財產(chǎn)保全擔保與擔保物權沖突及對策問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-08 21:55
【摘要】：財產(chǎn)保全擔保是指利害關系人或當事人在起訴前或起訴過程中請求法院保全對方財產(chǎn)時,防止申請錯誤給對方造成損失,申請人同時要向法院提供的擔保。財產(chǎn)保全擔保是我國民事立法中的重要組成部分,在我國審判實踐中發(fā)揮的作用日益凸顯。而擔保物權同樣也具有擔保的性質(zhì),它保障了債權人的合法權益能夠得到實現(xiàn)。 因為同樣具有擔保性質(zhì),一個是民事訴訟程序中的擔保,一個是民事實體法中的擔保,在司法實踐中這兩種擔保的客體經(jīng)常因為相同而發(fā)生沖突,即在已提供財產(chǎn)保全擔保的物上再設定擔保物權或者在負擔有擔保物權的財產(chǎn)上再提供財產(chǎn)保全擔保,因而給司法實踐造成困境,同時也不利于當事人或債權人合法權益的保護,故本文選取了財產(chǎn)保全擔保與擔保物權的沖突為研究對象。本文首先對財產(chǎn)保全擔保和擔保物權的沖突進行了理論分析,其次通過筆者自身的實習經(jīng)歷闡述了青島法院對財產(chǎn)保全擔保措施的具體做法,分析了存在的不足及二者沖突對我國現(xiàn)實環(huán)境的沖擊,最后針對二者沖突提出了相應的解決措施。 除引言和結(jié)論外,本文由四部分構(gòu)成。 第一部分是基本概念闡述,著重研究了財產(chǎn)保全擔保和擔保物權的內(nèi)涵以及在性質(zhì)、主體及主體間的法律關系、擔保目的和方式、風險等四個方面的區(qū)別等基本理論問題。 第二部分從理論上分析了財產(chǎn)保全擔保和擔保物權沖突的具體表現(xiàn),包括在已提供財產(chǎn)保全擔保的物上再設定擔保物權和在負擔有擔保物權的財產(chǎn)上再提供財產(chǎn)保全擔保兩個層面。 第三部分以實證研究的方法,選取青島法院對于財產(chǎn)保全擔保的司法實踐作為素材,提出了相關觀點,并進一步從宏觀層面分析了財產(chǎn)保全擔保和擔保物權沖突對我國現(xiàn)實環(huán)境造成的影響。 第四部分在結(jié)合第二部分和第三部分的基礎上,借鑒國外的一些經(jīng)驗,針對財產(chǎn)保全擔保和擔保物權的沖突提出了一些個人的見解。
[Abstract]:Property security is the guarantee that the interested person or the parties request the court to preserve the other party's property before or in the process of suing, and the applicant should provide the guarantee to the court at the same time. Property security is an important part of civil legislation in our country and plays an increasingly important role in our country's trial practice. And security interest also has the nature of security, it guarantees the creditor's legitimate rights and interests can be realized. Because of the same nature of security, one is in civil proceedings, the other is in civil substantive law. In judicial practice, the object of these two guarantees often conflicts because of the same. That is to say, the creation of a security interest on the property that has provided security for the preservation of property or the provision of security in the property bearing the secured right, thus causing difficulties to the judicial practice, At the same time, it is not conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties or creditors, so this paper chooses the conflict between the property preservation security and the security interest as the research object. This paper firstly analyzes the conflict between the property security and the security interest, and then through the author's own practice experience expounds the specific measures of the Qingdao court to the property preservation security measures. This paper analyzes the deficiency and the impact of the two conflicts on the real environment of our country, and finally puts forward the corresponding measures to solve the conflict. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, this paper consists of four parts. The first part is the basic concept, focusing on the property preservation security and security interest in the connotation and in the nature of the subject and the legal relationship between the subject, the purpose and manner of security, risk and other four aspects of the basic theoretical issues. The second part theoretically analyzes the concrete manifestation of the conflict between the property preservation security and the security interest. It includes two levels: the creation of security interest in the property which has provided security for property preservation and the provision of security in property bearing security right. In the third part, the author chooses Qingdao court's judicial practice of property preservation security as the material, and puts forward some related viewpoints. Furthermore, it analyzes the impact of the property preservation guarantee and the security interest conflict on the real environment of our country from the macro level. On the basis of the second part and the third part, the fourth part draws lessons from some foreign experiences and puts forward some personal opinions on the conflict of property preservation security and security interest.
【學位授予單位】：大連海事大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.2;D925.1
本文編號：2258404
[Abstract]:Property security is the guarantee that the interested person or the parties request the court to preserve the other party's property before or in the process of suing, and the applicant should provide the guarantee to the court at the same time. Property security is an important part of civil legislation in our country and plays an increasingly important role in our country's trial practice. And security interest also has the nature of security, it guarantees the creditor's legitimate rights and interests can be realized. Because of the same nature of security, one is in civil proceedings, the other is in civil substantive law. In judicial practice, the object of these two guarantees often conflicts because of the same. That is to say, the creation of a security interest on the property that has provided security for the preservation of property or the provision of security in the property bearing the secured right, thus causing difficulties to the judicial practice, At the same time, it is not conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties or creditors, so this paper chooses the conflict between the property preservation security and the security interest as the research object. This paper firstly analyzes the conflict between the property security and the security interest, and then through the author's own practice experience expounds the specific measures of the Qingdao court to the property preservation security measures. This paper analyzes the deficiency and the impact of the two conflicts on the real environment of our country, and finally puts forward the corresponding measures to solve the conflict. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, this paper consists of four parts. The first part is the basic concept, focusing on the property preservation security and security interest in the connotation and in the nature of the subject and the legal relationship between the subject, the purpose and manner of security, risk and other four aspects of the basic theoretical issues. The second part theoretically analyzes the concrete manifestation of the conflict between the property preservation security and the security interest. It includes two levels: the creation of security interest in the property which has provided security for property preservation and the provision of security in property bearing security right. In the third part, the author chooses Qingdao court's judicial practice of property preservation security as the material, and puts forward some related viewpoints. Furthermore, it analyzes the impact of the property preservation guarantee and the security interest conflict on the real environment of our country from the macro level. On the basis of the second part and the third part, the fourth part draws lessons from some foreign experiences and puts forward some personal opinions on the conflict of property preservation security and security interest.
【學位授予單位】：大連海事大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.2;D925.1
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 沈楊,朱業(yè)明;財產(chǎn)保全的法律性質(zhì)辨析[J];法律適用(國家法官學院學報);2001年04期
2 吳聲華,毛煜煥;財產(chǎn)保全制度中的擔保審查[J];法律適用(國家法官學院學報);2002年10期
3 李漢昌，吳德橋;適用財產(chǎn)保全制度應注意的幾個問題[J];法學評論;1996年04期
4 袁寶成;完善我國民事訴訟擔保制度[J];法學;1989年03期
5 陳福江;民事訴訟保全程序之比較研究[J];廣西廣播電視大學學報;2005年02期
6 陳斯;制度完善:對民事訴訟擔保制度的反思——以一種實務探討的方式展開[J];廣東社會科學;2002年06期
7 黃善文;訴訟財產(chǎn)保全擔保與商業(yè)銀行業(yè)務創(chuàng)新[J];廣東金融學院學報;2005年01期
8 李漢昌，吳德橋;適用財產(chǎn)保全的幾個問題[J];人民司法;1996年05期
9 周翠;;論民事訴訟中的臨時性救濟制度[J];訴訟法論叢;2001年00期
10 劉翠萍;淺議財產(chǎn)保全中的擔保問題[J];中共山西省委黨校學報;2004年04期
，本文編號：2258404
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2258404.html
