發(fā)布時間：2018-06-11 14:07

  本文選題：專利侵權糾紛 + 仲裁��； 參考：《重慶大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：專利侵權糾紛仲裁，是指仲裁機構根據(jù)糾紛雙方達成的仲裁協(xié)議，依法居中對糾紛做出仲裁裁決的行為。由于仲裁具有靈活性、自愿性、專業(yè)性、保密性和高效性的特點，仲裁方式解決專利侵權糾紛已在歐美等發(fā)達國家得到了廣泛應用，但在我國的實踐才剛剛起步且困難重重，，其中影響因素既有理論論證的不足，也有制度設計的癥結(jié)，還有傳統(tǒng)觀念的束縛。本文在介紹專利侵權糾紛的特點及其主要解決方式的基礎之上，對仲裁解決專利侵權糾紛進行優(yōu)勢分析，提出我國專利侵權糾紛仲裁解決的法理依據(jù)，剖析我國當前專利侵權糾紛仲裁的現(xiàn)狀和問題，借鑒WIPO仲裁與調(diào)解中心以及美國、日本、法國等國家的相關制度設計和實踐經(jīng)驗，提出完善我國專利侵權仲裁機制的工作思路、立法建議和具體措施。 本文第二章首先介紹了幾種常見的專利侵權糾紛解決模式，為提出專利侵權糾紛仲裁做好鋪墊；其次，提出本文主題，介紹專利侵權糾紛仲裁的含義，并對其進行優(yōu)勢分析。 第三章針對我國專利侵權糾紛仲裁制度進行考察分析，一方面通過分析我國相關立法，為我國專利侵權糾紛仲裁提供法理依據(jù)，另一方面，介紹我國專利侵權糾紛仲裁現(xiàn)狀，并從立法、機構設置和程序銜接三個方面指出存在的問題。 第四章和第五章介紹了WIPO仲裁與調(diào)解中心以及美國、日本、英國、法國、加拿大等國家有關專利侵權糾紛仲裁的相關立法和實踐，并總結(jié)歸納其對我國專利侵權糾紛仲裁制度的啟示。 第六章為本文的重點章節(jié)，提出在立足于我國的現(xiàn)實和需要的基礎之上，借鑒域外相關制度設計和實踐，提出完善我國專利侵權糾紛仲裁制度的工作思路和具體措施。
[Abstract]:Arbitration of patent infringement dispute refers to the act of arbitration institution in accordance with the arbitration agreement reached by the two parties to the dispute and mediating the arbitration award of the dispute according to law. Due to the characteristics of flexibility, voluntariness, professionalism, confidentiality and efficiency, arbitration has been widely used in developed countries, such as Europe and America, but the practice in our country is just beginning and difficult. The influencing factors are not only the deficiency of theoretical argument, but also the crux of system design, as well as the shackles of traditional ideas. On the basis of introducing the characteristics of patent infringement disputes and their main solutions, this paper analyzes the advantages of arbitration in resolving patent infringement disputes, and puts forward the legal basis for the arbitration settlement of patent infringement disputes in China. This paper analyzes the current situation and problems of patent infringement arbitration in China, draws lessons from the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center and the relevant system design and practical experience of the United States, Japan, France and other countries, and puts forward the working ideas of perfecting the patent infringement arbitration mechanism in China. The second chapter introduces several common modes of patent infringement dispute resolution, which can pave the way for the arbitration of patent infringement dispute. Secondly, it puts forward the theme of this paper, and introduces the meaning of patent infringement dispute arbitration. The third chapter investigates and analyzes the arbitration system of patent infringement disputes in China. On the one hand, it provides the legal basis for the arbitration of patent infringement disputes by analyzing the relevant legislation of our country; on the other hand, it provides a legal basis for the arbitration of patent infringement disputes in China, on the other hand, This paper introduces the status quo of patent infringement arbitration in China, and points out the existing problems from three aspects: legislation, institutional setup and procedure convergence. Chapter four and chapter five introduce WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center and the United States, Japan, Britain, France, the United States of America, Japan, the United Kingdom, France, the United States of America, Japan, Britain, France. The relevant legislation and practice of patent infringement dispute arbitration in Canada and other countries, and summarize its enlightenment to the arbitration system of patent infringement dispute in our country. Based on the reality and need of our country, this paper puts forward the working ideas and concrete measures to perfect the arbitration system of patent infringement dispute in our country based on the design and practice of foreign relevant system.
【學位授予單位】：重慶大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.42;D925.7

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前3條

1 王瑩;試論知識產(chǎn)權有效性爭議的可仲裁性[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權;2003年03期

2 李蓓;;高效解決爭端中心——英國知識產(chǎn)權局仲裁特點簡介[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2008年12期

3 鮑冠藝;;2011年新法國仲裁法[J];仲裁研究;2011年03期

本文編號：2005537