【摘要】：公安機(jī)關(guān)經(jīng)偵部門的初查，是指公安機(jī)關(guān)的經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪偵查部門對(duì)涉嫌經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪的線索材料進(jìn)行初步的審查、調(diào)查，以確定是否符合立案條件的活動(dòng)。經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪具有隱蔽性、復(fù)雜性、抽象性及其與經(jīng)濟(jì)糾紛的界限的模糊性等特點(diǎn)，實(shí)踐中對(duì)犯罪案件所進(jìn)行的初查活動(dòng)相比較一般的刑事案件更為重要。目前，幾乎公安機(jī)關(guān)所有的經(jīng)濟(jì)案件在立案前甚至接報(bào)案件后都會(huì)有詢問、走訪、調(diào)查取證、現(xiàn)場(chǎng)勘查等初查措施，甚至有的案件在立案前還必須先采取緊急措施，，之后再補(bǔ)辦相關(guān)手續(xù)，初查所獲取的證據(jù)材料在后續(xù)的審判中起到了重大的作用。 遺憾的是，初查的法律地位遲遲沒有得到確認(rèn)。2013年的新刑訴法仍然沒有為初查“上戶”，于是不少反對(duì)者以初查是刑訴法上的“黑戶”為由否認(rèn)初查中所獲得的證據(jù)材料的證據(jù)效力，在實(shí)踐必須與法律缺失的矛盾下，初查制度已然成為“刑訴法不得不說的一大漏洞”。有鑒于此，本文主要對(duì)公安機(jī)關(guān)經(jīng)偵部門辦理經(jīng)濟(jì)案件過程中的初查活動(dòng)進(jìn)行探討。 本文主要分為四個(gè)部分來對(duì)公安機(jī)關(guān)經(jīng)濟(jì)案件的初查進(jìn)行討論。 第一部分全面分析我國公安機(jī)關(guān)經(jīng)偵部門經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件中的初查制度。涵蓋了初查的概念、起源以及發(fā)展、法律屬性、其與相關(guān)概念的辨析以及國外相關(guān)立法關(guān)于類似制度的規(guī)定等內(nèi)容。 第二部分重點(diǎn)討論備受爭(zhēng)議的初查合法性、合理性、必要性以及初查制度在公安機(jī)關(guān)司法實(shí)踐中的重要意義等問題。 第三部分主要針對(duì)公安機(jī)關(guān)初查的措施、策略，具體運(yùn)行路徑，應(yīng)遵循的原則以及初查結(jié)果的證據(jù)效力問題提出自己的看法。 第四部分是關(guān)于我國公安機(jī)關(guān)初查制度的運(yùn)行現(xiàn)狀以及需要注意的幾點(diǎn)。 客觀存在決定人們的意識(shí)。長期以來，初查制度已然為經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件工作所必須，切切實(shí)實(shí)地發(fā)揮著舉足輕重的作用，那么，不久的將來，其被我國的刑事訴訟法所規(guī)定也是必然。
[Abstract]:The preliminary investigation of the economic investigation department of the public security organ refers to the preliminary examination and investigation of the clue materials of the suspected economic crime by the economic crime investigation department of the public security organ in order to determine whether it meets the conditions for filing a case. Economic crime has the characteristics of concealment, complexity, abstractness and fuzziness of its boundary with economic disputes. In practice, the preliminary investigation activities of criminal cases are more important than the general criminal cases. At present, almost all economic cases in public security organs will be questioned, visited, investigated, collected evidence, on-site investigation and other preliminary investigation measures before filing a case or even after receiving a case, and even some cases must take urgent measures before filing a case, and then complete the relevant formalities. The evidence materials obtained from the preliminary investigation have played an important role in the follow-up trial. Unfortunately, the legal status of the preliminary investigation has not been confirmed for a long time. The new criminal procedure law in 2013 is still not "registered" for the preliminary investigation, so many opponents deny the evidentiary effect of the evidence obtained in the preliminary investigation on the grounds that the preliminary investigation is the "household registration failure" in the criminal procedure law. Under the contradiction between the practice and the lack of law, the preliminary investigation system has become "a major loophole that the criminal procedure law has to say." In view of this, this paper mainly discusses the preliminary investigation activities in the process of handling economic cases by the economic investigation department of public security organs. This paper is divided into four parts to discuss the preliminary investigation of economic cases in public security organs. The first part comprehensively analyzes the preliminary investigation system in the economic crime cases of the economic investigation department of the public security organs in our country. It covers the concept, origin and development of the preliminary investigation, the legal attribute, the discrimination between it and the related concepts, as well as the provisions of the relevant foreign legislation on similar systems. The second part focuses on the controversial legality, rationality and necessity of the preliminary investigation and the significance of the preliminary investigation system in the judicial practice of public security organs. The third part mainly puts forward its own views on the measures, strategies, specific operation paths, the principles to be followed and the evidence effectiveness of the preliminary investigation results of the public security organs. The fourth part is about the operation status of the preliminary investigation system of public security organs in our country and some points that need to be paid attention to. Objective existence determines people's consciousness. For a long time, the preliminary investigation system has been necessary for the work of economic crime cases, and plays an important role in practice. Then, in the near future, it is inevitable that it will be stipulated by the Criminal procedure Law of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉煒烽;;淺談“初查”制度[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2008年09期

2 詹琳玲;李哲;;淺議我國的偵查啟動(dòng)程序——立案[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年08期

3 高新平;王曉偉;;職務(wù)犯罪初查的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境與改革途徑[J];東岳論叢;2012年12期

4 劉忠;論經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件立案前的初查工作[J];湖南商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

5 張繼生;;職務(wù)犯罪初查活動(dòng)的性質(zhì)定位與改革完善[J];中國檢察官;2011年03期

6 龍宗智;;初查所獲證據(jù)的采信原則——以瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪案件初查為中心[J];人民檢察;2009年13期

7 樊鴻儒;;論經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件初查的必要性及其法律地位[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2007年27期

8 劉廣三;莊乾龍;;論刑事初查的屬性及其立法完善[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

9 宋陽;質(zhì)疑經(jīng)偵“初查”制度[J];犯罪研究;2004年03期

10 萬毅;陳大鵬;;初查若干法律問題研究[J];中國刑事法雜志;2008年04期

本文編號(hào)：2510809