【摘要】：虛假訴訟是近年來(lái)凸顯出來(lái)的一個(gè)司法問(wèn)題,也是實(shí)務(wù)界原創(chuàng)的一個(gè)概念,相關(guān)理論研究還不夠深入,但其滋生、蔓延之勢(shì),已嚴(yán)重的損害訴訟制度內(nèi)在旨意,給司法實(shí)踐帶來(lái)全新挑戰(zhàn)。民事訴訟的目的在于解決平等主體之間的法律糾紛,維護(hù)合法的民事權(quán)益以及民事活動(dòng)的正常秩序。而虛假訴訟背離了“誠(chéng)實(shí)信用”、“權(quán)利不得濫用”的正當(dāng)理念,虛構(gòu)法律事實(shí),通過(guò)偽造、變?cè)熳C據(jù)等非法手段提起無(wú)利之訴,使訴訟功能發(fā)生了異化,嚴(yán)重?cái)_亂和諧社會(huì)秩序構(gòu)筑進(jìn)程,其已不再是真正解決糾紛的途徑,僅僅淪為行為人謀取不法利益的工具,成為了一種極具社會(huì)危害性的違法行為。虛假訴訟是社會(huì)誠(chéng)信道德體系缺位的產(chǎn)物,同時(shí)也是法治形式主義的產(chǎn)物。識(shí)別和治理虛假訴訟,不但要從國(guó)民道德意識(shí)出發(fā),更需要從立法和司法體制上構(gòu)筑起一道道防線,才能有助于行為人正確、理性地行使訴權(quán)、表達(dá)訴求,從而實(shí)現(xiàn)合法利益的均衡保障,更好地體現(xiàn)程序公正與實(shí)質(zhì)公正的統(tǒng)一。本文思路仍大致遵循“提出問(wèn)題——分析問(wèn)題——解決問(wèn)題”的邏輯思路,分部闡述,具體內(nèi)容如下：第一部分,著重介紹虛假訴訟這一本體及與之相關(guān)概念的識(shí)別,通過(guò)概念界定、特征分析,結(jié)合虛假訴訟在審判實(shí)務(wù)中的典型情形進(jìn)行闡述,把握現(xiàn)狀,進(jìn)而對(duì)相關(guān)立法情況進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)要評(píng)析。第二部分,圍繞理念意識(shí)、法律制度、司法運(yùn)行三個(gè)層面對(duì)虛假訴訟存因進(jìn)行深入淺出的剖析,并基于前述成因分析的基礎(chǔ)上,指出虛假訴訟存在的內(nèi)在理論誤區(qū)和邏輯矛盾,歸納、總結(jié)其危害之巨。第三部分,從實(shí)然與應(yīng)然的博弈角度來(lái)分析為何要阻卻虛假訴訟這一行為,剖析解決問(wèn)題的重要性,并從國(guó)際立法趨勢(shì)予以進(jìn)一步分析佐證。第四部分,從司法實(shí)踐與規(guī)制規(guī)則的相互辯證、相互促進(jìn)的角度提出規(guī)制虛假訴訟的相關(guān)建議,對(duì)全文進(jìn)行整合梳理,此部分也是全文主旨目的之所在。
[Abstract]:False litigation is a judicial problem that has been highlighted in recent years, and it is also an original concept in the field of practice. The relevant theoretical research is not deep enough, but its breeding and spreading tendency has seriously damaged the inherent will of the litigation system. It brings a new challenge to judicial practice. The purpose of civil action is to solve the legal disputes between equal subjects and to maintain the legal civil rights and interests and the normal order of civil activities. But the false lawsuit deviates from the legitimate idea of "good faith" and "right must not be abused", fabricates the legal fact, brings the lawsuit of no profit through illegal means such as forgery and alteration of evidence, and makes the lawsuit function dissimilation. Seriously disrupting the construction process of harmonious social order, it is no longer the real way to resolve disputes, it is only a tool for the perpetrator to seek illegal interests, and has become a very harmful illegal behavior. False litigation is the product of the absence of social integrity moral system and the formalism of rule of law. To identify and control the false litigation, we should not only start from the national moral consciousness, but also build a defense line from the legislative and judicial system, in order to help the actor to exercise the right of action correctly and rationally, and to express his demands. In order to achieve a balanced protection of legitimate interests, better reflect the unity of procedural justice and substantive justice. This article still roughly follows the logic thought of "posing problem-analyzing problem-solving problem". The specific contents are as follows: the first part mainly introduces the identification of false litigation and its related concepts. Through the concept definition, the characteristic analysis, the combination false lawsuit in the trial practice typical situation carries on the elaboration, grasps the present situation, then carries on the brief appraisal to the related legislation situation. In the second part, the author analyzes the causes of false litigation from three aspects: concept consciousness, legal system and judicial operation, and points out the inherent theoretical misunderstanding and logic contradiction of false litigation on the basis of the analysis of the causes mentioned above. Sum up, sum up its great harm. The third part analyzes why the action of false litigation should be prevented from the angle of the game of reality and ought to be, analyzes the importance of solving the problem, and further analyzes the evidence from the trend of international legislation. The fourth part, from the judicial practice and the regulation rules mutual dialectical, mutual promotion angle proposed the regulation false lawsuit related suggestion, carries on the conformity to the full text, this part also is the full text main purpose.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李榮梅;;虛假訴訟刑法規(guī)制思辨[J];學(xué)理論;2009年25期

2 李翡;;虛假訴訟行為探析與整治[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年01期

3 尉蘭琴;;試論虛假訴訟[J];隴東學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

4 趙赤;李燕山;;論虛假訴訟的刑法規(guī)制[J];江漢論壇;2010年02期

5 胡蓓;;論虛假訴訟的刑事可罰性及司法應(yīng)對(duì)[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年14期

6 薛瑋;;當(dāng)前民間借貸虛假訴訟案件的認(rèn)定與防范[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年15期

7 畢慧;;論民事虛假訴訟的法律規(guī)制[J];浙江學(xué)刊;2010年03期

8 范水清;;淺談如何防范打擊虛假訴訟[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2010年11期

9 梁婷;;民事虛假訴訟現(xiàn)狀及其規(guī)制[J];黔南民族師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

10 郭亞瓊;;淺議虛假訴訟的法律規(guī)制[J];知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年13期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 本報(bào)記者 董小軍　本報(bào)通訊員 陳海濱 舒沁;警惕虛假訴訟的欺詐[N];寧波日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

2 本報(bào)記者 袁定波;修正刑法解決對(duì)虛假訴訟制裁問(wèn)題[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

3 江蘇省常州市天寧區(qū)人民法院 李霞;虛假訴訟現(xiàn)象亟待引起重視[N];人民法院報(bào);2008年

4 本報(bào)記者 余建華　孟煥良;浙江 刑罰之劍指向虛假訴訟[N];人民法院報(bào);2010年

5 本報(bào)記者 蔣萍　通訊員 吳祿嬋;虛假訴訟可能涉及十宗罪[N];文匯報(bào);2010年

6 媒體評(píng)論員 劉英團(tuán);以刑事制裁應(yīng)對(duì)“虛假訴訟”[N];人民法院報(bào);2010年

7 本報(bào)記者 白龍　張爍;多管齊下嚴(yán)打虛假訴訟[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

8 黃廷旺　紀(jì)明龍;虛假訴訟的成因與防范[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2010年

9 本報(bào)記者 魯晟;虛假訴訟:民事到刑事的嬗變[N];民主與法制時(shí)報(bào);2010年

10 記者 劉慧靜 通訊員 蒲華峰;虛假訴訟 緣何愈演愈烈[N];舟山日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 張昕;虛假訴訟問(wèn)題研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年

2 譚慧;虛假訴訟成因與對(duì)策研究[D];貴州大學(xué);2009年

3 許勤;從司法角度看虛假訴訟的刑法規(guī)制[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

4 項(xiàng)衛(wèi)兵;虛假訴訟行為的刑法規(guī)制[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

5 郝元元;民事虛假訴訟研究[D];河南大學(xué);2012年

6 王s，

本文編號(hào)：2320267