本文選題：政府信息公開　切入點(diǎn)：行政訴訟　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的持續(xù)發(fā)展,人類已經(jīng)進(jìn)入信息化時(shí)代,信息與信息技術(shù)的革命席卷全球,信息在經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展方面擔(dān)當(dāng)著日益重要的角色。政府信息從具體內(nèi)容上講包括房屋拆遷、公務(wù)員招考、行政處罰、行政區(qū)劃、食品、藥品等信息,這些都關(guān)乎著公民、個(gè)人、組織乃至國(guó)家的利益。從法律層面上講,知情權(quán)亦是法律賦予主體的正當(dāng)權(quán)利,政府進(jìn)行信息公開無疑是保障社會(huì)主體各項(xiàng)合法權(quán)益的有效途徑,最大限度地實(shí)現(xiàn)人民當(dāng)家作主的政治地位。于此同時(shí),政府信息公開制度給社會(huì)監(jiān)督政府工作提供了良好的平臺(tái),在一定程度上,可以視為促使行政機(jī)關(guān)依法行政的倒逼機(jī)制。為此,有效發(fā)揮政府信息公開制度的作用對(duì)建設(shè)“陽(yáng)光型政府”至關(guān)重要,順應(yīng)了構(gòu)建社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)的時(shí)代潮流。 《政府信息公開條例》、《公務(wù)員法》、《國(guó)務(wù)院全面推進(jìn)依法行政實(shí)施綱要》、《行政處罰法》的出臺(tái),政府信息公開制度得以初步確立,這在民主政治建設(shè)史上邁出了重要的一步。然而,在司法實(shí)務(wù)當(dāng)中,公民的知情權(quán)沒有得到切實(shí)有效地保障,信息公開制度不能實(shí)現(xiàn)法律效果和社會(huì)效果的統(tǒng)一,動(dòng)搖著司法權(quán)威。由于我國(guó)的政府信息公開制度的起步較晚,進(jìn)入訴訟程序后,面臨當(dāng)事人資格、審理判決、受案范圍、適用程序等問題。本文先從政府信息公開制度的一般理論入手,從整體上對(duì)政府信息公開訴訟進(jìn)行了解,在此過程中,對(duì)政府信息及其例外范圍進(jìn)行界定則是探究政府信息公開訴訟制度的關(guān)鍵�！稐l例》對(duì)國(guó)家秘密、商業(yè)秘密、個(gè)人隱私的信息作出了保護(hù)性的規(guī)定,但在實(shí)踐當(dāng)中,也要遵循行政訴訟法公認(rèn)的比例原則,即在個(gè)人利益與公共利益間進(jìn)行考量,并不是一味的保護(hù)個(gè)人利益。并且,通過對(duì)我國(guó)信息公開制度存在的具體問題進(jìn)行梳理,對(duì)域外諸如英國(guó)、美國(guó)、日本等典型性國(guó)家的制度進(jìn)行比較分析,盡己微薄之力,對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的政府信息公開訴訟制度提出幾點(diǎn)完善意見。
[Abstract]:With the sustainable development of socialist market economy, mankind has entered the information age, and the revolution of information and information technology has swept the world. Information plays an increasingly important role in economic and social development. Government information, in terms of specific contents, includes information on house demolition, civil servant recruitment, administrative punishment, administrative divisions, food, medicine, etc., all of which are related to citizens and individuals. From the legal level, the right to know is also the legitimate right given by the law to the subject. It is undoubtedly an effective way to protect the legal rights and interests of the social subject that the government makes the information public. At the same time, the open system of government information provides a good platform for social supervision of government work, to a certain extent, Therefore, giving full play to the function of government information disclosure system is very important to the construction of "sunshine government" and conforms to the trend of constructing socialist harmonious society. With the promulgation of the regulations on the publicity of Government Information, the Law on Civil servants, the outline of the State Council for comprehensively promoting the implementation of Administration according to Law, and the Law on Administrative punishment, the system of publicity of government information has been preliminarily established. This is an important step in the history of the construction of democratic politics. However, in judicial practice, the citizens' right to know has not been effectively protected, and the system of information disclosure cannot achieve the unification of legal and social effects. Vacillating the judicial authority. Because of the late start of the public system of government information in our country, after entering the legal proceedings, we are faced with the qualification of the parties, the adjudication, and the scope of the cases. This article starts with the general theory of the government information disclosure system, and makes a general understanding of the government information disclosure litigation. In this process, The definition of government information and its exceptional scope is the key to explore the litigation system of government information disclosure. The regulations provide protective provisions for state secrets, trade secrets, and personal privacy, but in practice, It is also necessary to follow the universally recognized principle of proportionality in administrative procedure law, that is, to consider between personal interests and public interests, instead of blindly protecting personal interests. Moreover, by sorting out the specific problems existing in the information disclosure system in our country, This paper makes a comparative analysis of the systems of foreign countries such as Britain, the United States, Japan and so on, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the existing litigation system of government information disclosure in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1;D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 山文岑;;試論我國(guó)《政府信息公開條例》的缺陷及其完善[J];圖書與情報(bào);2010年01期

2 林鴻潮;許蓮麗;;論政府信息公開訴訟中的證明責(zé)任[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2009年01期

3 何海波;;困頓的行政訴訟[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

4 張紅菊;;英國(guó)信息公開制度及其特點(diǎn)[J];中國(guó)監(jiān)察;2009年02期

5 董妍;;政府信息公開訴訟雙重訴訟利益解析[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

6 王立泉,王寶治,陳開泰;關(guān)于行政訴訟適格被告定義及范圍[J];理論學(xué)習(xí)與研究;1999年06期

7 李廣宇;;政府信息公開訴訟的受案范圍與當(dāng)事人[J];人民司法;2010年05期

8 陳明湖;;論政府信息公開行政訴訟中的證明責(zé)任[J];上饒師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

9 李俊;論行政訴訟簡(jiǎn)易程序的建立[J];天府新論;2004年S1期

10 許蓮麗;;政府信息公開訴訟中的秘密審查制度:美國(guó)的實(shí)踐[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2011年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1655794