本文關(guān)鍵詞： 量刑程序 弊端 改革 漸進(jìn)之路　出處：《法學(xué)雜志》2013年11期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)《刑事訴訟法》第193條規(guī)定了量刑程序,使量刑有了基本法律依據(jù),但對(duì)于死刑案件,卻遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不能滿足量刑公平公正需求,引發(fā)了諸多弊端,導(dǎo)致法官量刑隨意,甚或司法腐敗,影響了司法公信力。其成因極為復(fù)雜,有理念與需求矛盾,也有制度與執(zhí)行沖突。死刑案件量刑程序改革勢(shì)在必行,在考量現(xiàn)實(shí)需求和改革難易程度的前提下,應(yīng)分步實(shí)施,走適合我國(guó)司法實(shí)際的改革之路。
[Abstract]:Article 193 of our country's Criminal procedure Law stipulates the sentencing procedure, which makes the sentencing have the basic legal basis, but for the death penalty cases, it is far from meeting the demand of sentencing fairness and justice, which leads to a lot of malpractices, which leads to the judge's discretion in sentencing. Even judicial corruption affects judicial credibility. Its causes are extremely complicated, there are contradictions between ideas and needs, and there are also conflicts between system and execution. The reform of sentencing procedures in death penalty cases is imperative. Under the premise of considering the actual needs and the degree of difficulty of reform, Should carry out step by step, take the reform road that suits our country judicial reality.
【作者單位】： 山東政法學(xué)院經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易法學(xué)院;
【基金】：作者主持的山東省社會(huì)科學(xué)規(guī)劃研究項(xiàng)目“判例法律地位與司法公正問題研究”(批準(zhǔn)號(hào):08CFXJ09)的研究成果之一
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 陳衛(wèi)東;李訓(xùn)虎;;分而治之:一種完善死刑案件證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的思路[J];人民檢察;2007年08期

2 程進(jìn)飛;;美國(guó)死刑量刑程序?qū)ξ覈?guó)的啟示[J];鄭州航空工業(yè)管理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 耿春霞;黃U，

本文編號(hào)：1535784