【摘要】：刑事抗訴工作是人民檢察院審判監(jiān)督工作的重要內容,對于保障法院依法行使審判權發(fā)揮著不可替代的監(jiān)督作用,但是,我國的刑事抗訴工作在司法實踐中尚未完全按照刑事抗訴制度的理論設想發(fā)揮作用,刑事抗訴制度的建構本身也存在不合理之處。調研報告形成之前,筆者逐一分析了湖南省檢察機關2008年至2012年無罪判決案件樣本,發(fā)現(xiàn)湖南省這一期間無罪案件抗訴工作存在以下問題：提出抗訴比例過高,濫用抗訴權；抗訴質量不高,改判率偏低；少數(shù)案件該抗不抗,抗訴權缺位。形成問題的原因較為復雜,但最為直接的原因主要有以下三點：一是刑事訴訟中的抗訴標準模糊,刑法的罪狀描述尚有不確定之處；二是檢察機關內部運行機制不暢,三是法院內部體制失調。要改變這一現(xiàn)狀,首先要通過對刑法和刑事訴訟法的修改,明確抗訴標準,減少檢察機關面對無罪案件時的決定是否抗訴的兩難抉擇；其次是要理順檢察機關內部運行機制,貫徹抗訴的檢委會決策機制和向上級院請示的制度,慎重提出抗訴,防止抗訴權的濫用,同時對于法院判決確有錯誤的,也要敢于抗訴,善于抗訴。再次是通過完善法院的內部考核機制和取消法院內部請示制度,避免抗訴權流于形式,保證抗訴的效果。
[Abstract]:Criminal protest work is an important part of the trial supervision work of the People's Procuratorate, which plays an irreplaceable role in ensuring the court to exercise its jurisdiction according to law. However, the criminal protest work in our country has not yet played its role in judicial practice according to the theoretical assumption of the criminal protest system, and the construction of the criminal protest system itself. Before the formation of the investigation report, the author analyzed the sample of innocent judgments of Hunan procuratorial organs from 2008 to 2012 one by one, and found that the following problems existed in the protest work of innocent cases in Hunan Province during this period: the proportion of protest was too high, the right of protest was abused; the quality of protest was not high, and the rate of sentence change was low in a few cases; The reasons for the formation of the problem are relatively complicated, but the most direct reasons are as follows: first, the standard of protest in criminal proceedings is vague, the description of the criminal law is still uncertain; second, the internal operation mechanism of the procuratorial organs is not smooth; third, the internal system of the court is out of order. To change this situation, first of all, there are still some uncertainties. It is necessary to clarify the standard of protest and reduce the dilemma of the procuratorial organs in deciding whether to protest in the face of innocent cases by amending the criminal law and the criminal procedural law; secondly, it is necessary to straighten out the internal operation mechanism of the procuratorial organs, implement the decision-making mechanism of the Procuratorial Committee for protest and the system of appealing to the superior court, put forward protest cautiously and prevent the abuse of the right of protest. At the same time, we should dare to protest and be good at protesting if the judgment of the court is wrong. Thirdly, we should improve the internal examination mechanism of the court and cancel the system of petition within the court to avoid the right of protest becoming mere formality and ensure the effect of protest.
【學位授予單位】：湖南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 蘭耀軍;刑事抗訴程序中兩類問題評析[J];安徽廣播電視大學學報;2004年03期

2 羅輝;晏禮蠡;;刑事抗訴的尷尬境地探討[J];重慶工商大學學報(西部論壇);2008年S1期

3 張利兆;王焰明;張兆松;;刑事抗訴權運行機制的現(xiàn)狀及其完善——以寧波市檢察機關2006-2008年刑事抗訴案件為視角[J];法治研究;2009年11期

4 零霄宇;;制約檢察機關刑事抗訴工作的問題、原因及對策初探[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2011年04期

5 周永年;;刑事二審程序中履行檢察職能的若干問題研究[J];華東政法學院學報;2006年03期

6 范仲瑾;;當前刑事抗訴存在的問題及對策[J];中國檢察官;2007年03期

7 王軍;李景晗;張曉津;陳娟;;刑事抗訴工作問題與對策研究[J];人民檢察;2006年12期

8 冀文孝;呂晉源;;制約基層檢察院刑事抗訴工作的因素[J];人民檢察;2006年23期

9 張玉軍;;基層檢察院刑事抗訴工作中存在的主要問題、原因及對策[J];天津市政法管理干部學院學報;2009年S1期

10 于洋;;改進刑事抗訴工作的思考[J];人民檢察;2012年10期

，

本文編號：2177318