【摘要】： 法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的核心思想在于,所有法律活動(dòng),包括一切立法和司法以及整個(gè)法律制度事實(shí)上是在發(fā)揮著分配稀缺資源的作用,因此,所有法律活動(dòng)都要以資源的有效配置和利用——即效率最大化為目的,所有的法律活動(dòng)都可以用經(jīng)濟(jì)的方法來分析和指導(dǎo)。法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的產(chǎn)生為我們提供了一個(gè)與傳統(tǒng)法學(xué)思維不同的研究方向。從理論上講,凡是理性的東西都可以用經(jīng)濟(jì)分析的方法來加以分析和解釋。以波斯納為代表的法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家將經(jīng)濟(jì)分析方法幾乎應(yīng)用到了所有的法律和法學(xué)領(lǐng)域,在過去四十年間取得了巨大的成功。票據(jù)法律制度,作為商法的重要組成部分,該法中的很多原理和規(guī)范都體現(xiàn)著其對效率或效益的孜孜追求。因此,從經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的角度來分析和研究票據(jù)法律制度,這是其作為商法之一的必然要求。本文以馬克思主義經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、古典經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、新古典經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、主流法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中的一些基本概念和原理為分析工具,在對票據(jù)法律制度經(jīng)濟(jì)分析的必要性和可行性進(jìn)行闡述的基礎(chǔ)上,分別對票據(jù)行為法律制度、票據(jù)權(quán)利法律制度和票據(jù)責(zé)任法律制度進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析,試圖探尋出隱藏在它們背后的經(jīng)濟(jì)邏輯,尋找出那些不符合經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)原理的票據(jù)法律制度,并結(jié)合中國的實(shí)際,對中國票據(jù)法律制度的立法現(xiàn)狀及存在的問題進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析,提出了既符合經(jīng)濟(jì)邏輯、又符合國際通行做法的修改建議。
[Abstract]:The core idea of law and economics is that all legal activities, including all legislation and justice, as well as the legal system as a whole, actually play a role in allocating scarce resources. All legal activities should aim at the effective allocation and utilization of resources, that is, the maximization of efficiency, and all legal activities can be analyzed and guided by economic methods. The emergence of law and economics provides us with a different research direction from the traditional legal thinking. In theory, everything rational can be analyzed and explained by economic analysis. Legal economists, represented by Posner, have applied economic analysis to almost all fields of law and law, and have achieved great success in the past 40 years. Bill legal system, as an important part of commercial law, many principles and norms of this law embody its pursuit of efficiency or benefit. Therefore, it is an inevitable requirement of commercial law to analyze and study the legal system of bill from the angle of economics. This paper takes some basic concepts and principles in Marxist economics, classical economics, neoclassical economics, institutional economics and mainstream law and economics as analytical tools. On the basis of expounding the necessity and feasibility of the economic analysis of the bill legal system, this paper makes a systematic economic analysis on the bill act legal system, the bill right legal system and the bill liability legal system, respectively. This paper tries to find out the economic logic hidden behind them, to find out the legal system of bill that does not accord with the principle of economics, and to make an empirical analysis of the current legislative situation and existing problems of the legal system of bill in China in combination with the reality of China. The paper puts forward some suggestions to amend the system, which accord with both economic logic and international common practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D922.287

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李欣銘;;經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)視角下的我國公司資本制度[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年09期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 馬得懿;海上貨物運(yùn)輸法強(qiáng)制性體制論[D];大連海事大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 凌潤斐;空白支票法律制度的法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[D];華東政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：2216113