發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-09 14:38

  本文選題：民事訴訟 + 庭外作證�。� 參考：《法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào))》2017年01期

【摘要】：民事訴訟法規(guī)定的庭外作證,其程序功能已經(jīng)異化為降低司法成本為主,弱化了證據(jù)調(diào)查作用,致使庭外證言的正當(dāng)性、可信性嚴(yán)重不足,程序運(yùn)作流于形式。相應(yīng)的制度完善應(yīng)當(dāng)堅(jiān)持證人調(diào)查為中心的轉(zhuǎn)向,將庭外作證的條件、作證方式兩部構(gòu)造模式,充實(shí)為條件、作證方式、調(diào)查措施三部構(gòu)造模式,以使庭外作證程序功能回歸到事實(shí)查明的根本。通過(guò)委托調(diào)查等手段擴(kuò)充證人調(diào)查的司法資源,針對(duì)不同庭外作證方式運(yùn)用直接與間接的證人調(diào)查措施,為庭外作證情況下各項(xiàng)程序價(jià)值的平衡提供有效的制度保障。
[Abstract]:The procedural function of out-of-court testimony stipulated by the Civil procedure Law has been dissimilated to reduce the judicial cost, weakening the evidence investigation function, resulting in the legitimacy and credibility of the testimony out of court, and the procedure operation being a mere formality. The corresponding system perfection should insist on the turning of witness investigation as the center, and make out of court the condition of testifying, the mode of testifying two parts of construction mode, the enrichment of condition, the mode of testifying, and the measure of investigation. In order to make out-of-court testifying procedure function to return to the fact to find out the root. The judicial resources of witness investigation are expanded by means of entrusted investigation, and direct and indirect witness investigation measures are applied to different ways of testifying out of court, which provides an effective system guarantee for the balance of the value of each procedure in the case of out-of-court testimony.
【作者單位】： 上海師范大學(xué)法政學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金一般項(xiàng)目(15BFX068)“民事證人庭外作證體系研究” 教育部人文社科規(guī)劃基金一般項(xiàng)目(14YJA820013)“民事訴訟視聽(tīng)傳輸技術(shù)作證研究”
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;紀(jì)念《民事訴訟法》頒行十周年學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)在京召開(kāi)[J];中國(guó)律師;2001年05期

2 蔡彥敏;張s，

本文編號(hào)：2000069