本文關(guān)鍵詞： 惡意訴訟 侵權(quán)行為 侵權(quán)損害賠償 誠實信用 法律規(guī)制　出處：《重慶大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 隨著我國經(jīng)濟的迅速發(fā)展和社會的不斷進步,公民的權(quán)利意識不斷提高,法律的社會功能隨之增強,訴訟作為實現(xiàn)公民權(quán)利最終和最重要的手段也越來越受到人們的關(guān)注和重視。然而,事物皆有兩面。在保障當事人訴權(quán)的同時若不對其權(quán)利的行使予以合理限制,就必然存在權(quán)利濫用的風(fēng)險。一旦濫用成為現(xiàn)實,惡意訴訟便會產(chǎn)生并日益泛濫。不僅嚴重侵害特定法律主體的合法權(quán)益,同時也擾亂正常的訴訟秩序,對司法公正與權(quán)威、訴訟價值構(gòu)成直接沖擊,成為名副其實的社會公害。 本論文旨在研究民事惡意訴訟法律規(guī)制的基本問題,為徹底消除這一社會公害獻計獻策。其主要內(nèi)容由以下幾個部分組成:第一部分研究的是民事惡意訴訟的基本含義,包括民事惡意訴訟的概念、性質(zhì)、特征及其構(gòu)成要件。第二部分描述了我國民事惡意訴訟的現(xiàn)狀及危害,并著重分析其形成原因,以便對癥下藥。第三部分在強調(diào)規(guī)制民事惡意訴訟必要性的基礎(chǔ)上,重點介紹了大陸法系與英美法系主要國家規(guī)制民事惡意訴訟的法律對策,以便為我國構(gòu)建并完善相關(guān)制度提供參考。第四部分結(jié)合我國司法實踐,在借鑒其他國家或地區(qū)法律對策的基礎(chǔ)上,對如何完善我國民事惡意訴訟的法律規(guī)制提出了合理建議。主張從宏觀到微觀、一般到特殊、模糊規(guī)范到確定規(guī)范,多角度、全方位地構(gòu)建具體周密、科學(xué)合理的規(guī)制系統(tǒng)。做到程序法和實體法相配合、民事規(guī)制與刑事規(guī)制相結(jié)合,共同發(fā)揮遏制惡意訴訟的功能。在審查起訴階段,法院可以通過裁定不予受理或駁回起訴將一部分惡意起訴行為過濾下來;審判過程中,法院可以直接駁回其訴訟請求或確認行為無效,也可以通知利害關(guān)系人直接參與訴訟維護自身合法權(quán)益;法院做出否定裁判之后,受害人或公訴機關(guān)還可另行提起訴訟,追究惡意訴訟者的侵權(quán)賠償責(zé)任或其它法律責(zé)任。如果損害程度較輕,法庭可以直接采取罰款、拘留、賠禮道歉等程序性措施予以規(guī)制;如果造成的損失超出了受害人理應(yīng)承擔(dān)的訴訟成本,則受害方可以通過提起侵權(quán)損害賠償之訴,要求對方承擔(dān)民事賠償責(zé)任;如果秩 ?褚飩洗蠡蚯榻諮現(xiàn)匾災(zāi)劣詿シ感譚?則應(yīng)追究相應(yīng)的刑事責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of our economy and social progress, citizens' awareness of rights has been improved, and the social function of the law has been enhanced. Litigation as the ultimate and most important means to realize civil rights has been paid more and more attention. There are two sides in everything. If the litigant's right of action is protected and the exercise of its right is not restricted reasonably, there will be the risk of abuse of the right. Once the abuse becomes a reality. Malicious litigation will come into being and spread day by day. It not only seriously infringes the legal rights and interests of specific legal subjects, but also disturbs the normal litigation order, which has a direct impact on judicial justice and authority, and the value of litigation. Become a social hazard worthy of the name. The purpose of this paper is to study the basic issues of legal regulation of civil malicious litigation. In order to eliminate this social hazard, the main content is composed of the following parts: the first part is the basic meaning of civil malicious litigation, including the concept and nature of civil malicious litigation. The second part describes the current situation and harm of civil malicious litigation in China, and emphatically analyzes the reasons for its formation. The third part emphasizes the necessity of regulating civil malicious litigation, and introduces the legal countermeasures of civil malicious litigation in the main countries of civil law system and common law system. In order to provide a reference for our country to build and improve the relevant system. 4th part combined with our judicial practice in reference to other countries or regions on the basis of legal countermeasures. It puts forward reasonable suggestions on how to perfect the legal regulation of civil malicious litigation in our country. It advocates from macro to micro, from general to special, from fuzzy norms to determinate norms, from many angles to all directions to construct concrete and thorough. Scientific and reasonable regulatory system. To achieve procedural law and substantive law in coordination, civil regulation and criminal regulation combined to play a role in containing malicious litigation. In the review of prosecution stage. The court may filter out a portion of the malicious prosecution by ruling that it is inadmissible or rejecting the complaint; In the course of the trial, the court may directly reject its litigation request or confirm the invalidity of the action, or notify the interested parties to participate directly in the lawsuit to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests; After the court makes a negative decision, the victim or the public prosecution can also bring a separate action to investigate the tort liability or other legal liability of the malicious litigant. If the degree of damage is less serious, the court can directly take a fine. Detention, apology and other procedural measures to regulate; If the damage caused exceeds the litigation cost that the victim should bear, the aggrieved party may demand the other party to bear the civil liability for compensation by filing a lawsuit for tort damages. If the rank? Chu ton wash Li Li the earth on his desk, the plaque is bad, the disaster is bad, and the feeling is that he is in the Tan? The corresponding criminal responsibility should be investigated.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D925.1

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 劉洋;論惡意訴訟的法律規(guī)制[D];河南大學(xué);2011年

2 侯子龍;惡意民事訴訟初探[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

3 明智;專利惡意訴訟問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

4 范哲群;民事惡意訴訟及其法律規(guī)制研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

5 楊莉;論民事惡意訴訟的程序法規(guī)制[D];安徽大學(xué);2013年

6 譚福為;論惡意訴訟的法律規(guī)制[D];遼寧大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1489432