本文選題：檢察機(jī)關(guān) + 職務(wù)犯罪��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：新刑事訴訟法明確檢察機(jī)關(guān)在查辦職務(wù)犯罪案件可以采取技術(shù)偵查措施,從立法上正式確立了檢察機(jī)關(guān)技術(shù)偵查措施的合法性,有利于實現(xiàn)打擊職務(wù)犯罪和保障公民人權(quán)的高度平衡,也有利于偵查機(jī)關(guān)拓展偵查手段,提高辦案水平和案件質(zhì)量,實現(xiàn)偵查模式“由供到證”向“由證到供、供證互動”的轉(zhuǎn)變。但該制度在立法上僅是原則性規(guī)定,欠缺操作規(guī)范細(xì)則,需要進(jìn)一步細(xì)化和明確。本文首先簡單討論技術(shù)偵查措施基礎(chǔ)理論,然后詳細(xì)討論新刑訴法關(guān)于技術(shù)偵查措施的相關(guān)規(guī)定,接著探討在目前理論上和司法實踐中技術(shù)偵查措施仍然存在的缺失與困惑,提出相應(yīng)的立法建議,期望技術(shù)偵查措施立法規(guī)定更加完備,在查辦職務(wù)犯罪案件中能夠發(fā)揮更大的作用。全文共分為四部分論述:第一部分:技術(shù)偵查措施的基礎(chǔ)理論。詳細(xì)介紹了技術(shù)偵查措施的概念和類別,介紹了技術(shù)偵查措施的呈現(xiàn)的特征,需要把握的使用原則,及其重要意義等內(nèi)容。第二部分:分析介紹技術(shù)偵查措施在我國的制度框架。重點(diǎn)介紹新《刑事訴訟法》中關(guān)于技術(shù)偵查措施的規(guī)定,同時對《聯(lián)合國反腐敗公約》等國際公約對技術(shù)偵查措施的相關(guān)介紹。第三部分:分析新《刑訴法》關(guān)于技術(shù)偵查措施規(guī)定的遺憾和缺失,闡述新《刑訴法》中缺乏對技術(shù)偵查措施概念和種類的規(guī)定,缺乏批準(zhǔn)機(jī)關(guān)和批準(zhǔn)程序的規(guī)定,缺乏相應(yīng)的監(jiān)督制約、權(quán)利救濟(jì)機(jī)制,以及應(yīng)用技偵措施種類單一,目的局限等缺失和不足。第四部分:針對第三部分提出的缺失和困惑,有針對性地提出對應(yīng)的完善建議,包括:明確技術(shù)偵查措施的概念和種類,加強(qiáng)檢察公安協(xié)同配合,明確批準(zhǔn)機(jī)關(guān)和程序,考慮賦予檢察機(jī)關(guān)技偵實施權(quán),加強(qiáng)對技術(shù)偵查的監(jiān)督和制約,建立健全侵權(quán)救濟(jì)機(jī)制,拓展應(yīng)用種類等內(nèi)容。
[Abstract]:The new criminal procedure law makes it clear that the procuratorial organs can take technical investigation measures in investigating and handling job-related crimes, thus formally establishing the legality of the technical investigation measures of the procuratorial organs in legislation. It is beneficial to achieve a high balance between cracking down on job-related crimes and safeguarding citizens' human rights, and also conducive to the investigation organs to expand investigative techniques, improve the level and quality of handling cases, and realize the pattern of investigation from "from supply to evidence" to "from evidence to evidence". The change of evidence interaction. However, the system is only a rule of principle in legislation, and needs further refinement and clarification. This paper briefly discusses the basic theory of technical investigation measures, then discusses in detail the relevant provisions of the new criminal procedure law on technical investigation measures, and then discusses the deficiencies and puzzles that still exist in the technical investigation measures in theory and judicial practice at present. It is expected that the legislative provisions of technical investigation measures will be more complete and can play a greater role in the investigation and handling of job-related crimes. The full text is divided into four parts: the first part: the basic theory of technical investigation measures. This paper introduces the concept and category of technical investigation measures, the features of technical investigation measures, the principles to be grasped, and its significance. The second part: introduce the system frame of technical investigation measure in our country. This paper mainly introduces the provisions on technical investigation measures in the new Criminal procedure Law, and also introduces the technical investigation measures in international conventions such as the United Nations Convention against Corruption. The third part analyzes the regret and deficiency of the technical investigation measures in the new Criminal procedure Law, and expounds that the new Criminal procedure Law lacks the definition and type of technical investigation measures, the approval authority and the approval procedure. Lack of corresponding supervision and restriction, right relief mechanism, single type of application of technical detection measures, limitation of purpose and so on. The fourth part: aiming at the defects and puzzles put forward in the third part, the author puts forward the corresponding perfect suggestions, including: defining the concept and types of technical investigation measures, strengthening the coordination of procuratorial and public security, clarifying the approval organs and procedures, It is considered that the procuratorial organs should be given the power to carry out the technical investigation, strengthen the supervision and restriction of the technical investigation, establish and perfect the relief mechanism of infringement, and expand the categories of application, etc.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 寧建新;李華偉;;職務(wù)犯罪案件應(yīng)允許采用技術(shù)偵查措施[J];人民檢察;2007年06期

2 陳植;;淺談我國職務(wù)犯罪技術(shù)偵查措施的構(gòu)建[J];法制與社會;2012年18期

3 李慧英;徐志濤;;論我國技術(shù)偵查措施的法定化[J];中國刑事法雜志;2012年07期

4 甄貞;張慧明;;試論職務(wù)犯罪技術(shù)偵查措施的批準(zhǔn)與執(zhí)行[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年03期

5 畢文麗;;淺議技術(shù)偵查措施實施的必要性及審批程序的構(gòu)建[J];法制與社會;2013年07期

6 程佳;李銳;;技術(shù)偵查措施概念辨析[J];法制與社會;2013年18期

7 伏兆倩;;論技術(shù)偵查措施的法定化[J];法制與社會;2013年21期

8 孫長祥;;淺論風(fēng)險社會中的犯罪與技術(shù)偵查措施[J];法制與社會;2013年25期

9 吳真文;黃輝軍;;完善我國技術(shù)偵查措施的立法思考[J];湖南社會科學(xué);2014年02期

10 許志;;技術(shù)偵查措施的法律規(guī)制[J];社會科學(xué)家;2007年05期

相關(guān)會議論文 前6條

1 俞波濤;;職務(wù)犯罪案件技術(shù)偵查措施的運(yùn)用與規(guī)制研究[A];第八屆國家高級檢察官論壇論文集：偵查程序的修改與檢察工作應(yīng)對[C];2012年

2 鄧發(fā)強(qiáng);尹暢;;技術(shù)偵查措施在偵辦重大職務(wù)犯罪案件中的應(yīng)用研究[A];第八屆國家高級檢察官論壇論文集：偵查程序的修改與檢察工作應(yīng)對[C];2012年

3 黃福濤;高哲遠(yuǎn);;偵查監(jiān)督視野下技術(shù)偵查措施研究[A];第八屆國家高級檢察官論壇論文集：偵查程序的修改與檢察工作應(yīng)對[C];2012年

4 喬t焧，

本文編號：2067219