本文關(guān)鍵詞： 入戶(hù)搶劫 搶劫罪 犯罪形態(tài) 共同犯罪　出處：《天津師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：入戶(hù)搶劫行為因具有嚴(yán)重的法益侵害性,所以我國(guó)刑法對(duì)其規(guī)定了更加嚴(yán)重的法定刑。鑒于實(shí)務(wù)中出現(xiàn)的各種情形,最高法也多次通過(guò)司法解釋就如何認(rèn)定入戶(hù)搶劫中的相關(guān)問(wèn)題加以規(guī)范,但理論界與實(shí)務(wù)界仍對(duì)一些相關(guān)問(wèn)題存在巨大爭(zhēng)議。因此有必要對(duì)入戶(hù)搶劫行為進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步的研究,以不斷追求理論與實(shí)務(wù)的統(tǒng)一。本文是在借鑒前人研究成果基礎(chǔ)之上而完成,一共分為以下四個(gè)部分:第一部分入戶(hù)搶劫基本行為的認(rèn)定中,闡述了入戶(hù)搶劫行為中對(duì)"戶(hù)"的認(rèn)知和理解以及從行為人實(shí)施入戶(hù)搶劫行為時(shí)對(duì)入戶(hù)的認(rèn)識(shí)、目的、方式和主體四個(gè)方面闡釋了對(duì)"入戶(hù)"的認(rèn)識(shí)。本文認(rèn)為,"戶(hù)"是指能體現(xiàn)公民日常起居、體現(xiàn)主要財(cái)產(chǎn)存放地以及體現(xiàn)人們心靈歸屬和使人最值得安全信賴(lài)的空間場(chǎng)所。第二部分轉(zhuǎn)化型入戶(hù)搶劫認(rèn)定中,筆者主要從轉(zhuǎn)化型入戶(hù)搶劫的概念、構(gòu)成要件以及如何對(duì)轉(zhuǎn)化型入戶(hù)搶劫具體認(rèn)定等方面作進(jìn)一步研究。本文認(rèn)為轉(zhuǎn)化型入戶(hù)搶劫的先行行為只包括入戶(hù)盜竊一種,并且不要求先行行為達(dá)到構(gòu)成犯罪的程度。第三部分從入戶(hù)搶劫是否存在未完成形態(tài)以及理論和實(shí)務(wù)界對(duì)入戶(hù)搶劫中"著手"的認(rèn)定等方面對(duì)入戶(hù)搶劫的犯罪形態(tài)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了探討。本文認(rèn)為入戶(hù)搶劫作為加重構(gòu)成犯存在未完成形態(tài),并且入戶(hù)搶劫中的"著手"是指行為人為獲取財(cái)物而將要對(duì)受害人實(shí)施暴力或者以暴力相威脅時(shí)才是著手。文章最后一部分從共同入戶(hù)搶劫的特征和分類(lèi)以及入戶(hù)搶劫共同犯罪過(guò)限問(wèn)題等方面對(duì)入戶(hù)搶劫的共犯問(wèn)題作了進(jìn)一步的分析和探討,以求對(duì)入戶(hù)搶劫相關(guān)的問(wèn)題有更完整和準(zhǔn)確的把握。
[Abstract]:Because of the serious infringement of legal interests, the criminal law of our country prescribes a more serious legal penalty. In view of the various situations in practice. The Supreme Law also through the judicial interpretation of how to determine the relevant issues of home robbery to be standardized. However, there are still a lot of controversies in theory and practice. Therefore, it is necessary to further study the behavior of house robbery. In order to constantly pursue the unity of theory and practice. This article is based on the previous research results and completed, a total of four parts: the first part of the identification of the basic behavior of home robbery. This paper expounds the cognition and understanding of the "household" in the behavior of house robbery, and the understanding and purpose of the perpetrator when he carries out the behavior of "house robbery". The way and the main body explain the understanding of "entering the household". This article thinks that the "household" means that it can embody the citizens' daily living. Reflect the main property storage and reflect people's spiritual ownership and the most reliable place in space. The second part of the transformed home robbery identification, the author mainly from the transformation of the concept of home robbery. The constitutive elements and how to identify the specific aspects of the transformed robbery into the home and so on. This paper thinks that the first behavior of the transformed robbery only includes one kind of burglary. And do not require the first act to constitute a crime. The third part of the house robbery from whether there is not completed form and the theory and practice of home robberies in the "start" This paper discusses the problem of the criminal form of house robbery. The author thinks that there is an incomplete form in the form of robbery in the home as an aggravated crime. And the "go" in house robberies. The last part of the article starts from the characteristics and classification of joint house robbery and the problem of overlimitation of joint crime of robbery in the house. The last part of the article is to point out that the perpetrator is about to carry out violence or threaten the victim with violence in order to obtain property. On the other hand, this paper makes further analysis and discussion on the problem of accomplices in house robberies. In order to have a more complete and accurate grasp of the problems related to house robbery.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 謝仁杰;;論入戶(hù)搶劫中的“戶(hù)”[J];甘肅警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年01期

2 黃奇中;;論“入戶(hù)搶劫”的保護(hù)法益[J];海峽法學(xué);2014年02期

3 張明楷;;論入戶(hù)搶劫[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2013年05期

4 陳霞;;轉(zhuǎn)化型入戶(hù)搶劫研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年09期

5 張明楷;;加重構(gòu)成與量刑規(guī)則的區(qū)分[J];清華法學(xué);2011年01期

6 李蕊;;淺析“入戶(hù)搶劫”中的兩個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];行政與法(吉林省行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2006年S1期

7 張永紅;;“入戶(hù)搶劫”新論[J];河北法學(xué);2006年11期

8 黃祥青;;論搶劫罪情節(jié)加重犯的認(rèn)定思路與方法[J];政治與法律;2005年06期

9 周振想,林維;搶劫罪特別類(lèi)型研究[J];人民檢察;1999年01期

10 肖中華;論搶劫罪適用中的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1475456