論上市公司社會責(zé)任及實現(xiàn)機制
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-29 20:09
【摘要】： 所謂公司社會責(zé)任,是指公司在謀求股東利益最大化之外所負(fù)有維護(hù)和增進(jìn)社會利益的義務(wù)。公司社會責(zé)任是當(dāng)今世界各國公司經(jīng)營者、股東、社會各界以及公司法學(xué)者、立法者關(guān)注的熱點問題。從外部看,無論是由管理學(xué)、經(jīng)營學(xué)以及經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué),還是社會心理學(xué)、社會學(xué)以及倫理學(xué),公司社會責(zé)任問題的研究都是熱點。從內(nèi)部看,公司法一直是商法乃至私法的重中之重,對于公司社會責(zé)任的研究不僅是闡釋公司原理的要求,也是私法哲學(xué)的一個熱點。此外,公司社會責(zé)任還是傳統(tǒng)公司法理論在公司社會實踐中需要回應(yīng)的一個新課題。 本文對社會責(zé)任思想以及上市公司在社會責(zé)任方面存在的一些問題做了些許研究與歸納,希望對推動上市公司社會責(zé)任的履行有所幫助。除了引言與結(jié)語外,文章主要從三個章節(jié)對這一問題展開論述。 第一部分對公司社會責(zé)任思想的發(fā)展歷史進(jìn)行了梳理。從公司社會責(zé)任思想產(chǎn)生的背景及主要理論可以看出,公司社會責(zé)任思想的出現(xiàn)是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的必然結(jié)果,公司在為社會經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展做出了歷史性貢獻(xiàn)的同時,理論界也開始對這一制度所帶來的負(fù)面效應(yīng)進(jìn)行理論反思。同時,介紹了不同歷史時期對有關(guān)公司社會責(zé)任理論中具有代表性的幾種觀點。 第二部分從現(xiàn)代公司理論對公司社會責(zé)任的正當(dāng)性進(jìn)行了分析,并闡述了筆者對于這一理論的認(rèn)識。主要從公司的契約性質(zhì)、所有權(quán)分配、責(zé)任承擔(dān)三方面闡述公司社會責(zé)任理論的正當(dāng)性。同時強調(diào)社會責(zé)任理論是有其時代背景,中國引入這一法律制度要區(qū)別對待。 第三部分是本文的關(guān)鍵。重點論述了上市公司履行社會責(zé)任存在的問題及實現(xiàn)機制,著重闡述了上市公司在員工權(quán)益保護(hù)、消費者利益、債權(quán)人的權(quán)益、環(huán)境以及公益事業(yè)五方面存在的問題,以及筆者提供的一些改進(jìn)意見。
[Abstract]:The so-called corporate social responsibility refers to the obligation of the company to safeguard and promote the social interests in addition to the maximization of shareholders' interests. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a hot issue concerned by corporate managers, shareholders, social circles, corporate law scholars and legislators in the world. From the external point of view, whether by management, business and economics, social psychology, sociology and ethics, corporate social responsibility is a hot topic. From the internal point of view, corporate law has always been the most important part of commercial law and even private law. The study of corporate social responsibility is not only the requirement of explaining the principle of company, but also a hot spot of private law philosophy. In addition, corporate social responsibility is still a new topic that the traditional corporate law theory needs to respond to in corporate social practice. This paper makes some research and induction on the idea of social responsibility and some problems existing in the social responsibility of listed companies, hoping to help to promote the implementation of social responsibility of listed companies. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the article mainly discusses this issue from three chapters. The first part combs the development history of corporate social responsibility. From the background and main theory of corporate social responsibility, we can see that the emergence of corporate social responsibility is the inevitable result of economic development, while the company has made historical contributions to the social and economic development. The theorists also began to reflect on the negative effects of this system. At the same time, it introduces several representative views on the theory of corporate social responsibility in different historical periods. The second part analyzes the legitimacy of corporate social responsibility from modern corporate theory, and expounds the author's understanding of this theory. This paper expounds the legitimacy of corporate social responsibility theory from three aspects: contract nature, ownership distribution and responsibility assumption. At the same time, it emphasizes that the theory of social responsibility has its own background. The third part is the key of this paper. The problems and realization mechanism of social responsibility of listed companies are discussed, and the problems of employee rights protection, consumer interests, creditors' rights and interests, environment and public welfare undertakings are emphasized. And the author provides some suggestions for improvement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D922.291.91
本文編號：2212287
[Abstract]:The so-called corporate social responsibility refers to the obligation of the company to safeguard and promote the social interests in addition to the maximization of shareholders' interests. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a hot issue concerned by corporate managers, shareholders, social circles, corporate law scholars and legislators in the world. From the external point of view, whether by management, business and economics, social psychology, sociology and ethics, corporate social responsibility is a hot topic. From the internal point of view, corporate law has always been the most important part of commercial law and even private law. The study of corporate social responsibility is not only the requirement of explaining the principle of company, but also a hot spot of private law philosophy. In addition, corporate social responsibility is still a new topic that the traditional corporate law theory needs to respond to in corporate social practice. This paper makes some research and induction on the idea of social responsibility and some problems existing in the social responsibility of listed companies, hoping to help to promote the implementation of social responsibility of listed companies. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the article mainly discusses this issue from three chapters. The first part combs the development history of corporate social responsibility. From the background and main theory of corporate social responsibility, we can see that the emergence of corporate social responsibility is the inevitable result of economic development, while the company has made historical contributions to the social and economic development. The theorists also began to reflect on the negative effects of this system. At the same time, it introduces several representative views on the theory of corporate social responsibility in different historical periods. The second part analyzes the legitimacy of corporate social responsibility from modern corporate theory, and expounds the author's understanding of this theory. This paper expounds the legitimacy of corporate social responsibility theory from three aspects: contract nature, ownership distribution and responsibility assumption. At the same time, it emphasizes that the theory of social responsibility has its own background. The third part is the key of this paper. The problems and realization mechanism of social responsibility of listed companies are discussed, and the problems of employee rights protection, consumer interests, creditors' rights and interests, environment and public welfare undertakings are emphasized. And the author provides some suggestions for improvement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D922.291.91
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條
1 李志強;;關(guān)于我國破產(chǎn)重整計劃批準(zhǔn)制度的思考——以債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)為中心[J];北方法學(xué);2008年03期
2 楊繼;;公司環(huán)境責(zé)任之再思考——松花江水污染事件的啟示[J];法學(xué)評論;2007年01期
3 羅培新;;論公司捐贈的司法政策——從萬科捐贈風(fēng)波談起[J];法學(xué);2008年12期
4 王順生;;公司法中職工權(quán)益保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀研究[J];湖南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年08期
5 徐江彬;;關(guān)于我國破產(chǎn)債權(quán)人問題的探討[J];江西社會科學(xué);2006年11期
6 楊宏;程綠清;;公司社會責(zé)任的實現(xiàn)形式與選擇[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2002年03期
7 劉俊海;公司社會責(zé)任與和諧消費環(huán)境的營造[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年04期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 記者 孫秀艷;[N];人民日報;2005年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 王艷梅;公司社會責(zé)任的法理學(xué)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2005年
2 楊秋波;上市公司破產(chǎn)選擇行為及其效應(yīng)研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2008年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 劉晶晶;論公司社會責(zé)任[D];中國政法大學(xué);2005年
2 程海燕;公司社會責(zé)任的內(nèi)涵界定與正當(dāng)性探析[D];山東大學(xué);2006年
，本文編號：2212287
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/sflw/2212287.html
