本文選題：受賄罪　切入點(diǎn)：行為主體　出處：《河北大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：受賄罪是腐敗犯罪中最為嚴(yán)重的一種,它體現(xiàn)的是“權(quán)錢交易”,即國(guó)家工作人員利用手中的職權(quán)謀取利益,具有嚴(yán)重的社會(huì)危害性。我們國(guó)家的黨和政府歷來(lái)重視對(duì)受賄犯罪的打擊懲處,制定了一系列法律規(guī)定和相關(guān)司法解釋,對(duì)遏制受賄犯罪取得了很大成績(jī)。但是由于法律規(guī)定的不足,刑法理論對(duì)一些問(wèn)題的認(rèn)識(shí)仍然比較混亂,司法實(shí)務(wù)對(duì)受賄犯罪的認(rèn)定還存在一些困難。本文通過(guò)分析受賄罪若干疑難問(wèn)題的司法認(rèn)定來(lái)闡述相關(guān)的立法完善問(wèn)題。本文分為四個(gè)部分,第一部分闡述受賄罪行為主體的司法認(rèn)定,從受賄罪行為主體的一般情形即“國(guó)家工作人員”的四種分類和特殊情形即離退休國(guó)家工作人員、非國(guó)家工作人員受賄的司法認(rèn)定以及作為共犯的情形分別進(jìn)行闡述。第二部分闡述受賄罪行為的司法認(rèn)定,從索取型受賄和收受型受賄兩個(gè)方面闡述了一般受賄的表現(xiàn)形式及司法認(rèn)定中的不足之處,又從經(jīng)濟(jì)受賄和間接受賄的角度闡述了特殊受賄的表現(xiàn)形式及司法認(rèn)定中的不足。第三部分闡述受賄罪行為對(duì)象的司法認(rèn)定,在闡述受賄罪行為對(duì)象的理論紛爭(zhēng)與觀點(diǎn)評(píng)述的基礎(chǔ)上提出我國(guó)受賄罪行為對(duì)象應(yīng)當(dāng)是“不正當(dāng)好處”或“不正當(dāng)利益”。第四部分闡述受賄罪的立法完善,在犯罪主體上應(yīng)當(dāng)用“公職人員”代替“國(guó)家工作人員”;在客觀行為上應(yīng)取消“為他人謀取利益”的規(guī)定;在行為對(duì)象上應(yīng)當(dāng)將“性賄賂”納入刑法調(diào)整范圍;在法定刑上應(yīng)當(dāng)設(shè)置獨(dú)立的法定刑,改變“計(jì)贓論罪”的處罰模式,增設(shè)罰金刑,廢除死刑。
[Abstract]:The crime of accepting bribes is one of the most serious crimes of corruption, which embodies the "power and money transaction", that is, the state functionaries use their power to obtain benefits. The party and government of our country have always attached importance to the crackdown and punishment of the crime of bribery, and have formulated a series of legal provisions and relevant judicial interpretations. Great achievements have been made in curbing the crime of bribery. However, due to the lack of legal provisions, the understanding of some issues in the theory of criminal law is still rather confused. There are still some difficulties in the determination of bribery crime in judicial practice. This paper expounds the relevant legislative perfection problems by analyzing the judicial cognizance of several difficult problems of bribery crime. This article is divided into four parts. The first part expounds the judicial cognizance of the subject of the crime of accepting bribes, from the general situation of the subject of the crime of accepting bribes, that is, the four kinds of classification and special circumstances of "state functionary", that is, the retired state functionary. The judicial cognizance of bribery of non-state functionary and the situation as accomplice are expounded respectively. The second part expounds the judicial cognizance of the crime of accepting bribes. From the two aspects of taking bribes with request and accepting bribes, this paper expounds the manifestations of general bribery and the shortcomings of judicial cognizance. From the angle of economic bribery and indirect bribery, the paper expounds the manifestation of special bribery and the deficiency of judicial cognizance. The third part expounds the judicial identification of the object of bribery crime. On the basis of expounding the theoretical disputes and viewpoints of the object of bribery crime, the author points out that the object of bribery crime in our country should be "improper advantage" or "improper benefit". The fourth part expounds the legislative perfection of bribery crime. On the subject of crime, "public official" should be used instead of "national functionary", the stipulation of "seeking benefits for others" should be abolished in objective behavior, "sexual bribery" should be included in the scope of adjustment of criminal law in the object of behavior; In the legal punishment, we should set up independent legal punishment, change the punishment mode of "counting the stolen goods", add the fine penalty and abolish the death penalty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.392

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 莫洪憲;葉小琴;;賄賂的范圍——以“性賄賂”為視角[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年03期

2 熊文玲;非物質(zhì)利益賄賂應(yīng)規(guī)定為賄賂罪探析[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);1998年04期

3 張成法;;論“性賄賂”是否構(gòu)成犯罪[J];理論界;2009年08期

4 黃濤;“性賄賂罪”之探討──從刑法的謙抑性論其不足[J];人民檢察;2001年07期

5 柴華;;受賄罪若干問(wèn)題探析[J];陜西省行政學(xué)院.陜西省經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 高雷;受賄罪中賄賂目的物的立法缺陷及完善[D];蘭州大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1645437