本文選題：環(huán)境污染 + 侵權(quán)　； 參考：《蘇州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著現(xiàn)代工業(yè)的快速發(fā)展，環(huán)境污染損害糾紛日益增多。環(huán)境污染的特征決定了污染與損害間的因果關(guān)系很難認(rèn)定。按照傳統(tǒng)侵權(quán)理論并不利于保護(hù)受害人合法權(quán)益，，于是因果關(guān)系推定理論應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。當(dāng)前各國紛紛建立起因果關(guān)系推定原則，成為環(huán)境污染侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系的主要認(rèn)定方法。我國亦逐漸在立法中改變傳統(tǒng)做法，建立了舉證責(zé)任倒置原則。但很多學(xué)者質(zhì)疑舉證責(zé)任倒置與因果關(guān)系推定并非同一概念，即使在我國舉證責(zé)任倒置的制度體系下，環(huán)境污染侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定也存在很多問題，包括立法過于單一化、原則化；混淆了舉證責(zé)任倒置與因果關(guān)系推定的區(qū)別；誤解了舉證責(zé)任倒置的內(nèi)涵；因果關(guān)系推定的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)混亂等。針對(duì)以上問題，一是要在正確區(qū)分因果關(guān)系推定和舉證責(zé)任倒置是兩個(gè)不同概念的前提下，在環(huán)境污染侵權(quán)民事訴訟中引入因果關(guān)系推定原則。二是同時(shí)要盡快完善立法，科學(xué)分配舉證責(zé)任。只有這樣，才能為環(huán)境污染侵權(quán)受害者提供更有利于的保護(hù)，充分實(shí)現(xiàn)司法公正。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of modern industry, environmental pollution damage disputes are increasing. The characteristics of environmental pollution determine the cause and effect relationship between pollution and damage is difficult to identify. According to the traditional tort theory, it is not conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the victims, so the theory of causation presumption should be born. The principle is the main method of determining the causation of environmental pollution tort. China has also gradually changed the traditional practice in the legislation and established the principle of inversion of the burden of proof. However, many scholars doubt that the inversion of the burden of proof and the presumption of causality are not the same concept, even under the system of the inversion of the burden of proof in our country, the cause of environmental pollution is caused by the infringement. There are also many problems in the determination of the relationship between fruit and fruit, including the simplification and principle of the legislation, the confusion of the difference between the inversion of the burden of proof and the presumption of causality, the misunderstanding of the connotation of the inversion of the burden of proof, the standard confusion of the presumption of causation, and so on. On the premise of two different concepts, the principle of causation is introduced in the tort civil action of environmental pollution. The two is to improve the legislation as soon as possible and distribute the burden of proof scientifically. Only in this way can we provide more favorable protection for the victims of environmental pollution tort and fully realize judicial justice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923;D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 馬栩生;;因果關(guān)系推定研究——以環(huán)境侵權(quán)為視角[J];環(huán)境資源法論叢;2005年00期

2 王社坤;;環(huán)境侵權(quán)訴訟中的因果關(guān)系與舉證責(zé)任[J];環(huán)境經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年08期

3 鄒雄;對(duì)民事訴訟舉證責(zé)任若干問題的思考[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

4 張玉敏;李益松;;侵權(quán)法上因果關(guān)系理論的反思[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2005年06期

5 呂忠梅;環(huán)境侵權(quán)訴訟證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)初探[J];政法論壇;2003年05期

6 李勁;;環(huán)境侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任因果關(guān)系新探[J];政治與法律;2006年02期

本文編號(hào)：2069718