在處理雇傭犯罪案件時(shí)，適用刑法的不統(tǒng)一，有損法律尊嚴(yán)和司法權(quán)威。 本文由五部分構(gòu)成，除前言和后記外，正文分為三部分： 第一部分，雇傭犯罪概述。考察了雇傭犯罪的歷史沿革；通過(guò)分析、比較其他學(xué)者的觀點(diǎn)，得出筆者對(duì)雇傭犯罪概念的理解，雇傭犯罪是指雇傭者為實(shí)現(xiàn)自己的犯罪意圖，通過(guò)支付傭金的方式，要求被雇傭者單獨(dú)實(shí)施或要求被雇傭者與自己一起實(shí)施刑法分則所規(guī)定的構(gòu)成要件行為的的犯罪形式。筆者認(rèn)為，雇傭犯罪區(qū)別于其他犯罪最主要的特征在于其非法交易性，即雇傭者以金錢或其他財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益購(gòu)買被雇傭者的犯罪行為，雇傭者從中獲利或者使自己從中得到某種心理等方面的滿足，而被雇傭者以收取傭金為目的不參與對(duì)犯罪利益的分成。 第二部分，雇傭犯罪與共同犯罪的關(guān)系。探討了共同犯罪人的分類，把雇傭犯罪與正犯、教唆犯、組織犯、幫助犯等概念進(jìn)行了比較，理順了雇傭犯罪與共同犯罪的關(guān)系，并分析了獨(dú)立使用雇傭犯罪這一概念的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義、理論意義以及刑法規(guī)定雇傭犯罪的困境。筆者認(rèn)為，研究雇傭犯罪的刑事責(zé)任必須建立在分工分類法的基礎(chǔ)上，只有這樣才能準(zhǔn)確認(rèn)定雇傭者與被雇傭者在雇傭犯罪中扮演的角色，從而反映出其在雇傭犯罪中所起的作用與地位。 第三部分，雇傭犯罪的刑事責(zé)任認(rèn)定。筆者以一起涉及實(shí)行過(guò)限的雇兇傷害案為切入點(diǎn)，探討了認(rèn)定雇傭者與被雇傭者刑事責(zé)任時(shí)應(yīng)堅(jiān)持的一般原則，實(shí)行過(guò)限的判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及雇傭犯罪中各犯罪人刑事責(zé)任認(rèn)定的途徑。
[Abstract]:As a type of crime with high incidence, employment crime has profound historical origin and historical background.Our society is in the period of historical transformation, the social economic structure, the value concept, the cultural form and so on face the profound transformation, the people internal contradiction prominent, each kind of labor and capital conflict, the fame and fortune struggle, the economic dispute, the marriage and love contradiction increases,Influenced by decadent ideas such as money omnipotence and money worship, the misconception that "with money, you can do anything" has taken root again in the psychology of many people. In addition, social morality has declined, personal guilt has been poor, and the lucky psychology of escaping legal sanctions has been haunted.Employers are desperate to take this extreme approach to resolving disputes. On the other hand, as the gap between the rich and the poor widens, the polarization becomes so serious that some people lose their minds and dare to do anything for the sake of money.In this way, the buyer's market and the seller's market are formed in the employment crime.Compared with the increasingly rampant phenomenon of employment crime, the study of employment crime in our country is still extremely backward, the theoretical circle even on the concept of employment crime, characteristics, nature of these basic issues are still controversial.Not to mention the formation of a strong and complete unified theoretical system, the criminal law and judicial interpretation of our country do not have a single word of reference to the employment crime, which leads to the inconsistent application of the criminal law when dealing with the employment crime cases.Undermine the dignity of the law and the authority of the judiciary.This paper consists of five parts, except preface and postscript, the text is divided into three parts:The first part is an overview of employment crime.By analyzing and comparing the views of other scholars, the author comes to the author's understanding of the concept of employment crime, which refers to the way that the employer pays commissions to realize his criminal intention.A form of crime that requires an employed person to commit, alone or with himself, the constitutive elements of a criminal law.The author thinks that the main characteristic of the employment crime is its illegal transaction, that is, the employer buys the hired person with money or other property interests, the most important characteristic of which is that the employment crime is different from other crimes.The employer profited from it or obtained some psychological satisfaction from it, while the employed person did not participate in the sharing of criminal benefits for the purpose of collecting commission.The second part is the relationship between employment crime and joint crime.This paper discusses the classification of joint offenders, compares the concepts of employment crime with principal offender, abettor, organized crime and aiding crime, and straightens out the relationship between employment crime and joint crime.It also analyzes the practical significance of the concept of independent employment crime, the theoretical significance and the predicament of the employment crime stipulated in the criminal law.The author believes that the study of criminal liability of employment crime must be based on the division of labor classification, only in this way can the role of the employer and the employed in the employment crime be accurately identified.Thus reflecting its role and position in the employment crime.The third part, the criminal liability determination of employment crime.Based on a case involving excessive limitation of employment injury, the author discusses the general principles that should be adhered to when determining the criminal liability of the employer and the employed person.The judgment standard of excessive limit and the way of criminal responsibility confirmation in employment crime are put into practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D914

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳偉強(qiáng);;雇傭共同犯罪刑事責(zé)任分析綱要[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2012年02期

2 周光權(quán);;造意不為首[J];人民檢察;2010年23期

3 譚建華;;論雇傭犯罪特點(diǎn)[J];江西公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

4 趙秉志;何榮功;;雇兇殺人案件中的死刑適用問(wèn)題研究[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2010年09期

5 胡溫榮;;雇傭犯罪問(wèn)題研究[J];知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年12期

6 朱妍;;論雇傭犯罪的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];湖北成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

7 閻二鵬;陳廣秀;;教唆犯屬性的邏輯認(rèn)定——兼論對(duì)我國(guó)刑法中教唆犯“二重性”說(shuō)之評(píng)判及反思[J];寧波大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2008年06期

8 支起來(lái),鮑華民;雇傭犯罪刑事責(zé)任研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2005年06期

9 文穎豐;論雇傭犯罪概念[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2005年04期

10 張勇,趙永柯;雇傭犯罪新探[J];河南公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 李自剛;雇傭犯罪問(wèn)題研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2012年

2 肖偉光;“雇兇殺人”案件的刑事責(zé)任認(rèn)定研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

3 劉琪;論雇傭犯罪的刑事責(zé)任[D];華東政法大學(xué);2007年

4 裴永勝;雇傭犯罪研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2006年

本文編號(hào)：1749592