本文選題：專利 + 確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴��； 參考：《廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我國(guó)，專利權(quán)人濫用權(quán)力的情況時(shí)有發(fā)生，權(quán)利人向其競(jìng)爭(zhēng)者發(fā)出警告信，對(duì)他人進(jìn)行侵權(quán)指控并威脅起訴，但在相當(dāng)長(zhǎng)的期間內(nèi)都不向法院起訴，不僅給權(quán)力相對(duì)人造成損失，還給市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)造成不良影響。在知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)的今天，為保證知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)都可以順利地轉(zhuǎn)化為資本，促進(jìn)知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)的良好運(yùn)作，嚴(yán)格規(guī)制專利權(quán)人濫用權(quán)力無(wú)疑是大勢(shì)所趨。專利確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴是最早在我國(guó)實(shí)踐領(lǐng)域出現(xiàn)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴的子訴，具有督促專利權(quán)人積極依法使用專利權(quán)的功能，可惜此類訴訟在理論和實(shí)踐上都存在不少問(wèn)題需要厘清，其法理性質(zhì)、當(dāng)事人資格、受理?xiàng)l件、管轄范圍以及審判等問(wèn)題等等一系列理論和實(shí)踐方面的具體問(wèn)題并未明確。這類案件在法律法規(guī)中還找不到對(duì)應(yīng)的規(guī)定，其受理?xiàng)l件等問(wèn)題的規(guī)定還保留在最高院的司法解釋層次。本文從研究專利確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴的理論入手，再分析我國(guó)專利確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴的實(shí)施情況，并有針對(duì)性的考察域外制度，在結(jié)合我國(guó)實(shí)際情況的基礎(chǔ)上，嘗試借鑒域外制度和實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)，以圖完善我國(guó)的專利確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)制度。本文共分為四部分： 第一章先論述專利確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴的定義與性質(zhì)，然后介紹了此類訴訟的發(fā)展歷程和制度價(jià)值，最后辨析專利確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴與其他相關(guān)訴訟的關(guān)系，突出在專利領(lǐng)域引入確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)訴訟制度的必要性。 第二章對(duì)我國(guó)專利確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行考察，集中分析了我國(guó)專利確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴的受理?xiàng)l件、管轄和審判，同時(shí)提出我國(guó)專利確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴在實(shí)踐中所遇到的困境。 第三章考察了域外的專利確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴制度，并主要探討了英美日德以及我國(guó)澳門臺(tái)灣地區(qū)的專利確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴的受理?xiàng)l件、管轄法院和審判制度，并分析其對(duì)我國(guó)專利確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴的借鑒意義，以圖能為我國(guó)專利確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴的制度完善帶來(lái)參考意義。 第四章主要針對(duì)我國(guó)專利確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴的制度完善進(jìn)行探討，并結(jié)合第二、三章的研究成果，嘗試從專利確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴的受理?xiàng)l件、管轄法院和審判制度等方面提出改善建議。
[Abstract]:In our country , the abuse of power by the patent holder has occurred , and the author has issued a warning letter to his competitors , and has not been charged to the court in a long period of time . It has not only caused the loss to the power but also the market competition . It is a pity that this kind of litigation has many problems in theory and practice . It is a pity that no infringement is made in theory and practice . It is a pity that this kind of litigation has many problems in theory and practice . It is a pity that the patent recognition does not infringe the right of infringement . In the light of the practical situation of our country , the author tries to draw lessons from the extraterritorial system and practical experience to perfect the patent recognition non - infringement system in our country .

The first chapter discusses the definition and nature of the patent recognition non - infringement , then introduces the development course and the system value of such litigation , and finally analyzes the relation between the patent recognition non - infringement and other relevant litigation , and highlights the necessity of confirming the non - infringement litigation system in the patent field .

The second chapter investigates the current situation of patent recognition non - infringement in our country , analyzes the acceptance condition , jurisdiction and trial of the patent recognition non - infringement in our country , and puts forward the dilemma that the patent recognition does not infringe in practice in practice .

The third chapter examines the system of patent recognition non - infringement in China and mainly discusses the admissibility condition , jurisdiction court and trial system of patent recognition non - infringement in China and Japan , and analyzes its reference significance to the patent recognition non - infringement of our country , so as to bring the reference significance for the perfection of the system of patent recognition and non - infringement .

In the fourth chapter , the author probes into the perfection of the system of patent recognition non - infringement in our country , and combines the research results of the second and third chapters , and attempts to improve the suggestions from the aspects of patent recognition , acceptance condition , jurisdiction court and trial system .
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42;D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 江早云;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)案件確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴的法院管轄[J];中華商標(biāo);2005年12期

2 郭瑩;閆文軍;;確認(rèn)不侵犯專利權(quán)之訴的受理?xiàng)l件研究[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

3 孫海龍;姚建軍;;對(duì)確認(rèn)不侵犯專利權(quán)法律問(wèn)題的探討[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2008年02期

4 郭偉;;基于平衡視角論域名確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)案件的受理?xiàng)l件[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年03期

5 周平;;淺析知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)訴訟的受理?xiàng)l件[J];發(fā)明與創(chuàng)新(綜合版);2008年12期

6 陳鈞;;對(duì)確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴有關(guān)問(wèn)題的研究[J];中國(guó)發(fā)明與專利;2010年04期

7 徐輝鴻;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴受理?xiàng)l件探析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年05期

8 趙蕾;;確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴的理論探討及程序細(xì)化——以民事訴訟為視角的分析[J];法治研究;2011年01期

9 熊亮;;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)訴訟的訴的利益[J];甘肅理論學(xué)刊;2011年02期

10 易玲;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)訴訟之法律性質(zhì)探析[J];公民與法(法學(xué));2010年12期

，

本文編號(hào)：2000560