【摘要】： 補強證據(jù)規(guī)則是證據(jù)制度中的一項重要規(guī)則。民事訴訟補強證據(jù)規(guī)則屬于法定證據(jù)制度范疇,是自由心證的例外;是從證明力的角度對證據(jù)運用加以限制;其不僅是數(shù)量規(guī)則更是質(zhì)量規(guī)則;補強證據(jù)的證明對象應(yīng)當(dāng)與被補強證據(jù)具有一定程度的重疊。民事訴訟補強證據(jù)規(guī)則的法理依據(jù)包括:證據(jù)裁判原則;限制法官的自由裁量權(quán)以及民事訴訟補強證據(jù)規(guī)則與民事訴訟中的真實的關(guān)系。 兩大法系的民事訴訟補強證據(jù)規(guī)則的立法和理論研究沒有刑事訴訟補強證據(jù)規(guī)則那樣成體系,主要是對文書證據(jù)的補強證據(jù)規(guī)則規(guī)定,對兩大法系刑事訴訟中的法官強制提醒程序,補強證據(jù)規(guī)則的補強程度以及證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)在補強證據(jù)規(guī)則中的運用進(jìn)行了分析,指出民事訴訟中這些制度的運用。 盡管我國補強證據(jù)規(guī)則有了一些比較明細(xì)的規(guī)定,但仍然存在諸多問題:法律規(guī)定缺乏系統(tǒng)性,在立法形式上,法典與司法解釋并存,立法前后存在矛盾;補強證據(jù)、間接證據(jù)與補助證據(jù)相混淆;當(dāng)事人陳述作為被補強證據(jù)的范圍規(guī)定不清;欠缺調(diào)查程序保障。這些缺陷的存在,不利于補強證據(jù)規(guī)則在訴訟活動中真正發(fā)揮作用。 我國民事訴訟補強證據(jù)規(guī)則的完善,包括完善之必要性與具體構(gòu)想。我國民事訴訟補強證據(jù)規(guī)則有其存在的現(xiàn)實必要性。完善的具體構(gòu)想包括:加強立法的集中,提高立法的層次性;明確區(qū)分補強證據(jù)、間接證據(jù)與補助證據(jù);明確當(dāng)事人陳述被補強的范圍;細(xì)化補強證據(jù)規(guī)則的程序保障,明確關(guān)于補強程度的規(guī)定;同時提出其他應(yīng)適用補強證據(jù)規(guī)則的情形及對完善相應(yīng)的配套機(jī)制提出幾點意見。
[Abstract]:The evidence system is an important rule in the evidence system. The rule of reinforcement of civil action belongs to the category of the legal evidence system, which is the exception of the free-heart syndrome; it is the limitation of the application of the evidence from the angle of the proof force; it is not only the quantitative rule but also the quality rule; the proof object of the reinforcement evidence should have a certain degree of overlap with the evidence to be strengthened. The legal basis of the rules of evidence for the strengthening of civil litigation includes the principle of evidence referees, the limitation of the discretion of the judge and the real relationship between the evidence of the reinforcement of the civil action and the civil action. The legislative and theoretical study of the evidence of the reinforcement of civil action in the two legal systems is not as the system as the evidence of the evidence of the strengthening of the criminal procedure, which is mainly the rule of the evidence of the strengthening of the evidence of the instrument. This paper analyzes the strengthening of the awake procedure, the strengthening of the evidence of reinforcement and the application of the proof standard in the evidence of reinforcement, and points out these systems in the civil action The application of the rules of strengthening evidence in our country still has many problems: the lack of systematicness of the legal provisions, the co-existence of the code and the judicial interpretation in the form of legislation, the existence of contradictions before and after the legislation, the strengthening of the evidence and the indirect evidence, to be confused with the evidence of the grant; the party's statement is not clear as to the scope of the evidence to be reinforced; the understatement The existence of these defects is not conducive to the strengthening of the evidence of evidence in the litigation. The perfection of the evidence of the strengthening of the evidence of the strengthening of the civil litigation in our country, including the following: The necessity and the concrete conception of perfection. Evidence rules for the reinforcement of civil action in our country There are the real necessity of strengthening legislation, including: to strengthen the concentration of legislation and to improve the level of the legislation; to clearly distinguish the evidence of reinforcement, the indirect evidence and the supporting evidence, to clarify the scope of the strengthening of the parties' statements, and to refine the procedural guarantees of the evidence of reinforcement, The provisions on the degree of reinforcement shall be specified; in the meantime, other cases where the evidence of reinforcement shall be applied shall be applied and the corresponding improvement shall be made accordingly.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：燕山大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 季剛,劉晶;刑事訴訟中的證據(jù)規(guī)則[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年03期

2 劉宜軍;龔麗梅;;補強證據(jù)規(guī)則在民事審判中的適用[J];發(fā)展研究;2007年12期

3 郭華;口供補強證據(jù)規(guī)則研究[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年03期

4 徐建平;視聽資料的若干問題研究[J];科技創(chuàng)業(yè)月刊;2005年09期

5 龍宗智;印證與自由心證——我國刑事訴訟證明模式[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年02期

6 程志宏;言詞證據(jù)的形成過程──兼評言詞證據(jù)的合法性[J];人民檢察;1997年02期

7 侯為,嚴(yán)彥;民事訴訟中補強證據(jù)問題探討[J];邢臺學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年02期

8 黃松有;證據(jù)開示制度比較研究──兼評我國民事審判實踐中的證據(jù)開示[J];政法論壇;2000年05期

，

本文編號：2507204