本文選題：誠實信用原則 + 民事訴訟法�。� 參考：《華東政法大學》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：2012年民事訴訟法修改,在第十三條第一款增加了誠實信用原則,自此,該原則正式在我國民事訴訟法中確立下來。2015年2月4日起施行的《關于適用中華人民共和國民事訴訟法的解釋》對該原則作出了部分具體規(guī)定,為該原則在司法實踐中的適用提供了指引。該原則的入法當然有助于解決現階段出現的當事人詐訴、濫訴等訴訟不誠信的問題,具有重要的意義,但同時也帶來了一些問題,引人思考。在本文第一章中,筆者首先介紹了誠實信用原則的概念,指出其在民法領域已經形成普遍認可的定義,但是在民事訴訟領域卻尚未形成一致的看法。接下來著重介紹該原則在民事訴訟領域的歷史沿革,敘述其發(fā)展脈絡,更直觀的從源頭上理解該原則。隨后對民事訴訟法確立該原則的原因和過程予以說明,并闡述筆者對民事訴訟法第十三條的理解,揭示該原則入法的重大意義。民事訴訟法這一公法確立了誠實信用原則,可以說是私法向公法擴張的典型代表。在作為私法的民法中,該原則被定位為“帝王條款”,可見其在民法中占據著舉足輕重的地位。而本文第二章正是通過對民法和民事訴訟法中誠實信用原則的對比來體現出兩部部門法中該原則的不同,這些不同都決定了我們看待民法中的誠實信用原則和民事訴訟法中的該原則時,不能等同視之,也不能簡單的將民事訴訟中的該原則視為民法原則的自然延伸。二者之間的差異還是值得引起我們重視的,這也提醒我們,想要實現該原則在民事訴訟中的正確適用,充分發(fā)揮其在民事訴訟領域的作用,就要另辟蹊徑,作出符合民事訴訟精神的應用解釋。在本文的第三章,筆者首先對民事訴訟法、司法解釋和其他相關規(guī)范中體現誠實信用原則的法律條文作了一個梳理,意圖更全面直觀的從法律條文角度來理解該原則。接下來,筆者對該原則同民事訴訟中的辯論原則、處分原則和證據制度之間的關系提出了自己的看法。該原則與這幾個制度之間既存在著一致的地方,也存在著互相制衡之處。因此,雖然民事訴訟法確立該原則是必要的,但是若想使該原則更好地發(fā)揮其功能和作用,尚須解決該原則確立之后可能引起的體系上的問題。在本文的第四章,筆者著重介紹了誠實信用原則對當事人、法院和其他訴訟參與人這三個主體內容的要求。通過不同角度的分析,筆者認為現階段將該原則的規(guī)范主體限制為當事人更妥當。接下來通過對實踐中該原則的適用情況予以介紹,揭示目前司法實踐中出現的問題,并針對這些問題,提出了自己的適用建議,以期使得該原則能夠真正擔當起民事訴訟基本原則的重任,而不是被束之高閣,流于形式。
[Abstract]:The Civil procedure Law was amended in 2012 to add the principle of good faith to Article 13, paragraph 1, since then, This principle has been formally established in the Civil procedure Law of our country. The interpretation of the Application of the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China, which came into force on February 4, 2015, has made some specific provisions on this principle. It provides guidance for the application of this principle in judicial practice. The introduction of this principle is of course helpful to solve the problem of dishonesty of litigants such as fraudulent action and excessive action, which is of great significance, but at the same time, it also brings some problems and leads people to think about them. In the first chapter of this paper, the author first introduces the concept of the principle of good faith, pointing out that it has formed a generally accepted definition in the field of civil law, but in the field of civil litigation has not yet formed a consistent view. Then it introduces the history of the principle in the field of civil litigation, narrates its development, and more intuitively understands the principle from the source. Then it explains the reason and process of establishing the principle of civil procedure law, expounds the author's understanding of the thirteenth article of civil procedure law, and reveals the great significance of the principle entering the law. The public law of civil procedure establishes the principle of good faith and can be said to be a typical representative of the expansion of private law into public law. In the civil law as private law, the principle is defined as "imperial clause", which can be seen to occupy a pivotal position in civil law. The second chapter of this paper is through the comparison of the principle of good faith in civil law and civil procedure law to reflect the difference of this principle in the two department laws. These differences determine that when we look at the principle of good faith in civil law and the principle of civil procedure law, we can not equate it, nor can we simply regard the principle in civil litigation as the natural extension of civil law principle. The difference between the two is worthy of our attention, which reminds us that if we want to realize the correct application of this principle in civil litigation and give full play to its role in the field of civil litigation, we must take a different approach. To make an application interpretation consistent with the spirit of civil action. In the third chapter of this paper, the author first of all, the civil procedure law, judicial interpretation and other relevant norms to reflect the principle of good faith in a comb, with the intention of a more comprehensive and intuitive understanding of the principle from the perspective of the legal provisions. Then, the author puts forward his own views on the relationship between the principle and the principle of argument in civil action, the principle of disposition and the system of evidence. There is not only consistency between this principle and these systems, but also checks and balances. Therefore, although it is necessary to establish this principle in civil procedure law, if we want to make it play its function and function better, it is necessary to solve the system problems that may arise after the establishment of the principle. In the fourth chapter, the author emphatically introduces the requirements of the principle of good faith to the parties, courts and other litigant participants. Through the analysis of different angles, the author thinks that it is more appropriate to restrict the normative subject of this principle to the parties. Then, through the introduction of the application of this principle in practice, it reveals the problems in the current judicial practice, and puts forward its own suggestions for the application of these problems. It is hoped that the principle can take on the important task of the basic principles of civil procedure, instead of being shelved and become a mere formality.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D925.1

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 ;紀念《民事訴訟法》頒行十周年學術研討會在京召開[J];中國律師;2001年05期

2 蔡彥敏;張s，

本文編號：1924467