發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-28 10:50

【摘要】：不起訴的法律效力關(guān)系到刑事訴訟基本理念的貫徹落實(shí)，但目前我國卻普遍疏于對(duì)不起訴的法律效力進(jìn)行整體性評(píng)價(jià)。由于我國不起訴的法律效力不明確，致使不起訴的價(jià)值沒有得到充分的實(shí)現(xiàn)。因此，研究不起訴制度的法律效力，找出其存在的缺陷和弊端，進(jìn)而提出完善建議，對(duì)立法完善和司法實(shí)踐有重要意義。本文從存疑不起訴、酌定不起訴、附條件不起訴、和解不起訴四個(gè)不起訴的案件出發(fā)，引發(fā)對(duì)不起訴的法律效力的思考。通過分析發(fā)現(xiàn)，這四種不起訴在法律效力方面存在不同程度的問題，，諸如繼續(xù)偵查行為違法，涉嫌對(duì)犯罪嫌疑人進(jìn)行有罪評(píng)價(jià)，效力內(nèi)容不確定，撤銷不起訴決定不合理等等。對(duì)于案例中體現(xiàn)的問題，本文在梳理了我國現(xiàn)行的立法和司法解釋的基礎(chǔ)上，從合理性與合法性兩個(gè)角度對(duì)相關(guān)問題進(jìn)行分析，同時(shí)，在對(duì)相關(guān)問題的爭(zhēng)議觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了評(píng)價(jià)后，提出了完善不起訴法律效力問題的相應(yīng)觀點(diǎn)。首先，明確不起訴僅具有程序性質(zhì)，進(jìn)而否定不起訴決定具有對(duì)被不起訴人進(jìn)行有罪評(píng)價(jià)的效力。其次，明確不起訴的效力內(nèi)容，說明附條件不起訴具有暫時(shí)停止訴訟程序的效力，以及禁止不起訴決定作出后繼續(xù)實(shí)施偵查行為的理由。最后，肯定不起訴應(yīng)當(dāng)具有穩(wěn)定的法律效力，以形成對(duì)檢察機(jī)關(guān)和當(dāng)事人訴訟行為的有效約束。第一，對(duì)重新啟動(dòng)訴訟程序進(jìn)行限制，包括對(duì)證據(jù)的來源，重新起訴進(jìn)行時(shí)間和次數(shù)進(jìn)行限制等；第二，明確不起訴的異議主體，避免因糾正不起訴決定而影響不起訴法律效力的穩(wěn)定；第三，設(shè)置相應(yīng)的制約程序，避免因異議權(quán)的行使而影響不起訴決定的法律效力穩(wěn)定。不同的不起訴決定具有不同的法律效力，因此，對(duì)于上述的不起訴法律效力問題，本文針對(duì)不同種類的不起訴決定提出了不同的改進(jìn)措施。
[Abstract]:The legal effect of non-prosecution is related to the implementation of the basic concept of criminal procedure, but at present our country is generally neglecting to evaluate the legal effect of non-prosecution. Because the legal effect of non-prosecution in our country is not clear, the value of non-prosecution has not been fully realized. Therefore, it is of great significance for legislative perfection and judicial practice to study the legal effect of non-prosecution system, find out its defects and drawbacks, and then put forward suggestions for perfection. This paper starts from the four cases of no prosecution, no prosecution with conditions and no prosecution, which leads to the reflection on the legal effect of non-prosecution. Through analysis, it is found that these four kinds of non-prosecution have different degrees of problems in the legal effect, such as continuing to investigate illegal behavior, suspected guilty evaluation of criminal suspects, uncertain content of effectiveness, unreasonable decision to rescind non-prosecution, and so on. For the problems reflected in the case, this paper analyzes the relevant issues from the perspectives of rationality and legality on the basis of combing the current legislative and judicial interpretations of our country. At the same time, after evaluating the controversial views of the relevant issues, Put forward the corresponding viewpoint of perfecting the legal effect of non-prosecution. First of all, it is clear that non-prosecution is only procedural, and then negates that the decision of non-prosecution has the effect of evaluating the guilt of the person who is not prosecuted. Secondly, it clarifies the effective content of non-prosecution, explains that the conditional non-prosecution has the effect of suspending the proceedings, and prohibits the reason of continuing to carry out the investigation after the decision of non-prosecution is made. Finally, it is affirmed that non-prosecution should have a stable legal effect to form an effective constraint on procuratorial organs and litigants. First, to restrict the restarting of proceedings, including the source of evidence, the time and times of reprosecution, and so on; second, to clarify the main dissenting parties who do not prosecute. Avoid to correct the non-prosecution decision and affect the stability of the legal effect of non-prosecution; third, set up the corresponding restriction procedures to avoid the right of dissent to affect the legal effectiveness of non-prosecution decision stability. Different non-prosecution decisions have different legal effects. Therefore, for the above-mentioned legal effects of non-prosecution, this paper puts forward different improvement measures for different types of non-prosecution decisions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 鄭麗萍;;附條件不起訴之進(jìn)一步構(gòu)建——基于我國《刑事訴訟法修正案》之思考[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年09期

2 張進(jìn);;未成年人附條件不起訴制度思考——以與刑事和解的交叉重合為視角[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年04期

3 李燁;;存疑不起訴的適用[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年19期

4 陳宇;蘇定子;;對(duì)未成年人要適時(shí)適用相對(duì)不起訴[J];中國檢察官;2008年10期

5 鞠佳佳;;關(guān)于刑事訴訟中“重新起訴”制度的思考[J];中國檢察官;2012年05期

6 盧希;;附條件不起訴制度實(shí)證分析[J];中國檢察官;2012年19期

7 苗欣蘭;不起訴的效力與被害人自訴權(quán)的沖突及解決辦法[J];檢察實(shí)踐;2001年04期

本文編號(hào)：2209172