本文選題：小額訴訟制度 + 比較借鑒��； 參考：《寧夏大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：第二次世界大戰(zhàn)之后,為解決訴訟膨脹問題,許多發(fā)達國家陸續(xù)展開以追求司法公正和司法效率均衡為主題的民事司法改革運動,期中,小額訴訟制度憑借其特有的低成本、高效率等特點解決了大量的小額輕微民事糾紛,有利于緩解法院審判壓力,有助于實現(xiàn)即時審判等價值優(yōu)勢被各發(fā)達國家紛紛積極采用。 我國的司法體制改革呼聲由來已久,在民事司法領域有關審判制度改革研究也不是新鮮話題了,隨著《新民事訴訟法》的問世,小額訴訟制度也終于在歷經數(shù)年的理論探索和實踐摸索的基礎上以法律規(guī)定的形式確立了。相關規(guī)定的設計,是對我國前期研究的總結和對我國傳統(tǒng)審判程序一大創(chuàng)新,受到了法學界乃至普通民眾的熱切關注,期間有關該規(guī)定的不足也受到熱議。 本文的寫作主要由以下四方面內容組成,首先是制度概述,針對小額訴訟制度的概念、特征和價值目標等內容做介紹；其次是小額訴訟制度的比較解讀,主要介紹具有代表性的幾個國家和地區(qū)關于小額訴訟制度的運行情況并與我國實踐結合,對比差異并小結借鑒之處；第三部分總結目前理論和實踐兩方面研究中存在的問題并對原因進行反思；文章最后部分理論聯(lián)系實際,在民事訴訟法基礎上提出運行的完善建議。
[Abstract]:After the second World War, in order to solve the problem of litigation expansion, many developed countries launched the civil judicial reform movement, which focused on the pursuit of judicial justice and the balance of judicial efficiency. In the interim, the small claims litigation system with its unique low cost. The characteristics of high efficiency have solved a large number of minor civil disputes, which is helpful to relieve the pressure of court trial, and help to realize the value advantage of instant trial, which has been adopted actively by developed countries one after another. China's judicial system reform has a long history, and the research on the judicial system reform in the field of civil justice is no longer a new topic. With the advent of the "New Civil procedure Law", The system of minor action has finally been established in the form of legal regulations on the basis of several years of theoretical exploration and practical exploration. The design of the relevant regulations is a summary of the previous research in our country and a great innovation to the traditional trial procedure of our country, which has been paid close attention to by the legal circles and even the ordinary people, and the insufficiency of this provision has also been hot discussed during this period. The writing of this paper is mainly composed of the following four aspects: firstly, it is an overview of the system, which introduces the concept, characteristics and value objectives of the small claims system; secondly, it is the comparative interpretation of the small claims litigation system. This paper mainly introduces the operation of several representative countries and regions on the system of small claims and combines it with the practice of our country, compares the differences and summarizes the points for reference. The third part summarizes the problems existing in the current theoretical and practical studies and reflects on the reasons. Finally, the author puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of the operation on the basis of the civil procedure law.
【學位授予單位】：寧夏大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 朱景文,斯圖爾特·馬考利;關于比較法社會學的對話[J];比較法研究;1998年01期

2 熊躍敏;日本民事訴訟中的小額訴訟程序概述──兼論我國小額訴訟程序的構建[J];當代法學;2002年05期

3 許尚豪;朱呈義;;我國臺灣地區(qū)小額訴訟程序述評及啟示[J];法律適用;2006年09期

4 范愉;;訴前調解與法院的社會責任 從司法社會化到司法能動主義[J];法律適用;2007年11期

5 章武生;民事簡易程序中的公正與效益[J];法學;2003年08期

6 王宏彬;齊楠;;日本的小額訴訟制度——兼論我國小額訴訟程序的構建[J];法制與社會;2007年09期

7 廖中洪;;小額訴訟立案標準與受理規(guī)則比較研究——兼論我國小額訴訟程序的立法完善[J];法治研究;2012年09期

8 劉仲屹;王保民;;小額訴訟程序及其在我國民事訴訟法修改中的完善[J];比較法研究;2012年05期

9 張鋼;;對小額訴訟制度的幾點思考[J];法制與社會;2012年31期

10 何哲;李昊東;;新法視域下的我國小額訴訟研究[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年04期

，

本文編號：2094050