本文選題：規(guī)章以下規(guī)范性文件　切入點(diǎn)：合法性　出處：《遼寧大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我國,規(guī)章以下的規(guī)范性文件是指國務(wù)院各部委、地方政府及其主管部門以及享有法定授權(quán)的行政組織為執(zhí)行法律、法規(guī)和規(guī)章頒布實(shí)施的效力在規(guī)章以下的具有普遍約束力的決定、命令。這些規(guī)章以下的規(guī)范性文件往往是行政機(jī)關(guān)作出行政行為最直接的、具有具體可操作性的依據(jù),它填補(bǔ)了法律空白,滿足了實(shí)際生活中行政管理的需要,使法律原則和規(guī)范更加具體化和具有可操作性。但是由于規(guī)章以下規(guī)范性文件并不像法律、法規(guī)和規(guī)章那樣屬于“法”的范疇,對其并沒有配套的行之有效的規(guī)范進(jìn)行制約,現(xiàn)有的審查監(jiān)督方式往往只注重形式而不在乎結(jié)果,導(dǎo)致不合法的規(guī)范性文件時(shí)而出現(xiàn)在行政機(jī)關(guān)的管理活動(dòng)中危害人民群眾的合法利益。依據(jù)不合法的行政規(guī)范性文件作出的具體行政行為對公眾的合法利益的損害不僅影響了黨和政府在人民心中的形象,更加阻礙了我國社會(huì)主義法治建設(shè)�，F(xiàn)行的對行政規(guī)范性文件監(jiān)督審查方式的不足也是導(dǎo)致我國必須盡快完善司法審查制度的重要原因。所謂權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)的監(jiān)督審查主要是指全國人大及其常委會(huì)、地方各級人大及其常委會(huì)對行政規(guī)范性文件進(jìn)行備案審查,對違反憲法和法律規(guī)定的行政規(guī)范性文件有權(quán)予以撤銷。行政機(jī)關(guān)內(nèi)部對規(guī)范性文件的監(jiān)督審查包括上級行政機(jī)關(guān)對下級行政機(jī)關(guān)制定的具有普遍約束力的決定、命令等進(jìn)行備案、清理和行政復(fù)議審查。不管是權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)監(jiān)督審查還是行政機(jī)關(guān)內(nèi)部的監(jiān)督審查都存在著不足之處,在實(shí)踐中起不到有效的監(jiān)督制約作用,不利于保護(hù)公民的合法利益。因此,將規(guī)章以下規(guī)范性文件合法性納入司法機(jī)關(guān)的審查監(jiān)督之下尤為必要,司法具有公平公正公開的優(yōu)點(diǎn),由司法機(jī)關(guān)對行政規(guī)范性文件的審查更容易被行政相對人所認(rèn)可。新修訂的《行政訴訟法》第53條、第64條正式確立司法機(jī)關(guān)對規(guī)范性文件審查制度的框架,但新制度必定存在不足之處,例如:審查形式的附帶性、審查范圍的有限性、審查效力的謙抑性以及審查程序缺乏具體可操作性。行政規(guī)范性文件的審查真正進(jìn)入法院司法實(shí)務(wù)操作還需要學(xué)者們、司法工作者們進(jìn)行更多探究。本文在研究我國司法審查制度現(xiàn)狀及其問題的基礎(chǔ)上,參考借鑒了國外先進(jìn)的規(guī)范性文件司法審查制度,對我國司法審查制度構(gòu)建提出了一些具體的操作建議,包括司法審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、原被告資格、法院管轄、審查方式和法院審查效力等。法院審查實(shí)務(wù)工作的開展離不開這些具體的程序規(guī)定,這也是司法審查制度題中應(yīng)有之義。
[Abstract]:In our country, the normative documents under the regulations refer to the various ministries and commissions of the State Council, the local governments and their competent departments, as well as the administrative organizations with statutory authorization for the implementation of the law. A generally binding decision, order, or order that is subject to the rules and regulations. The normative documents below these regulations are often the most direct and practical basis for the administrative agency to make an administrative act. It fills the legal gap, meets the needs of the administration in real life, and makes the legal principles and norms more concrete and operable. But because the normative documents below the regulations are not like the law, The rules and regulations, which belong to the scope of the Law, do not have a complete set of effective norms, and the existing methods of examination and supervision tend to focus only on the form and not on the results. Illegal normative documents sometimes appear in the administrative activities of administrative organs to endanger the legitimate interests of the masses. The damage to the legitimate interests of the public caused by specific administrative acts made according to illegal administrative normative documents. Harm not only affected the image of the Party and the government in the hearts of the people, The deficiency of the current supervision and examination mode of administrative normative documents is also the important reason why our country must improve the judicial review system as soon as possible. The investigation mainly refers to the NPC and its standing Committee, The local people's congresses at various levels and their standing committees shall conduct a record examination of administrative normative documents, Administrative normative documents in violation of the Constitution and laws shall have the right to be revoked. The internal supervision and examination of normative documents by administrative organs includes generally binding decisions made by administrative organs at higher levels on administrative organs at lower levels, Whether it is the supervisory review of power organs or the internal supervision and examination of administrative organs, there are deficiencies, and they do not play an effective supervisory and restrictive role in practice. Therefore, it is particularly necessary to bring the legality of the following normative documents under the scrutiny and supervision of the judiciary, which has the advantages of fairness, fairness and openness. The examination of administrative normative documents by judicial organs is easier to be recognized by administrative counterparts. Article 53 of the newly revised Administrative procedure Law and Article 64 of the newly revised Administrative procedure Law formally establish the framework of the judicial review system for normative documents. However, there must be shortcomings in the new system, such as the incidental nature of the form of review, the limitation of the scope of review, The modesty of the effectiveness of the examination and the lack of concrete maneuverability of the examination procedure. The examination of the administrative normative documents really entering the judicial practice of the court still needs scholars, On the basis of studying the current situation and problems of the judicial review system in China, this paper draws on the advanced judicial review system of normative documents from abroad. Some concrete suggestions on the construction of judicial review system in China are put forward, including the standard of judicial review, the qualification of the original defendant, the jurisdiction of the court, The practice of court review cannot be carried out without these specific procedural provisions, which is also the proper meaning of the judicial review system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱芒;;規(guī)范性文件的合法性要件——首例附帶性司法審查判決書評析[J];法學(xué);2016年11期

2 麻云程;;淺議行政規(guī)范性文件的合法性審查[J];山西青年職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期

3 余軍;張文;;行政規(guī)范性文件司法審查權(quán)的實(shí)效性考察[J];法學(xué)研究;2016年02期

4 王莉;;行政規(guī)范性文件司法審查的突破與局限[J];法制博覽;2016年03期

5 朱淼;;論對規(guī)范性文件的司法審查——以新行政訴訟法的修改為視角[J];南海學(xué)刊;2015年04期

6 王紅衛(wèi);廖希飛;;行政訴訟中規(guī)范性文件附帶審查制度研究[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2015年06期

7 楊士林;;試論行政訴訟中規(guī)范性文件合法性審查的限度[J];法學(xué)論壇;2015年05期

8 易衛(wèi)兵;;行政規(guī)范性文件審查制度分析——以新《行政訴訟法》第五十三條為視角[J];法制博覽;2015年19期

9 程琥;;新《行政訴訟法》中規(guī)范性文件附帶審查制度研究[J];法律適用;2015年07期

10 張浪;;行政規(guī)范性文件的司法審查問題研究——基于《行政訴訟法》修訂的有關(guān)思考[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張浪;行政規(guī)定的合法性研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 尹曉燕;構(gòu)建我國抽象行政行為司法審查制度[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1694316