本文選題：中級(jí)人民法院 + 巡回行政法庭　； 參考：《廣西民族大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：行政訴訟目的是解決行政爭(zhēng)議,從而保護(hù)行政相對(duì)人的合法權(quán)益,監(jiān)督行政機(jī)關(guān)依法行政,但是由于行政管轄的“原告就被告”原則并不能滿足行政管轄的“兩便原則”,同時(shí)也給地方政府干預(yù)司法提供了便利條件,行政訴訟目的無(wú)法實(shí)現(xiàn),針對(duì)其所帶來(lái)的問(wèn)題,實(shí)踐中也對(duì)行政案件管轄做了一系列的改革,但是其并不能完全排除地方保護(hù),反而會(huì)帶來(lái)新的問(wèn)題。文章以中級(jí)法院設(shè)置巡回行政法庭的基本理論出發(fā)。通過(guò)分析現(xiàn)行改革方案中存在的增加原告“訴累”、訴訟成本增多的不足及原因,提出中級(jí)人民法院設(shè)置巡回行政法庭的必要性:即可以實(shí)現(xiàn)提級(jí)管轄又可以方便訴訟,滿足行政案件管轄的內(nèi)在需求;中院設(shè)置巡回行政法庭即有法律依據(jù),在實(shí)踐中也是可行的。同時(shí),對(duì)英國(guó)巡回審判制度進(jìn)行分析,不僅要借鑒依靠群眾、發(fā)動(dòng)群眾,深入調(diào)查案件,把矛盾化解在基層,減輕當(dāng)事人訴累的經(jīng)驗(yàn),更要以順應(yīng)時(shí)代發(fā)展為啟示;具體列出巡回行政法庭的審理標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與審理范圍,建立從人員和財(cái)政再到辦案質(zhì)量的制度保障,保障中級(jí)人民巡回行政法庭獨(dú)立、公正審理行政案件,實(shí)現(xiàn)行政訴訟目的。
[Abstract]:The purpose of administrative litigation is to resolve administrative disputes, thus to protect the legitimate rights and interests of administrative counterpart and to supervise the administration of administrative organs according to law. However, since the principle of "plaintiff on defendant" in administrative jurisdiction cannot satisfy the principle of "two means" in administrative jurisdiction, At the same time, it also provides a convenient condition for the local government to intervene in the judicature, and the purpose of administrative litigation cannot be realized. In view of the problems brought about by it, a series of reforms have been made on the jurisdiction of administrative cases in practice, but it can not completely exclude local protection. On the contrary, it will lead to new problems. The article starts from the basic theory that the intermediate court sets up the circuit administrative court. By analyzing the deficiency and reason of increasing the plaintiff's "litigation tiredness" and increasing the litigation cost in the current reform scheme, this paper puts forward the necessity for the intermediate people's court to set up the circuit administrative court, that is, it can realize the promotion of jurisdiction and facilitate the litigation. The intermediate people's court has the legal basis to set up the circuit administrative court, which is also feasible in practice. At the same time, the analysis of the British circuit trial system should not only draw lessons from the masses, mobilize the masses, deeply investigate the cases, resolve the contradictions at the grass-roots level, reduce the litigants' tiredness, but also take the development of the times as an inspiration. The trial standard and scope of the circuit administrative court are listed in detail, the system guarantee from personnel and finance to the quality of handling cases is established, the independence of the intermediate people's circuit administrative court is guaranteed, the administrative case is tried fairly, and the purpose of administrative litigation is realized.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 錢鶴群;;英國(guó)巡回法庭制度的啟示與借鑒[J];江漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年01期

2 劉海蓉;;我國(guó)建立行政法院體制的觀點(diǎn)質(zhì)疑[J];理論與改革;2015年04期

3 劉貴祥;;巡回法庭改革的理念與實(shí)踐[J];法律適用;2015年07期

4 葛先園;;人民法院跨行政區(qū)域管轄行政案件路徑探索——以新《行政訴訟法》第18條第2款為中心[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年02期

5 陳光中;魏曉娜;;論我國(guó)司法體制的現(xiàn)代化改革[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2015年01期

6 李少平;;全面推進(jìn)依法治國(guó)背景下的司法改革[J];法律適用;2015年01期

7 傅郁林;;最高人民法院巡回法庭的職能定位與權(quán)威形成[J];中國(guó)法律評(píng)論;2014年04期

8 顧培東;;再論人民法院審判權(quán)運(yùn)行機(jī)制的構(gòu)建[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2014年05期

9 郭修江;;行政訴訟集中管轄問(wèn)題研究——《關(guān)于開(kāi)展行政案件相對(duì)集中管轄試點(diǎn)工作的通知》的理解與實(shí)踐[J];法律適用;2014年05期

10 陳衛(wèi)東;;司法機(jī)關(guān)依法獨(dú)立行使職權(quán)研究[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2014年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 韓慧雪;我國(guó)跨行政區(qū)劃法院研究[D];重慶郵電大學(xué);2016年

2 黃捷;行政訴訟地域管轄制度的完善研究[D];廣西民族大學(xué);2014年

3 周嫣;中國(guó)巡回審判史述論[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

4 李留陽(yáng);我國(guó)行政訴訟目的之定位及其實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1929617