【摘要】：死刑是懲罰犯罪最嚴(yán)厲的方式之一,死刑的適用關(guān)乎人的生命,一旦執(zhí)行錯(cuò)誤,就會(huì)發(fā)生錯(cuò)殺、濫殺。因此,對(duì)于死刑制度,我國(guó)采取了十分謹(jǐn)慎的態(tài)度。由于死刑案件本身具有特殊性,因而我國(guó)對(duì)于死刑案件的審判程序的規(guī)定要比普通的刑事案件審判程序更加嚴(yán)格。從目前來看,我國(guó)對(duì)于死刑案件審判程序做出了很多特殊性的規(guī)定,例如規(guī)定了死刑案件的審理期限問題,死刑復(fù)核程序等等。但是,還是存在很多有待完善的地方。例如,存在一些死刑案件證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)過于籠統(tǒng),辯護(hù)人的辯護(hù)作用難以充分發(fā)揮,死刑復(fù)核程序缺乏期限限制等缺陷與問題。同時(shí),日本和美國(guó)是發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家中適用死刑制度的典型代表,他們?cè)谒佬踢m用上的特別規(guī)定不同于我國(guó)的死刑審判程序。這些國(guó)家死刑案件的程序和制度規(guī)定對(duì)我國(guó)死刑審判程序的完善與改革具有重要的借鑒意義。我國(guó)可以在參考與借鑒美國(guó)與日本的死刑審判制度的同時(shí),再具體地針對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的有關(guān)死刑審判程序出現(xiàn)的問題進(jìn)行完善。本文一共分為五大部分,第一部分是對(duì)完善我國(guó)死刑審判程序的必要性予以了詳述,第二部分主要闡述了我國(guó)死刑案件審判程序的特別性要求,第三部分重點(diǎn)剖析了我國(guó)現(xiàn)行死刑案件審判制度在各個(gè)方面出現(xiàn)的各種缺陷和矛盾,第四部分簡(jiǎn)單介紹了國(guó)外相類似的制度,第五部分與第三部分相呼應(yīng),主要是為第三部分當(dāng)中提出的各種問題尋找切實(shí)可行的解決方法,為我國(guó)死刑案件審判程序的完善尋找思路,并從各個(gè)方面為我國(guó)公安司法機(jī)關(guān)相關(guān)工作的改進(jìn)提出了對(duì)策和建議。
[Abstract]:Death penalty is one of the most severe ways to punish crime. The application of death penalty is related to human life. Therefore, the death penalty system, China has taken a very cautious attitude. Because of the particularity of death penalty cases, the rules of trial procedure of death penalty cases in our country are more strict than those of ordinary criminal cases. From the current point of view, our country has made a lot of special provisions for the trial procedure of death penalty cases, such as the time limit of the death penalty cases, the death penalty review procedures and so on. However, there are still many areas to be improved. For example, there are some defects and problems such as the standard of proof of death penalty cases is too general, the defense function of the defender is difficult to give full play, the death penalty review procedure lacks the limitation of time limit and so on. At the same time, Japan and the United States are typical representatives of the application of the death penalty in developed countries, their special provisions in the application of the death penalty are different from the death penalty procedure in our country. The procedure and system provisions of death penalty cases in these countries are of great significance to the perfection and reform of the death penalty trial procedure in our country. Our country can refer to and draw lessons from the death penalty trial system of the United States and Japan, and at the same time, concretely aim at the problems of the death penalty trial procedure in our country. This paper is divided into five parts altogether. The first part is about the necessity of perfecting the death penalty trial procedure in our country. The second part mainly expounds the special requirements of the death penalty trial procedure in our country. The third part focuses on the analysis of the current death penalty trial system in China in various aspects of the defects and contradictions, the fourth part of a brief introduction of similar systems abroad, the fifth part and the third part echo. The main purpose is to find practical solutions to the various problems raised in the third part, and to find a way of thinking for the perfection of the trial procedures of death penalty cases in our country. The countermeasures and suggestions are put forward for the improvement of the relevant work of the public security and judicial organs in China from various aspects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉仁文;郭莉;;論死刑復(fù)核法律監(jiān)督的完善[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2012年06期

2 劉仁文;;中國(guó)死刑改革的回顧與展望[J];河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

3 蔣薇;;死刑復(fù)核程序完善路徑之探究——以死刑復(fù)核權(quán)歸位為視角[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年01期

4 王敏遠(yuǎn);;死刑案件的證明“標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”及《刑事訴訟法》的修改[J];法學(xué);2008年07期

5 卞建林;;以死刑案件為切入點(diǎn) 建立程序制裁機(jī)制[J];人民檢察;2007年23期

6 冀祥德;;死刑復(fù)核程序的現(xiàn)代定位 以死刑的程序控制為視角[J];法律適用;2007年05期

7 樊崇義;葉肖華;;死刑的實(shí)體和程序控制[J];中國(guó)司法;2006年08期

8 萬(wàn)毅;;我國(guó)死刑審判制度之檢討與重造[J];西南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

9 陳暉;最高人民法院收回死刑核準(zhǔn)權(quán)的法理學(xué)分析[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

10 張永江,舒洪水;中國(guó)死刑復(fù)核程序的檢討與改進(jìn)[J];河北法學(xué);2005年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2395717