【摘要】：刑民交叉,一直是司法實(shí)踐中的重點(diǎn)與難點(diǎn)問題,而刑民交叉程序如何啟動,以及有著各自特色的、又有著共性的刑事訴訟程序與民事訴訟程序如何有效地融和并適用,直接決定了刑民交叉案件能否順利啟動并有效的審結(jié)。不可否認(rèn),"先刑后民"是我國目前現(xiàn)行刑民交叉案件程序適用的主要模式,儼然成為司法慣例,這是由我國重刑輕民傳統(tǒng)思想根本導(dǎo)致的。隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展與社會的變遷,傳統(tǒng)上的"先刑后民"在司法實(shí)踐中暴露出了越來越多的弊端,法學(xué)家們與法律工作者也意識到這一點(diǎn),提出將"先民后刑"、"刑民并行"作為與"先刑后民"同一并行,也作為刑民交叉的程序適用規(guī)則。從要素上分析,刑民交叉本質(zhì)上系刑事與民事在法律事實(shí)或者法律要素方面進(jìn)行的交叉,交叉的范圍、難度、大小有所區(qū)別,導(dǎo)致交叉類型有所差異。本文以法律事實(shí)的要素進(jìn)行劃分,將刑民交叉劃分為競合型的刑民交叉與牽連型的刑民交叉;通過類比分析法,將刑民交叉程序適用的"先刑后民"、"先民后刑"、"刑民并行"三種程序,進(jìn)行各自的利弊分析及價(jià)值討論。通過制度上的完善,構(gòu)想出刑民交叉程序適用方式,妥善處理刑民交叉案件啟動程序問題。
[Abstract]:The cross-cutting of the people has always been the key and difficult problem in the judicial practice, and how to start the cross procedure of the people, and how to effectively melt and apply the criminal procedure and the civil procedure with their own characteristics. It is directly decided whether the cross-case of the criminal people can be successfully started and the conclusion can be effectively concluded. There is no denying that the "the post-execution of the people" is the main mode of the application of the current procedure of the cross-case of the current criminal in our country, and it is the judicial practice, which is caused by the traditional thought of the heavy-handed people in our country. With the development of economy and the change of society, the traditional "the post-execution of the people" has exposed more and more defects in the judicial practice, and the jurists and the legal workers also realized this, put forward the "first-to-people post-punishment" and the "the execution of the people in parallel" as the same parallel with the "the post-execution of the people", The rules for the application of the procedure of cross-cutting of the people are also applied. On the basis of the analysis of the elements, the cross-cutting of the cross-cutting, the difficulty and the size of the cross-cutting, the difficulty and the size of the criminal and the civil in the legal facts or the legal elements in the nature of the cross-cutting, resulting in a difference in the cross-type. This paper divides the elements of the legal fact, divides the people of the sentence into the cross of the competing types of the people, and then makes the analysis and value discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of the "the post-execution of the people", the "first-to-people post-punishment" and the "the execution of the people in parallel" which are applicable to the cross-procedure of the people by analogy. Through the perfection of the system, it is proposed that the application of the cross-procedure of the people and the people should properly handle the problem of the start-up procedure of the cross-case of the people.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2;D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 楊興培;;刑民交叉案件法理分析的邏輯進(jìn)路[J];中國刑事法雜志;2012年09期

2 劉保玉;周彬彬;;民事責(zé)任與義務(wù)的界分問題再思考[J];政法論叢;2009年04期

3 陳瑞華;;刑事附帶民事訴訟的三種模式[J];法學(xué)研究;2009年01期

4 萬毅;;“先刑后民”原則的實(shí)踐困境及其理論破解[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年02期

5 吳愛輝;;事實(shí)婚姻與“重婚”關(guān)系之探討——兼議民刑“重婚”之關(guān)系[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2006年03期

6 江偉,范躍如;刑民交叉案件處理機(jī)制研究[J];法商研究;2005年04期

7 陳興良,胡建生,朱平,李克;關(guān)于“先刑后民”司法原則的反思[J];北京市政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

8 趙秉志,田宏杰;刑事司法正義論[J];中國刑事法雜志;2000年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李奇才;競合型刑民交叉案件的處理程序研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

2 劉晶晶;刑民交叉案件處理機(jī)制研究[D];甘肅政法學(xué)院;2012年

，

本文編號：2510035