犯罪嫌疑人閱卷權研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-02-19 18:57
【摘要】：現(xiàn)代法治國家越來越重視犯罪嫌疑人的主體性地位,在刑事訴訟的過程中充分保障其知情權和訴訟參與權,以期實現(xiàn)控辯平等和程序公正。犯罪嫌疑人是指因涉嫌犯罪而受到刑事追訴的人,在檢察機關向法院對其提起公訴以前的稱謂,即偵查和審查起訴階段對涉嫌犯罪的當事人的稱謂。本論文通過引入社會學中的角色期望理論,分析賦予犯罪嫌疑人閱卷權的法理基礎,重新定義權屬回歸后閱卷權的內(nèi)涵。在對我國賦予犯罪嫌疑人閱卷權的訴訟價值分析基礎上,考察大陸法系國家的閱卷權制度和英美法系國家的證據(jù)開示制度,結合我國的實際情況,構建我國犯罪嫌疑人閱卷權制度。 第一章,從社會學視野下的刑事訴訟角色理論切入,指出公檢法機關在刑事訴訟的過程中存在角色沖突和失調,閱卷權的法理基礎是控辯平等理論和程序主體性理論。犯罪嫌疑人閱卷權權屬理應回歸其本質,在偵查階段和審查起訴階段犯罪嫌疑人享有有限度閱卷的權利,即檢閱卷宗材料及物證等證據(jù)的權利。 第二章,賦予犯罪嫌疑人閱卷權具有重要的訴訟價值,主要表現(xiàn)在三個方面：實現(xiàn)有效辯護的前提、預防冤家錯案的手段、保障犯罪嫌疑人主體性地位的需要。通過分析賦予犯罪嫌疑人閱卷權的訴訟價值,指出賦予犯罪嫌疑人閱卷權的正當性和必要性。 第三章,通過考察大陸法系國家的閱卷權制度和英美法系國家的證據(jù)開示制度,為我國的犯罪嫌疑人閱卷權制度構建提供借鑒。在現(xiàn)有理論和經(jīng)驗的前提下,結合我國的社會環(huán)境和立法現(xiàn)狀逐步構建我國的犯罪嫌疑人閱卷制度。 第四章,賦予犯罪嫌疑人閱卷權具有重要的意義,筆者提出在以下幾個方面構建符合我國國情的犯罪嫌疑人閱卷制度：閱卷的時間和范圍、閱卷的地點和方式、侵犯閱卷權的救濟。
[Abstract]:Modern countries under the rule of law pay more and more attention to the subjective status of criminal suspects and fully guarantee their right to know and participate in proceedings in the process of criminal proceedings in order to achieve equality of prosecution and defense and procedural justice. A criminal suspect is a person who is prosecuted by a criminal for a suspected crime, which is the appellation of the party involved in the suspected crime in the stage of investigation and prosecution before the prosecution is brought to the court by the procuratorial organ. By introducing the theory of role expectation in sociology, this paper analyzes the legal basis of giving criminal suspects the right to read papers, and redefines the connotation of the right of marking after the return of ownership. Based on the analysis of the lawsuit value of the criminal suspect's marking right, this paper investigates the system of the marking right in the countries of the continental law system and the evidence discovery system in the countries of the common law system, and combines the actual situation of our country. Construct the criminal suspect marking right system in our country. In the first chapter, from the perspective of sociology, the author points out that the public security bureau, procuratorate and court organs have conflicts and misalignments in the process of criminal proceedings. The legal basis of the marking right is the theory of equality of prosecution and defense and the theory of procedural subjectivity. The right of criminal suspect's marking right should return to its essence. In the stage of investigation and prosecution, the criminal suspect has the right of limited examination, that is, the right to review the documents and material evidence and other evidence. In the second chapter, giving the criminal suspect the right to read papers has important litigation value, mainly in three aspects: the premise of effective defense, the means of preventing the wrong case of the enemy, and the need to protect the subjective position of the criminal suspect. By analyzing the lawsuit value of giving the criminal suspect the right to read papers, the author points out the legitimacy and necessity of giving the criminal suspect the right to read the paper. The third chapter, through the examination of the civil law system and the common law system of evidence discovery system, for our criminal suspects to read the system of reference. Under the premise of existing theory and experience, combining with the social environment and the current legislative situation of our country, the criminal suspect marking system of our country is constructed step by step. In the fourth chapter, it is of great significance to give the criminal suspect the right to mark the papers. The author puts forward the following aspects: the time and scope of the marking, the place and the way of the marking, and the construction of the system of the marking of the criminal suspect in the following aspects. Relief for infringement of the right to read papers
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2
本文編號：2426767
[Abstract]:Modern countries under the rule of law pay more and more attention to the subjective status of criminal suspects and fully guarantee their right to know and participate in proceedings in the process of criminal proceedings in order to achieve equality of prosecution and defense and procedural justice. A criminal suspect is a person who is prosecuted by a criminal for a suspected crime, which is the appellation of the party involved in the suspected crime in the stage of investigation and prosecution before the prosecution is brought to the court by the procuratorial organ. By introducing the theory of role expectation in sociology, this paper analyzes the legal basis of giving criminal suspects the right to read papers, and redefines the connotation of the right of marking after the return of ownership. Based on the analysis of the lawsuit value of the criminal suspect's marking right, this paper investigates the system of the marking right in the countries of the continental law system and the evidence discovery system in the countries of the common law system, and combines the actual situation of our country. Construct the criminal suspect marking right system in our country. In the first chapter, from the perspective of sociology, the author points out that the public security bureau, procuratorate and court organs have conflicts and misalignments in the process of criminal proceedings. The legal basis of the marking right is the theory of equality of prosecution and defense and the theory of procedural subjectivity. The right of criminal suspect's marking right should return to its essence. In the stage of investigation and prosecution, the criminal suspect has the right of limited examination, that is, the right to review the documents and material evidence and other evidence. In the second chapter, giving the criminal suspect the right to read papers has important litigation value, mainly in three aspects: the premise of effective defense, the means of preventing the wrong case of the enemy, and the need to protect the subjective position of the criminal suspect. By analyzing the lawsuit value of giving the criminal suspect the right to read papers, the author points out the legitimacy and necessity of giving the criminal suspect the right to read the paper. The third chapter, through the examination of the civil law system and the common law system of evidence discovery system, for our criminal suspects to read the system of reference. Under the premise of existing theory and experience, combining with the social environment and the current legislative situation of our country, the criminal suspect marking system of our country is constructed step by step. In the fourth chapter, it is of great significance to give the criminal suspect the right to mark the papers. The author puts forward the following aspects: the time and scope of the marking, the place and the way of the marking, and the construction of the system of the marking of the criminal suspect in the following aspects. Relief for infringement of the right to read papers
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 楊波;;被追訴人閱卷權探究——以閱卷權權屬為基點的展開[J];當代法學;2012年01期
2 陳瑞華;;論被告人的閱卷權[J];當代法學;2013年03期
3 卞建林;林林;;被追訴人主體性權利構成論要[J];金陵法律評論;2007年01期
4 左衛(wèi)民;;中國刑事訴訟模式的本土構建[J];法學研究;2009年02期
5 周長軍;論刑事訴訟的游戲精神——約翰·胡伊青加的游戲理論及其訴訟意義[J];山東大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2004年06期
6 孫長永;;美國刑事訴訟中的證據(jù)開示[J];訴訟法論叢;1999年00期
7 葉青;;從冤假錯案的糾正看中國刑事司法體制的改革動向[J];探索與爭鳴;2011年12期
8 廖中洪;民事程序立法中的國家本位主義批判——對我國民事訴訟立法指導思想的反思[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2002年05期
9 冀祥德;;控辯平等之現(xiàn)代內(nèi)涵解讀[J];政法論壇;2007年06期
10 吳紀奎;;被追訴人閱卷權研究[J];中國刑事法雜志;2010年08期
，本文編號：2426767
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2426767.html
