【摘要】：FOB貿(mào)易屬于是我國對外貿(mào)易中常用的貿(mào)易方式,由于FOB術(shù)語的特殊性,FOB賣方處于較特殊的地位,在國際貿(mào)易實踐中對FOB賣方的保護處于混亂和不完善狀態(tài)。由于我國是出口大國,在國際貿(mào)易中常常扮演FOB賣方的角色,所以我們有必要理清思路,完善對FOB賣方的保護,也更好的在國際貿(mào)易中保護我國出口方的利益。對FOB賣方的保護可以有很多方式,由于對FOB賣方的訴權(quán)沒有統(tǒng)一的認(rèn)識,也沒有形成系統(tǒng)的保護機制,故本文對FOB賣方的訴權(quán)問題進行了分析和整理,希冀FOB賣方訴權(quán)問題變得清晰和容易操作,在海商法修改的大背景下,提出自己對FOB賣方訴權(quán)問題的構(gòu)建建議。 本文一共分為四章,主要針對實務(wù)中FOB賣方的不利地位,通過對比和理論探討分析了其行使訴權(quán)的具體情況和建議,具體如下： 本文第一章簡單介紹了民事訴訟中訴權(quán)的涵義、簡單的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r,我國對FOB賣方訴權(quán)的理論和實踐現(xiàn)狀、通過分析得出應(yīng)賦予FOB賣方訴權(quán)的結(jié)論。分析了FOB賣方訴權(quán)存在的合理性和正當(dāng)性。 第二、三章是文章的主體部分,是作者對FOB賣方訴權(quán)機制構(gòu)建的設(shè)想和分析,希冀能理順FOB賣方訴權(quán)問題的思路,更好地保證FOB賣方行使訴權(quán),主要探討了FOB賣方在不同角色時其訴權(quán)問題。第二章探討了FOB賣方是法定托運人時的訴權(quán)；第三章探討了賣方是提單持有人時的訴權(quán)。這一部分主要內(nèi)容是探討FOB賣方如何行使訴權(quán)以保護自己在貿(mào)易中處于的不利地位,并對其具體行使的訴權(quán)性質(zhì)有所分析。 文章的最后一章是針對我國對FOB賣方訴權(quán)問題的現(xiàn)狀,提出了對此問題的立法建議。這只是筆者的粗淺看法,殷切希望能得到學(xué)術(shù)界專業(yè)人士指正。
[Abstract]:FOB trade is a common trade mode in foreign trade of our country. Because of the particularity of FOB term, FOB seller is in a special position, and the protection of FOB seller is in confusion and imperfection in international trade practice. As China is a big exporter and often plays the role of FOB seller in international trade, it is necessary for us to clarify our thinking, perfect the protection of FOB seller, and better protect the interests of our export party in international trade. There are many ways to protect the FOB seller. Since there is no unified understanding of the FOB seller's right of action and no systematic protection mechanism, this paper analyzes and arranges the problem of the FOB seller's right of action. It is hoped that the issue of FOB seller's right of action will become clear and easy to operate. Under the background of the modification of maritime law, the author puts forward his own suggestions on the construction of FOB seller's right of action. This article is divided into four chapters, mainly aimed at the disadvantage of FOB seller in practice, through comparison and theoretical analysis of the specific situation and suggestions for the exercise of the right of action. The main contents are as follows: the first chapter briefly introduces the meaning of the right of action in civil action, the simple development, the theory and practice of the FOB seller's right of action in our country, and draws the conclusion that the seller's right of action should be given to the FOB through the analysis. This paper analyzes the rationality and legitimacy of the existence of FOB seller's right of action. Second, the third chapter is the main part of the article, which is the author's assumption and analysis of the construction of FOB seller's right of action mechanism, hoping to straighten out the ideas of FOB seller's right of action, and better ensure the FOB seller to exercise the right of action. This paper mainly discusses the litigation rights of FOB sellers in different roles. The second chapter discusses the right of action when the FOB seller is the legal shipper, and the third chapter discusses the right of action when the seller is the holder of the bill of lading. The main content of this part is to discuss how the FOB seller exercises the right of action in order to protect his disadvantageous position in the trade, and analyzes the nature of the specific right of action exercised by the seller. In the last chapter, the author puts forward some legislative suggestions on the problem of FOB seller's right of action. This is only the author's superficial view, eager to get academic professionals pointed out.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.294

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 龐艷卿;FOB合同項下賣方權(quán)利探討[J];重慶郵電學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年02期

2 江波;;FOB術(shù)語下出口合同的風(fēng)險與防范[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟;2008年12期

3 谷浩;FOB術(shù)語下的賣方對承運人索賠問題探析[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)實務(wù);2000年09期

4 林瑞云;提單托運人訴權(quán)探討[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)實務(wù);2003年04期

5 李晶;違約對貨物風(fēng)險轉(zhuǎn)移的影響——UCC與CISG相關(guān)條款對比分析[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)實務(wù);2003年05期

6 馬得懿;;FOB條件下賣方風(fēng)險問題研究——以托運人制度為視角[J];法商研究;2008年04期

7 王麗;趙偉麗;;FOB條件下托運人的認(rèn)定[J];法制與社會;2008年30期

8 袁曉娜;出口商慎重使用FOB出口[J];國際市場;2002年08期

9 楚風(fēng)華;;FOB價格條件下托運人的認(rèn)定[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年04期

10 祁長生;;FOB貿(mào)易術(shù)語下賣方如何規(guī)避風(fēng)險[J];黑龍江對外經(jīng)貿(mào);2006年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張麗敏;國際海上貨物運輸合同下的訴權(quán)問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2004年

2 何川;國際海上貨物運輸合同項下訴權(quán)問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2005年

3 孫永剛;論FOB術(shù)語下賣方在海上貨物運輸中的法律地位[D];上海海事大學(xué);2006年

4 黃建峰;國際海上貨物運輸法律關(guān)系下貨方訴權(quán)制度比較研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：2302772