本文關(guān)鍵詞： 刑事訴訟 證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn) 排除合理懷疑　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)在訴訟法以及證據(jù)法中都是相當(dāng)重要的制度，同時(shí)也是一個(gè)理論性和實(shí)踐性都很強(qiáng)的問(wèn)題，可以說(shuō)處于訴訟程序中證據(jù)制度的核心地位。此次刑訴法修改，將“排除合理懷疑”引入我國(guó)證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中來(lái)，體現(xiàn)出立法者借鑒英美法系先進(jìn)制度的開(kāi)放心態(tài)。但“排除合理懷疑”不僅是一個(gè)單純的法律術(shù)語(yǔ)，其引入必將帶來(lái)一系列的問(wèn)題，本文將對(duì)這些問(wèn)題進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)要探討。 文章導(dǎo)言部分以“薄熙來(lái)案”庭審的成功引出關(guān)于證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)修法問(wèn)題的探討，并就目前理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界的研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要介紹，陳述了文章的著眼點(diǎn)、目的意義以及研究方法。 第一章為刑事訴訟法關(guān)于證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的修繕評(píng)析，本章主要對(duì)本次刑事訴訟法對(duì)證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的修繕情況進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)介和評(píng)述，首先對(duì)條文進(jìn)行了對(duì)比，對(duì)字面的直觀變化做出比較；其次對(duì)條文背后所反映的立法進(jìn)步進(jìn)行了深刻剖析，意在闡明其程序進(jìn)步價(jià)值。 第二章如何理解“排除合理懷疑”，本章主要是對(duì)“排除合理懷疑”內(nèi)涵的分析，首先對(duì)英美法系國(guó)家的不同觀點(diǎn)和做法進(jìn)行了介紹，主要是對(duì)西方法制背景下“排除合理懷疑”的發(fā)展沿革和歷史背景的說(shuō)明；其次，將其與我國(guó)法制環(huán)境現(xiàn)狀相對(duì)比，在明確差異的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)我國(guó)引入的“合理懷疑”的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行更準(zhǔn)確地理解。 第三章為我國(guó)排除合理懷疑的適用，本章主要是運(yùn)用了案例分析的實(shí)證研究法，通過(guò)選取涵蓋不同要素的案件，比如什么是“合理懷疑”，心證的不同階段中如何“排除合理懷疑”，通過(guò)層次性地對(duì)“排除合理懷疑”進(jìn)行更為直觀地分析和應(yīng)用，以期對(duì)司法實(shí)踐中法官給予示范。 第四章為基于實(shí)證困境的相關(guān)制度完善，，本章主要是從控訴方、辯護(hù)方、審判人員三方的角度，對(duì)目前所反映出來(lái)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)適用障礙進(jìn)行梳理，并針對(duì)這些障礙提出了一些有助于破除障礙的相關(guān)制度環(huán)境完善，主要從法律制度和法制環(huán)境兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行分析，以期保障引入后的“排除合理懷疑”標(biāo)準(zhǔn)有一個(gè)更良好的發(fā)展土壤。
[Abstract]:The standard of proof is a very important system in both procedural law and evidence law, and it is also a problem of strong theory and practice. It can be said to be in the core position of the evidence system in the litigation procedure. The revision of the Criminal procedure Law will introduce "beyond reasonable doubt" into the standard of proof in our country. It reflects the openness of legislators to learn from the advanced system of Anglo-American legal system, but "beyond reasonable doubt" is not only a simple legal term, but its introduction will inevitably bring about a series of problems. This paper briefly discusses these problems. In the introduction part of the article, the successful trial of Bo Xilai case leads to the discussion on the revision of the standard of proof, and briefly introduces the current research situation of the theoretical and practical circles, and states the starting points of the article. Objective significance and research methods. The first chapter is about the revision of the standard of proof of criminal procedure law. This chapter mainly introduces and comments on the repair of the standard of proof in this criminal procedure law. First of all, the article is compared. To make the comparison to the literal visual change; Secondly, the legislative progress reflected behind the articles is deeply analyzed, with a view to clarifying the value of its procedural progress. The second chapter is about how to understand "eliminating reasonable doubt". This chapter mainly analyzes the connotation of "eliminating reasonable doubt", first of all, it introduces the different views and practices of Anglo-American legal system countries. It mainly explains the development and historical background of "beyond reasonable doubt" under the background of western legal system. Secondly, by comparing it with the present situation of legal environment in China, the connotation of "reasonable doubt" introduced in China is understood more accurately on the basis of clear differences. The third chapter is the application of our country beyond reasonable doubt, this chapter is mainly using the empirical research method of case analysis, through the selection of cases covering different elements, such as what is "reasonable doubt". How to "remove reasonable doubt" in different stages of heart-proof, and analyze and apply it more intuitively through hierarchical analysis and application, in order to give a demonstration to the judge in judicial practice. Chapter 4th is based on the empirical difficulties of the relevant system improvement, this chapter is mainly from the prosecution, the defence, the trial staff from the perspective of tripartite, the current reflected the standard of the application of obstacles to comb. And in view of these obstacles put forward some help to overcome the obstacles of the relevant institutional environment perfect, mainly from the legal system and legal environment two aspects of analysis. In order to ensure the introduction of "beyond reasonable doubt" standard has a better development soil.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 余劍;;“排除合理懷疑”證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)在我國(guó)刑事審判中的運(yùn)用——合理定位及實(shí)踐意義探討[J];東方法學(xué);2008年05期

2 賴早興;;美國(guó)刑事訴訟中的“排除合理懷疑”[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2008年05期

3 楊宇冠;孫軍;;“排除合理懷疑”與我國(guó)刑事訴訟證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的完善[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2011年06期

4 熊秋紅;對(duì)刑事證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的思考——以刑事證明中的可能性和確定性為視角[J];法商研究;2003年01期

5 聶立澤;苑民麗;;主客觀相統(tǒng)一原則與刑事證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的層次性研究[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2011年02期

6 李玉華;;刑事證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的新發(fā)展——評(píng)刑事訴訟法修正案(草案)第52條及相關(guān)規(guī)定[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年01期

7 鐘新文,楊波;在客觀真實(shí)與法律真實(shí)之間——對(duì)刑事判決證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的再思考[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

8 龍宗智;我國(guó)刑事訴訟的證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年06期

9 王恰;;證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的“精準(zhǔn)”理解及證據(jù)的“位階式”審查[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2013年12期

10 王憲峰;吳曉;;搶劫案中證據(jù)“排除合理懷疑”的把握——以左某搶劫案為例[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2013年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 郭志遠(yuǎn);刑事證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1462920