本文選題：俄羅斯聯(lián)邦　切入點(diǎn)：公民居住權(quán)　出處：《延邊大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在城市化進(jìn)程日益加速的今天,高房?jī)r(jià)、居住難對(duì)公民個(gè)體的困擾業(yè)已作為一個(gè)世界性的熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題擺在各國(guó)權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)和政府的面前,我國(guó)亦不能免俗。自1998年我國(guó)的福利分房制度正式退出歷史舞臺(tái)以來(lái),20多年間我國(guó)已經(jīng)在探索中逐漸發(fā)展起一套具有本國(guó)特色的居住用房及相應(yīng)設(shè)施的流轉(zhuǎn)和保障制度。但是在最近5年,“蟻?zhàn)濉�、“蝸居”等詞匯頻繁的沖擊著我們的視覺神經(jīng)和聽覺神經(jīng),讓我們不得不遺憾的承認(rèn),老百姓住房難在當(dāng)今中國(guó)已經(jīng)成為了一個(gè)刻不容緩問(wèn)題而急需妥善的解決；否則,對(duì)于社會(huì)的穩(wěn)定、民生目標(biāo)的達(dá)成乃至和諧社會(huì)的建立都會(huì)產(chǎn)生難以估量的負(fù)面影響�！熬幼‰y”這個(gè)問(wèn)題爆發(fā)的原因是多方面、綜合性的,這里僅從憲法學(xué)的層面來(lái)考量。筆者個(gè)人覺得,我國(guó)在憲法上,對(duì)于公民居住權(quán)內(nèi)涵的認(rèn)知缺失,是導(dǎo)致這個(gè)矛盾凸顯的根本原因;換句話說(shuō),想解決公民“居住難”問(wèn)題,首先要發(fā)展和完善我國(guó)現(xiàn)行憲法,明晰適于我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段發(fā)展?fàn)顩r的公民居住權(quán)的內(nèi)涵范疇,并將其以憲法規(guī)范的形式加以固定,進(jìn)而建立一套可行的公民居住權(quán)保障體系,并深化和加強(qiáng)憲法對(duì)其的監(jiān)督力度,從而逐步有效的保障公民居住權(quán)得以落實(shí),以解決當(dāng)前“居住難”的問(wèn)題。 與我國(guó)一衣帶水的俄羅斯聯(lián)邦獨(dú)立于前蘇維埃聯(lián)盟,在歷史、政治、乃至國(guó)民意識(shí)形態(tài)上與我國(guó)均有著頗深的淵源。而俄羅斯聯(lián)邦在1991年至1998年期間也曾存在與我國(guó)目前所面臨的“居住難”問(wèn)題相類似的情形,而且由于自由化思潮和政治制度等因素的影響,其程度之嚴(yán)重較我國(guó)更深。但俄羅斯聯(lián)邦政府及相關(guān)主體在《聯(lián)邦憲法》的指引和規(guī)范下,短短的5年間即扭轉(zhuǎn)了居住權(quán)保障不力的局面,重塑了公民對(duì)聯(lián)邦的信心,使居住資源市場(chǎng)擺脫了崩盤的危險(xiǎn),重新回復(fù)到良性發(fā)展的軌道上去,這不得不令人欽佩�！堵�(lián)邦憲法》及其配套的下位法在這場(chǎng)戰(zhàn)役中起到了多大的價(jià)值,它們?cè)诠窬幼?quán)保障上究竟是如何運(yùn)行的,相關(guān)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)?zāi)芊駷槲覈?guó)所用等等問(wèn)題引起了筆者的興趣,這也是促使這篇文章得以面世的直接動(dòng)因和目的。 本課題以俄羅斯聯(lián)邦公民居住權(quán)介評(píng)為主線,同時(shí)附帶的介紹了當(dāng)今世界主要國(guó)家的憲法在公民居住權(quán)及其保障上所取得的成績(jī)。文章第一部分是緒論部分,針對(duì)選題背景、選題意義、研究現(xiàn)狀等展開介紹,為下文對(duì)主要內(nèi)容的論述打下基礎(chǔ)；文章第二部分主要是針對(duì)俄聯(lián)邦聯(lián)邦公民居住權(quán)展開評(píng)介,同時(shí)附帶介紹了當(dāng)今國(guó)際法上對(duì)公民居住權(quán)內(nèi)涵已經(jīng)達(dá)成的共識(shí),目的在于明晰公民居住權(quán)這個(gè)法學(xué)理念所應(yīng)有的內(nèi)涵；文章的第三部分以歷史發(fā)展為主線,對(duì)俄聯(lián)邦公民居住權(quán)的前世今生展開探索,通過(guò)歷時(shí)性研究力求解讀俄聯(lián)邦公民居住權(quán)的發(fā)展軌跡；在明晰了俄聯(lián)邦公民居住權(quán)的內(nèi)涵和發(fā)展歷程的前提下,文章的第四部分嘗試解讀和評(píng)論對(duì)這項(xiàng)權(quán)利的憲法保障途徑,并針對(duì)其靜態(tài)保障模式及動(dòng)態(tài)保障模式的特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了分析；從而為文章的第五部分奠定基礎(chǔ),其目的是使我國(guó)能夠從俄羅斯聯(lián)邦的相應(yīng)立法、司法行為中得到一定啟示,從而為我國(guó)的憲法和憲政手段得以進(jìn)一步完善和發(fā)展提供相應(yīng)的參考資料。
[Abstract]:In the process of accelerating the city today, high prices, living difficult for individual citizens have problems as a hot issue in the world in front of the authority and the government of our country, also cannot escape. Since 1998, China's welfare housing system officially quit the stage of history, 20 years I China has been in the exploration gradually develop a set of its own living space and corresponding facilities and circulation security system. But in the last 5 years, the "ant tribe", "dwelling", the impact of frequent visual and auditory nerve to us, we are sorry to admit that people living in in today's difficult China has become an urgent problem needed solved properly; otherwise, for social stability, the establishment of a harmonious society and even the people's livelihood goals will have incalculable negative impact " The reason to question the outbreak of living is multifaceted, comprehensive, here only from the constitutional level to consider. I personally feel that in our constitution, for lack of cognitive connotation of housing rights of citizens, is the fundamental cause of this contradiction; in other words, to solve the "housing difficult" problem of citizens first of all, to develop and improve China's current constitution, suitable for clear connotation and category the present development situation of civil rights, and the form to be fixed by the constitution, and then set up a set of feasible civil rights safeguard system, and deepen and strengthen the supervision of the constitution, thus gradually effective protection of civil rights can be implemented, to solve the "housing difficult" problems.
China's Russian Federation and a narrow strip of water independent of the former Soviet Union, in history, politics, and national ideology and China have deep roots in Russian Federation. In 1991 to 1998 there was in China and facing the "housing difficult" problem similar to the situation, but due to the impact of liberalization the political system and other factors, its severity is our country deeply. But the Russian Federation government and related subjects in the < > federal constitutional guidelines and norms, a short span of 5 years, which turned the residence of poor security bureau, reshape the public confidence in the federal, the living resources market to get rid of the crash danger, back to the benign development track, which had to be admirable. The Federal Constitution > and supporting the lower level law has played a big role in this battle, they are in the public houses How does the right of residence actually operate? Whether the relevant experience can arouse the interest of our country and other issues, is also the direct motivation and purpose for this article to be published.
Subject to the Russian Federation civil rights review as the main line, at the same time with the introduction of the world's major countries in the constitution of civil rights and safeguard the achievements. The first part is the introduction, the background, significance, research status quo and expand the introduction, lay the foundation for the following discussion of the main content; the second part is mainly directed against the Russian federal civil rights expansion review, at the same time on the fringe of today's international law on the connotation of the living rights of citizens has reached a consensus to clear the civil rights law concept the connotation; the third part of the article based on the historical development as the main line, focus on exploration of the Russian Federation the right of citizens living in preexistence, through a diachronic study tries to analyze the development track of the Russian federal civil rights; in the Russian Federation citizens home The premise of the implication and the development right under the fourth part of the article tries to interpret and comment on the constitutional protection of the right of way, and analyzed its static and dynamic security mode security mode; so as to lay the foundation for the fifth part of the article, the purpose is to make our legislation from the corresponding Russian Federation, get some enlightenment of judicial behavior, so as to provide reference for further improvement and development of our country's constitution and constitutional means.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D951.2;DD911

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 尤曉紅;;論俄羅斯憲法法院對(duì)公民基本權(quán)利的保障[J];北方法學(xué);2008年06期

2 龐凌,繆嵐;安全·自由·自主──住宅不受侵犯的價(jià)值蘊(yùn)含[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

3 尤曉紅;;俄羅斯憲法法院與人權(quán)保障[J];俄羅斯中亞?wèn)|歐研究;2007年01期

4 林來(lái)梵,季彥敏;人權(quán)保障:作為原則的意義[J];法商研究;2005年04期

5 林來(lái)梵;;臥室里的憲法權(quán)利[J];法學(xué)家;2003年03期

6 吳慧;《歐洲人權(quán)公約》實(shí)施機(jī)制的發(fā)展[J];國(guó)際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

7 龔向和;;社會(huì)權(quán)的概念[J];河北法學(xué);2007年09期

8 賈少鑫;我國(guó)人權(quán)觀念的嬗變與人權(quán)進(jìn)步的理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)表現(xiàn)[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年03期

9 劉茂林;范電勤;;論我國(guó)城鎮(zhèn)住房保障制度的發(fā)展與完善——以基本權(quán)利為視角[J];寧波大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2008年06期

10 尤雪云;經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)、文化權(quán)利在中國(guó)[J];人權(quán);2005年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 曲少臣;我國(guó)住房保障法律制度研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

2 紀(jì)雙蘭;公民住宅權(quán)的憲法價(jià)值及其保障[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1638290