本文選題：罪刑法定主義　切入點：明確性原則　出處：《重慶大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：罪刑法定原則作為刑法的基本原則，它在刑事法治領(lǐng)域占有重要的地位，本文以罪刑法定主義的基本內(nèi)涵與精神為主線，聯(lián)系我國當(dāng)前的法治建設(shè)現(xiàn)狀，歸結(jié)出罪刑法定主義在我國法制運行中的困境及其原因，通過研究學(xué)習(xí)兩大法系的法律制度，結(jié)合我國的政治法律環(huán)境提出了具有針對性的一些對策。 本文的正文部分主要包括五個方面。 第一部分，引言首先指出了本文的寫作背景，即“國家尊重和保障人權(quán)”已經(jīng)寫入憲法，然后，點出了本文的寫作目的，即實現(xiàn)罪刑法定原則保障人權(quán)的目的。 第二部分，主要介紹了罪刑法定原則的中國困境。從罪刑法定原則的明確性要求、確定性要求和實體的適當(dāng)原則三個方面詳細(xì)分析了罪刑法定原則在刑事法治中的缺憾，，即罪刑法定原則的本土困境。 第三部分，主要是對罪刑法定原則中國困境的原因進(jìn)行了條理性分析。在刑事法治中缺乏保障罪刑法定原則健康運行的配套制度是造成中國困境的基本原因；罪刑法定原則的明確性要求與刑法體系的開放性之間存在矛盾是導(dǎo)致中國困境的技術(shù)原因；對罪刑法定原則的內(nèi)涵和精神的誤讀是造成中國困境的最重要原因。 第四部分，主要是針對上述問題提出了罪刑法定原則中國困境的對策。首先，要樹立罪刑法定原則的新理念，努力實現(xiàn)刑事法治；其次，在司法實踐中要充分發(fā)揮法官的主觀能動性，即實行刑罰個別化和建立以法官為主的刑法解釋機(jī)制；最后，建議在我國構(gòu)建刑事判例制度，以解決罪刑法定原則的明確性困境。 第五部分，主要是對罪刑法定原則中國困境的認(rèn)識與思考。
[Abstract]:As the basic principle of criminal law, the principle of legality of a crime occupies an important position in the field of criminal law. This paper, taking the basic connotation and spirit of legality of crime as the main line, links the current situation of the construction of the rule of law in our country. By studying the legal system of the two legal systems and combining with the political and legal environment of our country, this paper puts forward some countermeasures. The text of this paper mainly includes five aspects. In the first part, the foreword points out the writing background of this article, that is, "the state respects and protects human rights", and then points out the writing purpose of this article, that is, to realize the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime to protect human rights. The second part mainly introduces the Chinese predicament of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime, and analyzes in detail the defects of the principle of legality of a specified crime in the criminal law from three aspects: the requirement of clarity, the requirement of certainty and the principle of entity. Namely, the local predicament of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime. The third part mainly analyzes the reasons of the dilemma of the principle of legality of a crime in China. The lack of supporting system to guarantee the healthy operation of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime is the basic cause of the dilemma in China. The contradiction between the clarity of the principle of legality of a crime and the openness of the criminal law system is the technical reason leading to China's predicament, and the misreading of the connotation and spirit of the principle of legality of a crime is the most important cause of the plight of China. In the fourth part, the author puts forward the countermeasures of the dilemma of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime in China. Firstly, it is necessary to set up a new concept of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime and strive to realize the rule of criminal law. In judicial practice, we should give full play to the subjective initiative of judges, that is, to carry out the individualization of punishment and to establish a criminal law interpretation mechanism based on judges. Finally, it is suggested that the system of criminal precedents should be established in our country in order to solve the dilemma of clarity of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime. The fifth part is the understanding and thinking about the dilemma of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 漢斯·霍曼 ,何蘭,沈云鷗;普通法的性質(zhì)和法律推理的比較研究[J];比較法研究;1991年04期

2 楊紅文;;從罪刑法定看刑罰個別化[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年S1期

3 翟慎海;;紐倫堡審判和東京審判的法律困惑之解讀——以罪刑法定原則為視角[J];河南司法警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年03期

4 張軍;罪刑法定在我國的困境及其出路[J];揚州大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2005年03期

本文編號：1667253