本文選題：虛假訴訟罪 + 《刑法修正案（九）》��； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,虛假訴訟案件在我國很多地區(qū)大量出現(xiàn),不但嚴(yán)重侵犯了他人的合法權(quán)益,而且對司法秩序的正常有序運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)也帶來極大危害。但針對這一行為,在《刑法修正案(九)》頒布之前,并無一個(gè)明確的規(guī)定予以規(guī)范,多以民事處罰為主,各地司法實(shí)踐做法也不盡相同。近幾年,雖然也有對虛假訴訟的刑事判例出現(xiàn),但防范和打擊效果并不明顯。為適應(yīng)時(shí)代發(fā)展和司法實(shí)踐需要,2015年8月29日通過的《刑法修正案(九)》在條文中明確增設(shè)了虛假訴訟罪,這必將對遏制虛假訴訟行為的日益泛濫起到巨大的促進(jìn)作用。由于該罪名新立,學(xué)界理論分析尚不透徹,司法實(shí)踐中新問題、新情況層出不窮,實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)仍然缺乏。為增加對新罪名的理解和把握,筆者將從對虛假訴訟行為的界定入手,來探討虛假訴訟罪在司法適用中存在的問.題,并提出一些自己的完善建議。文章將從以下四個(gè)部分對虛假訴訟罪進(jìn)行全面探討:在對虛假訴訟的含義及與相關(guān)聯(lián)概念進(jìn)行比較的基礎(chǔ)上,對虛假訴訟行為作一明確界定;然后重點(diǎn)對我國有關(guān)虛假訴訟立法現(xiàn)狀及法律適用問題進(jìn)行分析,指出虛假訴訟罪立法上存在的不足,并對該條文在司法實(shí)踐的使用進(jìn)行探討與思考,進(jìn)一步增加對該行為的認(rèn)識(shí)和了解;第三、四部分則是通過介紹國外相關(guān)規(guī)定,對我國虛假訴訟行為的防范從立法完善及其他司法機(jī)制上給予筆者自己的思考和建議。希望通過本文的寫作,歸納總結(jié)現(xiàn)有的研究成果,提出在實(shí)際工作中對虛假訴訟罪適用時(shí)存在的困惑和思考,從理論上厘清該罪名的適用范圍、適用對象,同時(shí)為完善其相關(guān)規(guī)定提供一些可行性的建議,以期能更好的服務(wù)司法,打擊犯罪。
[Abstract]:In recent years, a large number of false litigation cases appear in many areas of our country, which not only seriously infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of others, but also brings great harm to the normal and orderly operation of judicial order.However, before the promulgation of the Criminal Law Amendment (9), there is not a clear stipulation to regulate this behavior, most of which are mainly civil punishment, and the judicial practice is different from each other.In recent years, although there are criminal precedents on false litigation, the effect of prevention and strike is not obvious.In order to adapt to the development of the times and the needs of judicial practice, the Criminal Law Amendment (9), adopted on August 29, 2015, explicitly added the crime of false litigation, which will certainly play a great role in curbing the proliferation of false litigation.Due to the new charge, the theoretical analysis of academic circles is not thorough, new problems and new situations emerge in judicial practice, and practical experience is still lacking.In order to increase the understanding and grasp of the new charges, the author will start with the definition of false litigation behavior, to explore the existence of false litigation in the judicial application.Question, and put forward some of their own suggestions for improvement.The article will discuss the crime of false litigation from the following four parts: on the basis of the comparison of the meaning of false litigation and related concepts, the author makes a clear definition of false litigation;Then it analyzes the current situation of the legislation and the application of the law, points out the shortcomings in the legislation of the crime of false litigation, and probes into and ponders over the use of this provision in the judicial practice.Further increase the understanding and understanding of this act; third, the fourth part is through the introduction of foreign relevant provisions, the prevention of false litigation acts in China from the legislative improvement and other judicial mechanisms to give my own thoughts and suggestions.Through the writing of this article, I hope to sum up the existing research results, put forward the confusion and thinking when the crime of false litigation is applicable in the actual work, and clarify the scope of application and the applicable object of the crime in theory.At the same time, it provides some feasible suggestions for improving its relevant regulations, in order to better serve the judiciary and combat crime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 行江;張亦然;;虛假訴訟罪的理解與適用[J];河南警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期

2 王志祥;劉婷;;虛假訴訟罪:概念界定與學(xué)理分析[J];南陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年01期

3 何婷;;虛假訴訟罪的司法適用問題研究[J];法制博覽;2016年03期

4 郭莉;;虛假訴訟犯罪的理解與適用[J];中國檢察官;2016年01期

5 洪錫雷;;《刑法修正案(九)(草案)》第33條“虛假訴訟罪”的解讀[J];福建警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年04期

6 劉藝靈;;虛假訴訟的刑事法律應(yīng)對解析[J];泉州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

7 鐘蔚莉;胡昌明;王煜玨;;關(guān)于審判監(jiān)督程序中發(fā)現(xiàn)的虛假訴訟的調(diào)研報(bào)告[J];法律適用;2008年06期

8 李翔,黃京平;論訴訟欺詐的可罰性及其立法完善[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2004年06期

9 張曉薇;濫用訴訟權(quán)利之比較研究[J];比較法研究;2004年04期

10 陳桂明,李仕春;訴訟欺詐及其法律控制[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 劉干;郝曉東;;此借名起訴是否構(gòu)成虛假訴訟[N];人民法院報(bào);2016年

2 ;法院喊打 讓虛假訴訟無處藏身[N];人民法院報(bào);2008年

，

本文編號：1745721