本文選題：法院調(diào)解 + 訴訟調(diào)解��； 參考：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國的法院訴訟調(diào)解制度被譽(yù)為東方經(jīng)驗(yàn),是一項(xiàng)重要的司法制度,在中國有著源遠(yuǎn)流長的歷史,它推動(dòng)了社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)的建設(shè),加快了經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展。但是隨著市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的深入發(fā)展,法院訴訟調(diào)解制度的設(shè)計(jì)在面對(duì)越來越多樣化的社會(huì)矛盾時(shí),已經(jīng)產(chǎn)生出許多問題。本文首先從法院訴訟調(diào)解制度的概念著手,分析我國的法院訴訟調(diào)解制度的具體內(nèi)容、特征及價(jià)值功能。第二,比較我國臺(tái)灣地區(qū)以及其他國家的調(diào)解制度,主要為：美國的附設(shè)調(diào)解制度及和解制度、德國的和解制度、日本的調(diào)停與訴訟和解制度以及我國臺(tái)灣地區(qū)的和解制度。第三,對(duì)我國現(xiàn)行法院訴訟調(diào)解制度存在的現(xiàn)狀及缺失進(jìn)行分析研究。最后,結(jié)合我國臺(tái)灣地區(qū)及他國先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn),進(jìn)行仔細(xì)的比較分析,借鑒其可取之處,結(jié)合我國法院訴訟調(diào)解自身特點(diǎn),提出完善我國法院調(diào)解制度的建議,有效彌補(bǔ)我國法院訴訟調(diào)解制度的不足,包括調(diào)審分離；取消查明事實(shí)、分清是非的原則；明確合法原則；避免“強(qiáng)制調(diào)解”現(xiàn)在的大量產(chǎn)生；完善調(diào)解程序性規(guī)范以及明確調(diào)解協(xié)議的法律效力等,從原則性規(guī)定到具體程序的完善都提出了一些建議。
[Abstract]:China's court litigation mediation system, known as the oriental experience, is an important judicial system, which has a long history in China. It promotes the construction of a harmonious socialist society and speeds up the development of the economy. However, with the further development of market economy, the design of court litigation mediation system has produced many problems in the face of more and more diverse social contradictions. This paper begins with the concept of court litigation mediation system, and analyzes the concrete content, characteristics and value function of court litigation mediation system in our country. Secondly, the author compares the mediation systems in Taiwan and other countries, mainly as follows: the United States' affiliated mediation system and conciliation system, Germany's conciliation system, Japan's mediation and litigation conciliation system, and China's Taiwan region's conciliation system. Third, the present situation and deficiency of our country's current court litigation mediation system are analyzed and studied. Finally, according to the advanced experience of Taiwan and other countries, this paper makes a careful comparative analysis, draws lessons from its merits, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the court mediation system of our country, in combination with the characteristics of our country's court litigation mediation. Effectively make up for the deficiency of the mediation system of our country's court litigation, including the separation of trial and appeal, cancel the principle of finding out the facts and distinguish right from wrong, clarify the principle of legality, avoid the large amount of "compulsory mediation" at present; To perfect the procedural norms of mediation and clarify the legal effect of mediation agreement, some suggestions are put forward from the principle stipulation to the perfection of concrete procedure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.14

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李浩;;先行調(diào)解制度研究[J];江海學(xué)刊;2013年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 復(fù)旦大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授 博士生導(dǎo)師 章武生;[N];人民法院報(bào);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2098716