我國民事舉證時限制度研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-10 22:30
【摘要】：舉證時限制度是舉證責(zé)任制度的重要組成部分，是民事審判程序中的重要內(nèi)容。它是落實我國民事舉證責(zé)任制度以及審限制度不可缺少的組成部分，也是實現(xiàn)程序公正與提高司法效益的關(guān)鍵。2001年《最高人民法院關(guān)于民事訴訟證據(jù)若干問題的規(guī)定》以司法解釋的形式確立了舉證時限制度，結(jié)束了我國長期以來實行的當(dāng)事人可以在訴訟中的任何階段隨時舉證的歷史，實行證據(jù)適時提出主義，這在民事訴訟制度改革歷史上具有里程碑的意義。2008年最高人民法院又發(fā)布了《關(guān)于適用關(guān)于民事訴訟證據(jù)若干問題的規(guī)定中有關(guān)舉證時限規(guī)定的通知》是對舉證時限制度的進一步完善。這一制度雖然對促進我國司法改革進一步向著公正和高效的方向發(fā)展提供了有利的法律保障，但這一制度所體現(xiàn)的程序正義及提高訴訟效率的價值理念，在司法實踐中與實現(xiàn)案件的實體正義發(fā)生沖突，影響了舉證時限作為一項程序制度所能發(fā)揮的獨特作用。因此，舉證時限制度還有待進一步完善。鑒于此，本文從民事訴訟舉證時限制度的概念和性質(zhì)入手，通過對舉證時限的功能以及價值進行分析，再結(jié)合自舉證時限制度設(shè)立以來在我國司法實踐中存在的問題，力求從多方面對舉證時限制度存在的問題進行原因分析，并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出一些完善我國舉證時限制度的舉措，從而進一步完善我國的舉證時限制度。 正文第一章主要論述舉證時限制度的基本問題。包括舉證時限制度的概念，性質(zhì)，種類。通過對舉證時限與舉證責(zé)任制度的區(qū)別以及舉證時限制度性質(zhì)的分析更進一步理解舉證時限的涵義。 第二章主要分析了舉證時限制度得以建立的法理基礎(chǔ)，將舉證時限制度放入整個民事訴訟程序中進行分析，明確了舉證時限制度的重大意義，進一步分析了舉證時限的價值目標(biāo)。 第三章論述了我國舉證時限制度確立的基本內(nèi)容以及存在的問題。首先，從舉證時限的確定方式，舉證時限與證據(jù)交換，舉證時限與證據(jù)失權(quán)，新的證據(jù)四個方面，重要論述了舉證時限的兩種確定方式，以及與證據(jù)交換的關(guān)系，證據(jù)失權(quán)所引起的法律后果以及例外情況“新發(fā)現(xiàn)的證據(jù)”。其次，分析了我國現(xiàn)行舉證時限制度存在的問題，同時也分析了存在問題的原因：舉證時限制度與實體公正發(fā)生沖突，“重實體，輕程序”觀念的影響，限制了舉證時限制度積極發(fā)揮其作用。 第四章，完善我國舉證時限制度的構(gòu)想。以前三章的分析論述為基礎(chǔ)，，指出完善舉證時限制度所要考慮的因素，對舉證時限制度的完善提出了建議。以立法形式明確規(guī)定舉證時限制度，注重吸收我國司法實踐中的經(jīng)驗，從法律規(guī)范本身出發(fā)，進一步完善我國民事舉證時限制度。
[Abstract]:The system of time limit of proof is an important part of the system of burden of proof and an important content of civil trial procedure. It is an indispensable part of the implementation of the civil burden of proof system and the system of trial limit in China. It is also the key to realize procedural justice and improve judicial efficiency. In 2001, the Supreme people's Court established the system of time limit of proof in the form of judicial interpretation. Putting an end to the long history of the parties being able to present evidence at any stage of the proceedings, and practicing the doctrine of timely presentation of evidence. This is a milestone in the history of civil litigation system reform. In 2008, the Supreme people's Court issued the notice on the Application of certain provisions on evidence in Civil Litigation concerning the time limit of proof. Further improvement of the time limit system. Although this system provides favorable legal guarantee to promote the development of judicial reform in China towards the direction of justice and efficiency, it embodies the value concept of procedural justice and improving the efficiency of litigation. In judicial practice, there is conflict with the realization of substantive justice in cases, which affects the unique role that the time limit of proof can play as a procedural system. Therefore, the system of the time limit of proof needs to be further improved. In view of this, this paper starts with the concept and nature of the system of the time limit of proof in civil litigation, through the analysis of the function and value of the time limit of proof, and then combines the problems existing in the judicial practice of our country since the establishment of the system of the time limit of proof. This paper tries to make an analysis of the causes of the problems existing in the system of the time limit of proof from many aspects, and puts forward some measures to perfect the system of the time limit of proof in our country on this basis, so as to further perfect the system of the time limit of proof in our country. The first chapter mainly discusses the basic problems of the time limit of proof system. Including the concept, nature and category of the system of time limit of proof. Through the analysis of the difference between the time limit of proof and the system of burden of proof, and the analysis of the nature of the system of proof time limit, the meaning of the time limit of proof is further understood. The second chapter mainly analyzes the legal basis of the establishment of the system of the time limit of proof, puts the system of the time limit of proof into the whole civil procedure for analysis, and clarifies the great significance of the system of the time limit of proof. The paper further analyzes the value goal of the time limit of proof. The third chapter discusses the basic content and existing problems of the establishment of the time limit of proof system in our country. First of all, from four aspects of the determination of the time limit of proof, the time limit of proof and the exchange of evidence, the time limit of proof and the loss of power of evidence, the paper discusses the two ways of determining the time limit of proof and the relationship between the time limit of proof and the exchange of evidence. The legal consequences of the loss of power of evidence and the exception of "newly discovered evidence". Secondly, it analyzes the problems existing in the present system of proof in our country, and at the same time, analyzes the causes of the problems: the conflict between the system of time of proof and the justice of the entity, the influence of the concept of "attaching importance to substance and neglecting the procedure". Limit the time limit of proof system to play its role. The fourth chapter, consummates our country proof time limit system the idea. Based on the analysis of the previous three chapters, this paper points out the factors to be considered in perfecting the system of the time limit of proof, and puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of the system of the time limit of proof. In the form of legislation, the system of the time limit of proof is clearly stipulated, and the system of civil time limit of proof in our country is further perfected from the point of view of the legal norm itself, focusing on absorbing the experience of judicial practice in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D925.1
本文編號：2176405
[Abstract]:The system of time limit of proof is an important part of the system of burden of proof and an important content of civil trial procedure. It is an indispensable part of the implementation of the civil burden of proof system and the system of trial limit in China. It is also the key to realize procedural justice and improve judicial efficiency. In 2001, the Supreme people's Court established the system of time limit of proof in the form of judicial interpretation. Putting an end to the long history of the parties being able to present evidence at any stage of the proceedings, and practicing the doctrine of timely presentation of evidence. This is a milestone in the history of civil litigation system reform. In 2008, the Supreme people's Court issued the notice on the Application of certain provisions on evidence in Civil Litigation concerning the time limit of proof. Further improvement of the time limit system. Although this system provides favorable legal guarantee to promote the development of judicial reform in China towards the direction of justice and efficiency, it embodies the value concept of procedural justice and improving the efficiency of litigation. In judicial practice, there is conflict with the realization of substantive justice in cases, which affects the unique role that the time limit of proof can play as a procedural system. Therefore, the system of the time limit of proof needs to be further improved. In view of this, this paper starts with the concept and nature of the system of the time limit of proof in civil litigation, through the analysis of the function and value of the time limit of proof, and then combines the problems existing in the judicial practice of our country since the establishment of the system of the time limit of proof. This paper tries to make an analysis of the causes of the problems existing in the system of the time limit of proof from many aspects, and puts forward some measures to perfect the system of the time limit of proof in our country on this basis, so as to further perfect the system of the time limit of proof in our country. The first chapter mainly discusses the basic problems of the time limit of proof system. Including the concept, nature and category of the system of time limit of proof. Through the analysis of the difference between the time limit of proof and the system of burden of proof, and the analysis of the nature of the system of proof time limit, the meaning of the time limit of proof is further understood. The second chapter mainly analyzes the legal basis of the establishment of the system of the time limit of proof, puts the system of the time limit of proof into the whole civil procedure for analysis, and clarifies the great significance of the system of the time limit of proof. The paper further analyzes the value goal of the time limit of proof. The third chapter discusses the basic content and existing problems of the establishment of the time limit of proof system in our country. First of all, from four aspects of the determination of the time limit of proof, the time limit of proof and the exchange of evidence, the time limit of proof and the loss of power of evidence, the paper discusses the two ways of determining the time limit of proof and the relationship between the time limit of proof and the exchange of evidence. The legal consequences of the loss of power of evidence and the exception of "newly discovered evidence". Secondly, it analyzes the problems existing in the present system of proof in our country, and at the same time, analyzes the causes of the problems: the conflict between the system of time of proof and the justice of the entity, the influence of the concept of "attaching importance to substance and neglecting the procedure". Limit the time limit of proof system to play its role. The fourth chapter, consummates our country proof time limit system the idea. Based on the analysis of the previous three chapters, this paper points out the factors to be considered in perfecting the system of the time limit of proof, and puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of the system of the time limit of proof. In the form of legislation, the system of the time limit of proof is clearly stipulated, and the system of civil time limit of proof in our country is further perfected from the point of view of the legal norm itself, focusing on absorbing the experience of judicial practice in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D925.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王福華;民事訴訟誠實信用原則論[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);1999年04期
2 李浩;;論舉證時限與訴訟效率[J];法學(xué)家;2005年03期
3 蔡虹;釋明權(quán):基礎(chǔ)透視與制度構(gòu)建[J];法學(xué)評論;2005年01期
4 劉加良;;論我國民事被告答辯制度的缺陷與改進[J];廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年06期
5 孫衛(wèi)國;試析舉證明效制度的完善[J];河北法學(xué);2000年04期
6 葉自強;關(guān)于民事訴訟舉證時限問題的探討[J];河北法學(xué);2000年06期
7 張衛(wèi)平;論民事訴訟中失權(quán)的正義性[J];法學(xué)研究;1999年06期
8 鄧天江;張銳峰;;從“客觀真實”到“法律真實”[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年05期
9 寇曉燕;淺議民事訴訟舉證時限制度[J];樂山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年05期
10 肖良平;;論我國民事訴訟答辯失權(quán)制度的構(gòu)建[J];求索;2006年01期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條
1 趙丹;我國舉證時限制度研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年
2 姚洪宇;我國舉證時限制度完善[D];中央民族大學(xué);2011年
3 孫永全;我國民事舉證時限制度的反思與完善[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年
4 王衍琴;舉證時限制度之反思[D];山東大學(xué);2008年
5 高佳;民事訴訟舉證時限制度研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2009年
本文編號：2176405
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2176405.html
