本文關鍵詞： 刑事訴訟 非法口供 規(guī)則　出處：《中南大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：口供在我國刑事證據(jù)體系中占有重要地位,導致冤假錯案的主要原因之一就是非法獲取口供�；诖�,新刑事訴訟法增加非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則,規(guī)制的重點是非法獲取口供。 本文首先從湖南益陽的陳新平殺妻案入手,分析我國的非法口供排除制度運行現(xiàn)狀,指出排除非法口供程序啟動困難；案件審理程序形式化；二審救濟不夠等現(xiàn)狀。再由修法后的司法實踐中遇到的新情況指出監(jiān)視居住的濫用也是今后庭審排除非法口供時,由被告提供證據(jù)面臨的難題。 文章第二部分針對上文分析的現(xiàn)狀,選取非法口供排除規(guī)則發(fā)展相對成熟的美國進行分析,考察了美國非法口供排除制度的理論發(fā)展,排除程序的啟動等內容。文章最后結合我國實際,提出了完善我國非法口供排除規(guī)則的建議。指出需要完善相關法律法規(guī)；最為重要的是要使法官在審判案件時貫徹“疑罪從無”的理念,拋棄原有的有罪思維,用無罪思維來對待被告人,用制度來保障法官敢于啟動排除非法口供程序。只有這樣我們才能在刑事訴訟中更好的保障被告人的人權。
[Abstract]:Confessions play an important role in the criminal evidence system of our country, and one of the main reasons leading to false and false cases is the illegal obtaining of confessions. Based on this, the new criminal procedure law adds the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence. The focus of regulation is to obtain confessions illegally. This article begins with Chen Xinping's wife killing case in Yiyang, Hunan Province, analyzes the current situation of illegal confession exclusion system in our country, and points out that it is difficult to start the procedure of excluding illegal confession. Formalization of trial procedure; From the new situation in judicial practice after the revision of the law, it is pointed out that the abuse of surveillance residence is also a difficult problem for the defendant to provide evidence when the illegal confession is ruled out in the future trial. The second part of the article analyzes the current situation of the above analysis, select the United States, where the rule of illegal confession exclusion is relatively mature, and investigate the theoretical development of the exclusion system of illegal confession in the United States. Finally, the paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the exclusion rules of illegal confession in our country, and points out that it is necessary to perfect the relevant laws and regulations. The most important thing is to make the judge to carry out the concept of "suspect crime from nothing", abandon the original guilty thinking, and treat the accused with the innocent thinking. Only in this way can we better protect the human rights of the accused in criminal proceedings.
【學位授予單位】：中南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 陳虎;;程序性制裁之局限性——以非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則為例的分析[J];當代法學;2010年02期

2 高詠;;程序性辯護的困境——以非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的適用為切入點[J];當代法學;2012年01期

3 陳瑞華;;非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的理論解讀[J];證據(jù)科學;2010年05期

4 陳瑞華;;論瑕疵證據(jù)補正規(guī)則[J];法學家;2012年02期

5 陳光中;鄭曦;;論刑事訴訟中的證據(jù)裁判原則——兼談《刑事訴訟法》修改中的若干問題[J];法學;2011年09期

6 陳光中,張小玲;論非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則在我國的適用[J];政治與法律;2005年01期

7 何家弘;;中國式沉默權制度之我見——以“美國式”為參照[J];政法論壇;2013年01期

8 陳衛(wèi)東;;人民檢察院適用非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則若干問題的思考[J];國家檢察官學院學報;2013年01期

9 龍宗智;;我國非法口供排除的“痛苦規(guī)則”及相關問題[J];政法論壇;2013年05期

，

本文編號：1462397