本文關鍵詞： 財產(chǎn)交付 財產(chǎn)交付意識 利用信息網(wǎng)絡 詐騙罪　出處：《法學》2015年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：詐騙罪中利用信息網(wǎng)絡的財產(chǎn)交付,表現(xiàn)為被騙者對數(shù)據(jù)、程序、網(wǎng)絡等產(chǎn)生錯誤認識,而授權計算機轉(zhuǎn)移財產(chǎn)的行為,為被騙者基于錯誤認識而實施的終局性財產(chǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移,至少有交付的認識可能性。從客觀上看,該行為是被騙者的錯誤認識所引起的轉(zhuǎn)移占有,并直接導致財產(chǎn)損失,需排除占有的弛緩;從主觀上看,雖然不能否定被騙者的交付意識,但對其意識內(nèi)容則應作緩和理解,擴張到認識可能性的范圍;從體系上看,利用信息網(wǎng)絡的詐騙罪不同于所謂的計算機詐騙罪,客觀上需要被騙者的財產(chǎn)交付。
[Abstract]:In the crime of fraud, the delivery of property by using information network is manifested by the behavior of the deceived person to misunderstand the data, the program, the network and so on, and authorize the computer to transfer the property. There is at least the possibility of delivery of the final transfer of property for the deceived person based on the wrong understanding. Objectively speaking, the act is the transfer of possession caused by the deceived person's wrong understanding. And directly lead to property losses, the need to exclude the relaxation of possession; From the subjective point of view, although the delivery consciousness of the deceived person cannot be denied, the content of its consciousness should be relaxed and understood and expanded to the scope of the possibility of cognition. Systemically, the crime of fraud by using information network is different from the crime of computer fraud, which objectively requires the delivery of the property of the deceived.
【作者單位】： 中南財經(jīng)政法大學;
【分類號】：D924.3
【正文快照】： 2014年6月23日,最高人民法院發(fā)布的第27號指導案例(8卩“臧進泉等盜竊、詐騙案”)就信息網(wǎng)絡條件下如何區(qū)分二罪形成了指導性意見。依據(jù)該判決,利用第三方支付平臺,以g錘犢羆鍬嘉榪，

本文編號：1475727