【摘要】：憲法是國(guó)家的根本大法,是各種法律法規(guī)的“母法”,這就決定了憲法具有抽象性、概括性、原則性；另外,在國(guó)家的法律體系中憲法具有最高的法律效力,這就決定了憲法的最高權(quán)威性,也就必須具有穩(wěn)定性,是不能被朝令夕改的。然而現(xiàn)實(shí)生活是不斷發(fā)展變化的,為了保障憲法的實(shí)施,推動(dòng)憲法的不斷發(fā)展、維護(hù)憲法穩(wěn)定性就必須對(duì)憲法加以解釋。而通過(guò)對(duì)憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)的分析對(duì)保障憲法的有效實(shí)施、正確理解憲法、維護(hù)憲法的權(quán)威具有重要的意義。世界上不同的國(guó)家采用不同的憲法解釋權(quán)模式,這是因?yàn)閷?duì)憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)的分析不同所導(dǎo)致的。我國(guó)近年來(lái)在實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)了一些公民基本權(quán)利受到侵害的案件,在這些案件中基本法律沒(méi)有規(guī)定從而就無(wú)法適用基本法,此時(shí)就需要憲法這一根本法對(duì)公民的基本權(quán)利加以保護(hù),但是在司法實(shí)踐中,憲法并沒(méi)有作為法院裁判案件的直接法律依據(jù),沒(méi)有產(chǎn)生實(shí)際的法律效力。鑒于現(xiàn)實(shí)中出現(xiàn)了越來(lái)越多的公民基本權(quán)利遭到侵害而在憲法解釋閑置的前提下公民權(quán)利沒(méi)有途徑得到救濟(jì)的情況,使得我們對(duì)我國(guó)的全國(guó)人大常委會(huì)的憲法解釋權(quán)是否合理產(chǎn)生質(zhì)疑。通過(guò)憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)的分析對(duì)憲法的實(shí)施、發(fā)展具有深遠(yuǎn)影響,而我國(guó)對(duì)憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)卻沒(méi)有給予足夠的重視,我國(guó)的憲法解釋制度還很不完善。本文通過(guò)國(guó)內(nèi)外對(duì)憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)的分析,同時(shí)對(duì)我國(guó)憲法解釋權(quán)在理論和實(shí)踐中存在的問(wèn)題加以分析,結(jié)合國(guó)外的相關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出解決問(wèn)題的對(duì)策,以期對(duì)我國(guó)的憲法解釋制度有所裨益。 本文除引言和結(jié)論外,共分為四部分。 第一部分是憲法解釋權(quán)基本理論。這一部分通過(guò)對(duì)憲法解釋權(quán)基本概念的分析,使得人們能夠?qū)ξ覈?guó)的憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)有了深入的認(rèn)識(shí),并對(duì)憲法解釋權(quán)的性質(zhì)進(jìn)行重新界定,通過(guò)對(duì)憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)的介紹對(duì)我國(guó)的憲法的法律適用以及憲法解釋的進(jìn)一步完善具有一定的理論意義。 第二部分是對(duì)國(guó)外憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)的介紹。這一部分通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)外憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)的介紹,主要是對(duì)國(guó)外與國(guó)內(nèi)憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)的橫向比較,引發(fā)人們對(duì)我國(guó)憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)的思考。通過(guò)國(guó)內(nèi)外憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)的比較對(duì)我國(guó)憲法解釋權(quán)的完善有一定的現(xiàn)實(shí)指導(dǎo)作用。 第三部分是通過(guò)對(duì)現(xiàn)有的典型案例的分析,引出我國(guó)憲法解釋權(quán)存在的問(wèn)題并對(duì)這些問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析。通過(guò)分析我們看到正是由于我國(guó)憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)存在一些不完善之處,使得我國(guó)出現(xiàn)了許多憲法案件卻無(wú)法使得當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)利得到有效的救濟(jì),進(jìn)而使得人們對(duì)我國(guó)法律權(quán)威產(chǎn)生懷疑,導(dǎo)致我國(guó)法律體系受到威脅。 第四部分是針對(duì)我國(guó)憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)存在的問(wèn)題提出的相應(yīng)的完善措施。包括根源上憲法的法律適用,憲法解釋的主體設(shè)計(jì)以及程序設(shè)計(jì)。通過(guò)這種比較完善的制度化規(guī)定使得我國(guó)的憲法案件能夠有法可依,公民的基本權(quán)利得到合法的保障,對(duì)我國(guó)社會(huì)的穩(wěn)定和諧發(fā)展有重要的影響。
[Abstract]:Constitution is the fundamental law of the country and the "mother law" of various laws and regulations, which determines that the constitution is abstract, general and principled; in addition, the constitution has the highest legal effect in the national legal system, which determines the supreme authority of the constitution, and it must be stable and can not be changed overnight. In order to ensure the implementation of the Constitution, promote its continuous development and maintain its stability, the Constitution must be interpreted. The analysis of the nature of the power of interpretation of the Constitution is of great significance to the effective implementation of the Constitution, the correct understanding of the Constitution and the protection of the authority of the Constitution. In recent years, some cases of infringement of citizens'basic rights have appeared in our country. In these cases, the basic law can not be applied because the basic law is not stipulated in the basic law. At this time, the basic law of constitution is needed. The basic rights of citizens are protected, but in judicial practice, the Constitution does not serve as the direct legal basis for the court to adjudicate cases and has no actual legal effect. The analysis of the nature of the Constitutional Interpretation Power has a far-reaching impact on the implementation and development of the Constitution. However, China has not paid enough attention to the nature of the Constitutional Interpretation Power, and China's Constitutional Interpretation System is far from perfect. This paper analyzes the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation both at home and abroad, analyzes the problems existing in the theory and practice of the power of constitutional interpretation in our country, and puts forward some countermeasures to solve the problems in the light of the relevant experience abroad, in order to benefit the system of constitutional interpretation in our country.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into four parts.
The first part is the basic theory of the power of constitutional interpretation.Through the analysis of the basic concepts of the power of constitutional interpretation, people can have a deep understanding of the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation in China, redefine the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation, and introduce the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation to the legal application of our constitution. And the further improvement of the constitutional interpretation has certain theoretical significance.
The second part is the introduction of the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation in foreign countries. This part introduces the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation in foreign countries, mainly the horizontal comparison between the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation in foreign countries and in China, which arouses people's thinking about the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation in China. The improvement has certain guiding role in reality.
The third part is through the analysis of the existing typical cases, leads to the problems of the right to interpret the Constitution in China and analyzes these problems. Effective relief, and then make people doubt the authority of our legal system, leading to the threat to our legal system.
The fourth part is about the corresponding measures to improve the nature of the Constitutional Interpretation, including the application of the law, the design of the main body and the procedure of the Constitutional Interpretation. The guarantee has an important influence on the stable and harmonious development of our society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D921

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 魏健馨;;美國(guó)憲法解釋制度解析——兼論對(duì)中國(guó)憲法解釋制度的啟示[J];天津法學(xué);2011年03期

2 黃娟;;全國(guó)人大與其常委會(huì)立法權(quán)沖突的現(xiàn)實(shí)出路[J];求實(shí);2011年07期

3 包金玉;;我國(guó)憲法司法化探討[J];前沿;2011年15期

4 齊冠軍;李立強(qiáng);;防止我國(guó)憲法司法化的必要性[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前8條

1 本報(bào)記者李新會(huì);憲法解釋是憲法實(shí)施的重要保障[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2002年

2 吳酩;香港不適宜馬上采取普選[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào)海外版;2004年

3 中國(guó)政法大學(xué)教授 焦洪昌;憲法的性質(zhì)[N];人民法院報(bào);2001年

4 本報(bào)記者 樂(lè)欣;憲法權(quán)利不是空中樓閣[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2002年

5 顧元;西方國(guó)家的憲法解釋機(jī)制[N];學(xué)習(xí)時(shí)報(bào);2000年

6 ;把握良好契機(jī)　推進(jìn)法治建設(shè)[N];21世紀(jì)經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào)道;2003年

7 任進(jìn);建立憲法訴訟制度 推進(jìn)憲法規(guī)范實(shí)施[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2001年

8 本報(bào)專稿 艾櫟楠;美政治進(jìn)入少數(shù)族裔盛開(kāi)期[N];世界報(bào);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 趙佩佩;憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)研究[D];山西大學(xué);2011年

2 張潔;論憲法解釋權(quán)的主體[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

3 田川;我國(guó)憲法解釋制度問(wèn)題研究[D];河北大學(xué);2010年

4 黨沖;論我國(guó)憲法解釋制度的完善[D];山西大學(xué);2012年

5 耿紫陽(yáng);俄羅斯憲法解釋制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

6 位敏;俄羅斯聯(lián)邦憲法解釋制度研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2012年

7 許傲雪;建立和完善我國(guó)的憲法解釋制度[D];鄭州大學(xué);2007年

8 郝靜;憲法解釋權(quán)比較研究[D];天津師范大學(xué);2008年

9 王玉榮;我國(guó)違憲審查制度的現(xiàn)狀及完善[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2012年

10 張紅利;論我國(guó)憲法私有財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的發(fā)展與完善[D];中央民族大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2219201