行政訴訟起訴期限立法制度研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-09 10:07
【摘要】：行政訴訟起訴期限是指相對人能夠向法院對行政行為提起行政訴訟的法定期限，沒有法定理由超過這一期限起訴的，相對人將喪失訴權(quán)。由此可見，起訴期限制度關(guān)系到行政相對人權(quán)益的實現(xiàn)，，在行政訴訟程序中具有重要地位。當(dāng)然，起訴期限還關(guān)系到行政法律秩序的穩(wěn)定，行政機關(guān)管理公共事務(wù)要遵守及時高效的原則，以便維護穩(wěn)定的社會秩序。但是，目前我國的行政訴訟起訴期限制度在立法上還存在著許多問題，例如起訴期限的法律規(guī)定內(nèi)容不明確、單行法規(guī)定的起訴期限與復(fù)議申請期限之間存在沖突、違法法律保留等。立法中存在的這許多問題也導(dǎo)致了司法實踐舉步維艱。由此可見，對起訴期限立法制度進行研究極具重要意義。本文擬對起訴期限制度進行系統(tǒng)的梳理，分析起訴期限的基本理論，探討起訴期限的理論基礎(chǔ)和現(xiàn)實依據(jù),并在分析我國起訴期限立法制度的現(xiàn)狀和缺陷、借鑒域外起訴期限立法的經(jīng)驗的基礎(chǔ)上，根據(jù)我國的實際情況，提出完善我國起訴期限立法制度的建議。 全文共分為三部分：序論、正文、結(jié)語。 序論部分闡述了我國行政訴訟起訴期限立法制度的現(xiàn)狀和問題，論述了對起訴期限立法問題進行研究的意義。 正文共分為五章，第一章對起訴期限的基本概念和特征等基礎(chǔ)問題進行了探討，對起訴期限的三要素進行了系統(tǒng)分析。第二章對起訴期限立法制度的理論基礎(chǔ)和現(xiàn)實依據(jù)進行了探討，對權(quán)利救濟理論、行政行為確定力原理和法的安定性理論進行了系統(tǒng)分析，闡述了起訴期限及時追訴違法行政行為、及時穩(wěn)定社會秩序和提高訴訟效益的現(xiàn)實依據(jù)。第三章對起訴期限立法的現(xiàn)狀和缺陷進行了探討，系統(tǒng)分析了我國法律、司法解釋和單行法律中起訴期限的規(guī)定，并總結(jié)了我國起訴期限立法中存在的問題和原因。第四章借鑒英美法系和大陸法系主要國家及我國臺灣地區(qū)的起訴期限立法制度的經(jīng)驗，結(jié)合我國國情，在第五章探討了適合我國行政訴訟起訴期限的立法模式和立法原則，并提出了幾點具體的建議。 結(jié)語部分總結(jié)了起訴期限的研究現(xiàn)狀和深遠意義，在我國依法治國的理念中，對起訴期限立法制度的完善寄予厚望。
[Abstract]:The term of administrative suit refers to the legal period within which the relative party can bring administrative action to the court. If there is no legal reason for suing beyond this time limit, the relative person will lose his right of action. It can be seen from this that the system of suing term relates to the realization of the rights and interests of the administrative counterpart and plays an important role in the administrative procedure. Of course, the period of prosecution is also related to the stability of the administrative legal order, the administrative organs should abide by the principle of timely and efficient management of public affairs, in order to maintain a stable social order. However, at present, there are still many problems in the legal system of administrative litigation in our country. For example, the legal provisions of the term of prosecution are not clear, and there is a conflict between the time limit for prosecution and the time limit for application for reconsideration. Illegal legal reservation, etc. The existence of many problems in the legislation also led to difficulties in judicial practice. Thus, it is of great significance to study the legislative system of prosecution period. This paper intends to make a systematic analysis of the prosecution deadline system, analyzes the basic theory of the prosecution deadline, probes into the theoretical basis and practical basis of the prosecution deadline, and analyzes the present situation and defects of the legislative system of the prosecution deadline in our country. Based on the experience of legislation on the limitation of prosecution abroad and according to the actual situation of our country, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the legislative system of the period of prosecution in our country. The full text is divided into three parts: preface, text and conclusion. In the part of preface, the author expounds the present situation and problems of the legislative system of the term of prosecution in administrative litigation in our country, and discusses the significance of the research on the legislative issue of the term of prosecution. The text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter discusses the basic concepts and characteristics of the period of prosecution, and makes a systematic analysis of the three elements of the period of prosecution. The second chapter discusses the theoretical basis and practical basis of the legislative system of the period of prosecution, and makes a systematic analysis of the theory of right relief, the principle of determination of administrative action and the theory of stability of law. This paper expounds the realistic basis for the prompt prosecution of illegal administrative acts, the timely stabilization of social order and the improvement of the benefit of litigation. The third chapter discusses the current situation and defects of the legislation on the duration of prosecution, systematically analyzes the provisions of the period of prosecution in our country's law, judicial interpretation and separate law, and summarizes the problems and reasons in the legislation of the period of prosecution in our country. The fourth chapter draws lessons from the experience of the main countries of the common law system and the continental law system and the Taiwan area of our country, combining with the national conditions of our country, discusses the legislative model and the legislative principle suitable for the period of the administrative litigation in our country in the fifth chapter. Some concrete suggestions are put forward. The conclusion part summarizes the current situation and far-reaching significance of the study on the term of prosecution. In the concept of running the country according to law, the author places great hopes on the perfection of the legislative system of the period of prosecution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.3
本文編號：2258944
[Abstract]:The term of administrative suit refers to the legal period within which the relative party can bring administrative action to the court. If there is no legal reason for suing beyond this time limit, the relative person will lose his right of action. It can be seen from this that the system of suing term relates to the realization of the rights and interests of the administrative counterpart and plays an important role in the administrative procedure. Of course, the period of prosecution is also related to the stability of the administrative legal order, the administrative organs should abide by the principle of timely and efficient management of public affairs, in order to maintain a stable social order. However, at present, there are still many problems in the legal system of administrative litigation in our country. For example, the legal provisions of the term of prosecution are not clear, and there is a conflict between the time limit for prosecution and the time limit for application for reconsideration. Illegal legal reservation, etc. The existence of many problems in the legislation also led to difficulties in judicial practice. Thus, it is of great significance to study the legislative system of prosecution period. This paper intends to make a systematic analysis of the prosecution deadline system, analyzes the basic theory of the prosecution deadline, probes into the theoretical basis and practical basis of the prosecution deadline, and analyzes the present situation and defects of the legislative system of the prosecution deadline in our country. Based on the experience of legislation on the limitation of prosecution abroad and according to the actual situation of our country, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the legislative system of the period of prosecution in our country. The full text is divided into three parts: preface, text and conclusion. In the part of preface, the author expounds the present situation and problems of the legislative system of the term of prosecution in administrative litigation in our country, and discusses the significance of the research on the legislative issue of the term of prosecution. The text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter discusses the basic concepts and characteristics of the period of prosecution, and makes a systematic analysis of the three elements of the period of prosecution. The second chapter discusses the theoretical basis and practical basis of the legislative system of the period of prosecution, and makes a systematic analysis of the theory of right relief, the principle of determination of administrative action and the theory of stability of law. This paper expounds the realistic basis for the prompt prosecution of illegal administrative acts, the timely stabilization of social order and the improvement of the benefit of litigation. The third chapter discusses the current situation and defects of the legislation on the duration of prosecution, systematically analyzes the provisions of the period of prosecution in our country's law, judicial interpretation and separate law, and summarizes the problems and reasons in the legislation of the period of prosecution in our country. The fourth chapter draws lessons from the experience of the main countries of the common law system and the continental law system and the Taiwan area of our country, combining with the national conditions of our country, discusses the legislative model and the legislative principle suitable for the period of the administrative litigation in our country in the fifth chapter. Some concrete suggestions are put forward. The conclusion part summarizes the current situation and far-reaching significance of the study on the term of prosecution. In the concept of running the country according to law, the author places great hopes on the perfection of the legislative system of the period of prosecution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.3
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 肖艷菲;伍興龍;;論行政訴訟起訴期限[J];研究生法學(xué);2006年05期
2 肖峰昌;;行政訴訟起訴期限若干問題辨析 以最高人民法院司法解釋為視角[J];法律適用;2006年09期
3 竇家應(yīng);;行政訴訟起訴期限審查之檢討[J];法律適用;2007年10期
4 張弘;行政訴訟起訴期限研究[J];法學(xué);2004年02期
5 林俊盛;;論行政訴訟起訴期限的適用范圍——以行政訴訟類型化為視角[J];甘肅行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年06期
6 武俊山;;有關(guān)行政訴訟起訴期限的幾個問題[J];理論探索;2011年05期
7 謝尚果;;行政復(fù)議與行政訴訟銜接機制之反思與重構(gòu)[J];河北法學(xué);2013年02期
8 楊彬權(quán);王周戶;;域外行政訴訟起訴期限制度比較研究——兼論對我國行政訴訟起訴期限的修改與完善[J];河北法學(xué);2014年04期
9 尤春媛,郭文清;我國行政訴訟時效制度存在的問題及對策研究[J];山西大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2005年05期
10 葉敏陽;;淺析行政訴訟起訴期限的理解與適用[J];陜西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2009年S1期
本文編號：2258944
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2258944.html
