本文選題：精神病 + 司法鑒定��； 參考：《煙臺(tái)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑事司法精神病鑒定對(duì)刑事案件判決結(jié)果的影響是重大的,尤其在故意殺人、搶劫等最高刑期為死刑的案件中,甚至直接決定著被鑒定人的生與死。近年來(lái),疑似精神病作案的案例仍屢見(jiàn)不鮮,此類(lèi)“疑似精神病患者”的犯罪案件廣受關(guān)注,不斷引發(fā)社會(huì)熱議。鑒于此,依法不負(fù)刑事責(zé)任的精神病人的強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療程序第一次被寫(xiě)入刑事訴訟法,并于2013年實(shí)施。這一制度雖然健全完善了精神病人犯罪的后續(xù)處置程序,但不容否定的是,我國(guó)刑事司法精神病鑒定制度仍然有諸多不足之處。除引言外,本文共分三個(gè)部分:第一部分從刑事司法精神病鑒定制度入手,對(duì)刑事司法精神病鑒定的概念及特征、確立的理論基礎(chǔ)等基本知識(shí)進(jìn)行了闡述,為下文的論述奠定基礎(chǔ)。第二部分,采用正反對(duì)比的方法,先從正面對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑事司法精神病鑒定制度及其積極意義進(jìn)行了闡述,后從反面指出了我國(guó)刑事司法精神病鑒定制度在精神病鑒定決定權(quán)、鑒定管理體制、訴訟參與人訴權(quán)等方面存在的缺陷。第三部分,也是本文的重點(diǎn),通過(guò)分析中外精神病鑒定制度,從加強(qiáng)司法機(jī)關(guān)精神病鑒定決定權(quán)的監(jiān)控、健全刑事司法精神病鑒定體制、推動(dòng)刑事司法精神病鑒定訴訟參與人的訴訟化等四大方面提出了完善我國(guó)刑事司法精神病鑒定制度的構(gòu)想,以期對(duì)健全完善我國(guó)刑事司法精神病鑒定制度有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The identification of criminal justice psychosis has a great influence on the result of the criminal case, especially in the case of the supreme sentence of the death penalty, such as intentional homicide, robbery and so on. In recent years, the cases of suspected psychotic cases are still common, and the criminal cases of "suspected psychotic patients" are widely accepted. In view of this, the compulsory medical procedures for mental patients who are not responsible for criminal responsibility are first written into the criminal procedure law and implemented in 2013. Although the system has perfected the follow-up procedure of the mental patients' crime, it can not be denied that the system of forensic psychiatry identification is still in our country. In addition to the introduction, this article is divided into three parts: the first part, starting with the identification system of criminal justice psychosis, expounds the basic knowledge of the concept and characteristics of the identification of criminal justice psychosis and the theoretical basis of the establishment of the theory, and lays the foundation for the discussion below. The second part, using the positive and negative contrast method, first comes from the front. This paper expounds the current criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system and its positive significance, and then points out the defects in the identification system of mental illness in China's criminal judicial psychiatric identification system in the determination of mental illness, the system of identification and management, and the right of litigious litigation. The third part is also the focus of this article, through the analysis of Chinese and foreign psychosis. The appraisal system, from four aspects, such as strengthening the supervision of the determination of the judicial organ's mental illness, perfecting the system of forensic mental illness identification, and promoting the litigation of the participant in the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal litigation, puts forward the idea of perfecting the system of identification of the mental illness in criminal judicature in our country, with a view to perfecting and perfecting the mental illness of our criminal judicature. It is beneficial to set the system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺(tái)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉道前;;我國(guó)鑒定人資格授予的反思與建議[J];人民論壇;2017年04期

2 賀小軍;;精神病鑒定的悖論及其破解[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2016年01期

3 劉曉慶;;立足司法實(shí)踐試論我國(guó)刑事被害人救助問(wèn)題[J];法制與社會(huì);2015年21期

4 李菊萍;韓衛(wèi);顧珊智;陳騰;;論法醫(yī)臨床鑒定中被鑒定人的知情同意權(quán)[J];法醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2015年01期

5 田毅平;;新刑事訴訟法鑒定制度不足與再完善[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年07期

6 劉哲;;刑事二審程序問(wèn)題研究——兼評(píng)《刑事訴訟法》修改相關(guān)內(nèi)容[J];法律適用;2012年07期

7 王敏遠(yuǎn);;論我國(guó)刑事證據(jù)法的轉(zhuǎn)變[J];法學(xué)家;2012年03期

8 張青;;刑事訴訟中司法鑒定質(zhì)證程序完善構(gòu)想[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年02期

9 陳心歌;;論刑事司法鑒定制度的基本原則——以刑事訴訟法的修改為視角[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2011年05期

10 張愛(ài)艷;;“精神病”與刑事責(zé)任能力的判斷[J];政法論叢;2011年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 吳彩玲;論我國(guó)精神病人強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療程序的立法完善[D];廣東商學(xué)院;2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2080500