【摘要】：測(cè)謊結(jié)論能否應(yīng)用于訴訟之中，其證據(jù)屬性如何？這個(gè)問(wèn)題自測(cè)謊科學(xué)被發(fā)明以來(lái)在世界各國(guó)的理論及實(shí)務(wù)界中都存在著爭(zhēng)議，美國(guó)在這個(gè)問(wèn)題上顯示出開(kāi)放的開(kāi)度，同意測(cè)謊結(jié)論有條件地應(yīng)用在民事、刑事訴訟之中；而我國(guó)對(duì)于測(cè)謊結(jié)論的規(guī)定只有最高檢《關(guān)于CPS多道心理測(cè)試鑒定結(jié)論能否作為訴訟證據(jù)使用的問(wèn)題批復(fù)》中曾作出規(guī)定，認(rèn)為其可以在刑事訴訟中起幫助審判的作用。目前來(lái)說(shuō)，測(cè)謊結(jié)論在民事訴訟中尚無(wú)法規(guī)或相關(guān)司法解釋定位其在司法審判中的作用。為了明白其是否具有證據(jù)屬性及能否應(yīng)用在民事訴訟之中，本文通過(guò)分析測(cè)謊結(jié)論的科學(xué)性及相關(guān)理論研究，再對(duì)比借鑒美國(guó)關(guān)于測(cè)謊結(jié)論的相關(guān)制度，得出測(cè)謊結(jié)論具備證據(jù)屬性，是可以作為輔助證據(jù)有條件地應(yīng)用于民事訴訟之中的結(jié)論。 文章第一部分主要介紹測(cè)謊結(jié)論的概念、特征及目前國(guó)際上對(duì)于其的相關(guān)理論及實(shí)物研究情況，探討測(cè)謊結(jié)論的本質(zhì)所在。同時(shí)列舉支持測(cè)謊結(jié)論成為法定證據(jù)的意見(jiàn)與拒絕測(cè)謊結(jié)論成為法定證據(jù)的意見(jiàn)，分析各自道理。 文章第二部分主要列舉美國(guó)對(duì)測(cè)謊結(jié)論作出規(guī)定的有代表性的判例法及部分法院對(duì)于測(cè)謊結(jié)論的使用意見(jiàn)，結(jié)合我國(guó)相關(guān)情況，提出美國(guó)使用測(cè)謊結(jié)論對(duì)我國(guó)的借鑒意義。 文章第三部分承接美國(guó)應(yīng)用情況對(duì)我國(guó)的借鑒，提出不同類(lèi)型能夠應(yīng)用測(cè)謊結(jié)論的案例，分析測(cè)謊結(jié)論存在的必要性。再結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)外研究情況，歸納出測(cè)謊結(jié)論應(yīng)用于民事訴訟中的條件及程序，，最后得出結(jié)論，即測(cè)謊結(jié)論可以作為輔助證據(jù)在民事訴訟中期幫助審判的作用。
[Abstract]:Since the invention of polygraph science, there have been disputes in the theoretical and practical circles all over the world. The United States has shown openness on this issue, agreeing that polygraph conclusions can be conditionally applied in civil and criminal proceedings; and China has a dispute on polygraph. Only the Supreme Procurator's Reply to the Question on the Use of CPS Multichannel Psychological Testing Results as Litigation Evidence has stipulated that polygraph conclusions can help the trial in criminal proceedings. In order to understand whether it has the attribute of evidence and whether it can be used in civil litigation, this paper analyzes the scientificity of Polygraph Conclusion and related theoretical research, and then draws a conclusion that Polygraph Conclusion has the attribute of evidence, which can be used as auxiliary evidence conditionally in civil litigation. Conclusion.
The first part of the article mainly introduces the concept of polygraph conclusion, its characteristics and the current international research on its related theory and practical situation, discusses the essence of polygraph conclusion.
The second part of the article mainly enumerates the representative case law of the United States and the opinions of some courts on the use of lie detection conclusion. Combining with the relevant situation in China, the paper puts forward the reference significance of the use of lie detection conclusion in the United States for our country.
In the third part of the article, taking the experience of the United States for reference, the author puts forward different types of cases that can be used to analyze the necessity of the existence of polygraph conclusion. The role of evidence in helping a trial in the middle of a civil lawsuit.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.13

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 宋英輝;關(guān)于測(cè)謊證據(jù)有關(guān)問(wèn)題的探討[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1999年05期

2 張澤濤;美國(guó)測(cè)謊制度的發(fā)展過(guò)程對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];法商研究;2003年06期

3 樊崇義;鎖正杰;吳宏耀;陳永生;;刑事證據(jù)前沿問(wèn)題研究[J];證據(jù)學(xué)論壇;2000年00期

本文編號(hào)：2188042