本文選題：環(huán)境公益訴訟 + 起訴主體�。� 參考：《廣西社會科學》2013年07期

【摘要】：雖然我國新的《民事訴訟法》已經(jīng)規(guī)定了公益訴訟的條款,但是該條款只籠統(tǒng)賦予了"法律規(guī)定的機關(guān)和有關(guān)組織"有起訴權(quán)。根據(jù)我國已有的環(huán)境公益訴訟案件處理的經(jīng)驗,并借鑒國外環(huán)境公益訴訟的先進立法,"法律規(guī)定的機關(guān)和有關(guān)組織"可以明確為檢察機關(guān),政府不宜作為起訴主體;有關(guān)組織可以明確為依法成立的環(huán)保組織;公民可以作為起訴主體。對于多元化的起訴主體,各起訴主體都具有自身的優(yōu)劣性,環(huán)保組織相比檢察機關(guān)、公民、政府更具有起訴的優(yōu)越性,可以處于第一序位,檢察機關(guān)處于第二序位,公民處于第三序位。立法機關(guān)應盡快完善起訴主體并出臺相應的起訴程序,從而使環(huán)境公益訴訟真正有效地發(fā)揮其價值,為促進人與自然和諧發(fā)展、構(gòu)建兩型社會以及建設生態(tài)文明提供堅實的法律保障。
[Abstract]:Although the new Civil procedure Law of our country has stipulated the provision of public interest litigation, this clause only gives "the organs and related organizations stipulated by law" the right to sue in general. According to the experience of handling environmental public interest litigation cases in our country, and drawing lessons from the advanced legislation of foreign environmental public interest litigation, the "organs and related organizations stipulated by law" can be defined as procuratorial organs, and the government should not be the main body of prosecution; Relevant organizations may be clearly established as environmental protection organizations according to law; citizens may act as subject of prosecution. For a plurality of prosecution subjects, each prosecution subject has its own advantages and disadvantages. Environmental protection organizations have more advantages than procuratorial organs, citizens, and governments, and can be placed in the first order and procuratorial organs in the second order. Citizens are in the third order. The legislature should perfect the subject of prosecution and issue the corresponding prosecution procedure as soon as possible, so that the environmental public interest litigation can bring its value into full play, in order to promote the harmonious development of man and nature. The construction of two-type society and the construction of ecological civilization to provide a solid legal guarantee.
【作者單位】： 湖南商務職業(yè)技術(shù)學院;
【基金】：教育部哲學社會科學重大課題攻關(guān)項目(12JZD037)
【分類號】：D925

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 李摯萍;;中國環(huán)境公益訴訟原告主體的優(yōu)劣分析和順序選擇[J];河北法學;2010年01期

2 宋愛軍;;環(huán)境公益訴訟原告的立法缺陷與完善[J];內(nèi)蒙古環(huán)境科學;2008年03期

3 江偉;略論檢察監(jiān)督權(quán)在民事訴訟中的行使[J];人民檢察;2005年18期

4 張鋒;;環(huán)境公益訴訟原告資格分析[J];政法論叢;2010年03期

5 朱謙;論環(huán)境權(quán)的法律屬性[J];中國法學;2001年03期

【共引文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張，

本文編號：2090656