【摘要】： 《鹿特丹規(guī)則》已于2009年9月23日在荷蘭鹿特丹舉行簽字儀式,而截至12月31日,共有21個(gè)國家簽署了這一規(guī)則,根據(jù)聯(lián)合國貿(mào)易法委員會(huì)《鹿特丹規(guī)則》須有20個(gè)成員國簽約,并提交核準(zhǔn)書一年之后方正式生效的規(guī)定,其將來必將對(duì)我國產(chǎn)生巨大影響,即使其未在我國生效,其中的一些條款也將對(duì)我國航運(yùn)立法產(chǎn)生深遠(yuǎn)影響。在此種情況下,作者比較國際公約與各個(gè)國內(nèi)法有關(guān)危險(xiǎn)貨物運(yùn)輸部分內(nèi)容的不同,以期為完善我國《海商法》盡綿薄之力。 本文第一章介紹關(guān)于國際公約、我國國內(nèi)法以及其他具有典型意義的國家的國內(nèi)法關(guān)于危險(xiǎn)貨物運(yùn)輸?shù)挠嘘P(guān)規(guī)定。以及現(xiàn)行的危險(xiǎn)貨物的定義方式,對(duì)其進(jìn)行比較,針對(duì)現(xiàn)代航運(yùn)業(yè)的發(fā)展總結(jié)適合現(xiàn)在社會(huì)的航運(yùn)發(fā)展的定義方式,提出區(qū)分航運(yùn)階段對(duì)危險(xiǎn)貨物進(jìn)行定義的設(shè)想。 第二章對(duì)托運(yùn)人的權(quán)利義務(wù)進(jìn)行比較。著重分析論述托運(yùn)人通知義務(wù)的履行時(shí)間、履行方式、以及履行不當(dāng)?shù)暮蠊�。建議傳統(tǒng)意義上托運(yùn)人應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)的部分義務(wù)可以協(xié)議由承運(yùn)人履行的設(shè)想。 第三章對(duì)承運(yùn)人的權(quán)利義務(wù)進(jìn)行比較,重點(diǎn)著眼于承運(yùn)人的危險(xiǎn)貨物處置權(quán),比較各個(gè)法規(guī)的不同規(guī)定,結(jié)合實(shí)踐,得出適合我國實(shí)際的我規(guī)定方式。 第四章針對(duì)無船承運(yùn)人在海上危險(xiǎn)貨物運(yùn)輸法律關(guān)系中的兩面性對(duì)其進(jìn)行分析。 第五章根據(jù)前文的分析,對(duì)我國《海商法》的修改提出立法建議。 本文不期另創(chuàng)新意,因?yàn)楣P者一直走在前人開辟的路上,撰寫過程中亦始終苦惱于實(shí)務(wù)知識(shí)的匱乏,惟希望閉門造車的一點(diǎn)小小設(shè)想,亦能夠起到拋磚引玉的功用,內(nèi)容如有謬誤失當(dāng)之處,尚祈不吝指正為禱。
[Abstract]:The Rotterdam rules were signed in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on 23 September 2009, and as at 31 December 2009, 21 States had signed the rule, In accordance with the provisions of the United Nations Commission on Trade Law Rotterdam rules, which require 20 member States to sign a treaty and submit their approval one year after its formal entry into force, it will certainly have a significant impact on our country in the future, even if it does not enter into force in our country, Some of the provisions will also have a profound impact on China's shipping legislation. In this case, the author compares the differences between international conventions and domestic laws concerning the transport of dangerous goods in order to contribute to the perfection of China's Maritime Law. The first chapter of this paper introduces the relevant provisions on the transport of dangerous goods concerning international conventions, domestic laws of China and other typical countries. Compared with the current definition mode of dangerous goods, aiming at the development of modern shipping industry, this paper sums up the definition mode suitable for the development of shipping in the present society, and puts forward the idea of distinguishing the stages of shipping for the definition of dangerous goods. Chapter two compares the rights and obligations of shippers. This paper mainly discusses the time, mode and consequence of the shipper's notice obligation. It is suggested that part of the shipper's obligations should be agreed to be performed by the carrier in the traditional sense. The third chapter compares the rights and obligations of the carrier, focusing on the carrier's right to dispose of dangerous goods, comparing the different provisions of the various laws and regulations, combined with the practice, to obtain a suitable for the actual situation of our country. The fourth chapter analyzes the two sides of the legal relationship of NVOCC in the carriage of dangerous goods by sea. Chapter five, according to the above analysis, puts forward legislative suggestions on the amendment of Maritime Law of our country. This article will not create new ideas, because the author has been walking on the road opened up by his predecessors. In the process of writing, he has always been troubled by the lack of practical knowledge, but he hopes that a little bit of imagination, which is built behind closed doors, can also serve as a source of brick and jade. If there is any falsehood or error in the content, I pray for your advice and correction.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D996.19;D922.294

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張婉婷;論海上危險(xiǎn)貨物運(yùn)輸中托運(yùn)人的法律責(zé)任[D];大連海事大學(xué);2012年

2 尚智霞;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》對(duì)國際海運(yùn)業(yè)承運(yùn)人義務(wù)重大變革之研究[D];河南大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2299858