本文關(guān)鍵詞： 民事訴訟爭議焦點整理 審理前的準(zhǔn)備階段 民事庭前會議 民事證據(jù)交換 民事證據(jù)失權(quán)　出處：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在不斷地改革與探索中,民事訴訟爭議焦點整理制度作為民事訴訟審前程序的核心,已經(jīng)受到許多國家和地區(qū)的廣泛重視。得益于完善的民事訴訟爭議焦點整理制度,德國、法國等大陸法系國家和英國、美國等英美法系國家甚至日本的民事審前程序之完備程度已經(jīng)躋身世界前列。然而,緣于歷史、社會、法律文化等的差異,我國民事訴訟法在立法上缺乏步驟性與細(xì)致性的規(guī)定；在司法實踐中,審前程序也缺乏切實的準(zhǔn)備工作,法官沒有召集當(dāng)事人在審理前固定民事訴訟爭議焦點的習(xí)慣,總是把對民事訴訟爭議焦點的整理工作視為證據(jù)交換的附庸。直到2015年2月4日《最高人民法院關(guān)于適用(中華人民共和國民事訴訟法的解釋》的施行,才體現(xiàn)出民事訴訟中爭議焦點整理的重要性。本文從民事訴訟爭議焦點整理的概念入手,與域外的民事訴訟爭議焦點整理進(jìn)行比較研究,在對我國民事訴訟爭議焦點整理的立法和司法現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行剖析的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合民事訴訟法的修訂和2015年《最高人民法院關(guān)于適用中華人民共和國民事訴訟法的解釋》的最新規(guī)定,提出了進(jìn)一步完善我國民事訴訟爭議焦點整理的建議,以期對民事訴訟程序立法的進(jìn)一步完善有所裨益。
[Abstract]:In the process of continuous reform and exploration, as the core of the civil litigation pretrial procedure, the civil litigation dispute focus arrangement system has been paid extensive attention by many countries and regions, thanks to the perfect civil litigation dispute focus arrangement system, Germany, Germany, Germany, Germany, Germany, Germany, Germany, Germany. The degree of completeness of civil pretrial procedures in countries with civil law systems such as France and the United Kingdom, the United States and even Japan has been among the highest in the world. However, due to differences in history, society, and legal culture, China's civil procedure law lacks the provisions of step and detail in legislation, and in judicial practice, the pretrial procedure also lacks practical preparation work, and the judge does not summon the parties to fix the focus of civil litigation disputes before the trial. The collation of the focal points of civil litigation is always regarded as an attachment to the exchange of evidence. Until February 4th 2015, the Supreme people's Court on the Application of the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China (the interpretation of the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China), This article starts with the concept of civil litigation dispute focus arrangement, and carries on the comparative research with the foreign civil litigation dispute focus arrangement. On the basis of an analysis of the legislative and judicial status quo of the focus of civil litigation disputes in China, combined with the revision of the Civil procedure Law and the latest provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China in 2015, The author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the focus of civil litigation in order to improve the legislation of civil procedure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 王利明;民事證據(jù)規(guī)則司法解釋若干問題研究[J];法學(xué);2004年01期

2 宋春雨;;新《民事訴訟法》中有關(guān)證據(jù)制度理解和適用的幾個問題[J];法律適用;2013年10期

3 黃俊;;論民事訴訟證據(jù)失權(quán)[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年12期

4 張自合;;論已決事實的預(yù)決效力——以臺灣地區(qū)爭點效的要件為借鑒[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年05期

5 趙澤君;;民事爭點整理程序的合理性基礎(chǔ)及其建構(gòu)[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2008年02期

6 劉萬洪;;民事審理的集中化研究——以庭審程序為中心[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2011年04期

7 趙旭東;;民事訴訟第一審的功能審視與價值體現(xiàn)[J];中國法學(xué);2011年03期

8 李浩;;民事證據(jù)制度的再修訂[J];中外法學(xué);2013年01期

9 楊亞南;;民事訴訟證據(jù)失權(quán)制度芻探[J];現(xiàn)代婦女(下旬);2014年07期

，

本文編號：1536708