【摘要】：貨物在目的港進(jìn)行交付是承運(yùn)人履行海上貨物運(yùn)輸?shù)淖詈笠粋�(gè)環(huán)節(jié)。由于海上運(yùn)輸所具有的特殊風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，導(dǎo)致實(shí)踐中在這一環(huán)節(jié)上出現(xiàn)諸多問(wèn)題，如貨物的遲延交付、無(wú)單放貨、無(wú)人提貨等等。造成這些問(wèn)題的原因有些是由于承運(yùn)人在海上運(yùn)輸中遇見(jiàn)的特殊海上風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，有些則是由于承運(yùn)人沒(méi)有謹(jǐn)慎地甚至是存在過(guò)失地履行運(yùn)輸合同所致�？梢赃@么說(shuō)，海上運(yùn)輸中所有可能產(chǎn)生的問(wèn)題都集中體現(xiàn)于承運(yùn)人在目的港貨物交貨這一環(huán)節(jié)。然而，在交付環(huán)節(jié)產(chǎn)生的很多問(wèn)題往往得不到合理解決，導(dǎo)致糾紛的產(chǎn)生。探究這種現(xiàn)象存在的原因，是由于法律對(duì)承運(yùn)人交付環(huán)節(jié)沒(méi)有做出明確的規(guī)定，無(wú)論是以往的《海牙規(guī)則》、《維斯比規(guī)則》、或是我國(guó)的《海商法》都沒(méi)有給予清楚充分的規(guī)定，，有的甚至未曾涉及，這不能不說(shuō)是一個(gè)遺憾。筆者試圖通過(guò)本文對(duì)承運(yùn)人交付問(wèn)題的討論以引起對(duì)此問(wèn)題更多的關(guān)注。 本文在對(duì)三大公約及《海商法》對(duì)承運(yùn)人交付問(wèn)題的規(guī)定進(jìn)行分析的基礎(chǔ)上，試圖通過(guò)三大公約與《海商法》在承運(yùn)人的遲延交付及無(wú)單放貨的規(guī)定進(jìn)行比較、及與草案的最新規(guī)定進(jìn)行比較的過(guò)程中，發(fā)現(xiàn)各自的優(yōu)劣之處，總結(jié)歸納出對(duì)《海商法》的修改建議。 本文共有五章。第一章承運(yùn)人交貨責(zé)任概述，具體包括交付行為的性質(zhì)、“交付”的含義；第二章遲延交付問(wèn)題，具體包括三大公約及《海商法》對(duì)遲延交付的規(guī)定、遲延交付問(wèn)題在實(shí)踐與理論中存在的分歧及修改建議；第三章無(wú)單放貨，具體包括無(wú)單放貨問(wèn)題在理論與實(shí)踐上存在的分歧、對(duì)無(wú)單放貨問(wèn)題的定性及無(wú)單放貨產(chǎn)生的責(zé)任；第四章草案的相關(guān)規(guī)定，具體包括草案的制定背景、草案對(duì)遲延交付與無(wú)單放貨的相關(guān)規(guī)定、對(duì)草案的評(píng)價(jià)及對(duì)我國(guó)立法的借鑒意義；第五章結(jié)論。
[Abstract]:Delivery of goods at the port of destination is the last link for the carrier to carry out the carriage of goods by sea. Due to the special risks of carriage by sea, there are many problems in practice, such as delayed delivery of goods, delivery without bills of lading, no delivery of goods and so on. Some of the Special Maritime risks encountered in the carriage of goods by sea are due to the carrier's failure to perform the contract of carriage prudently or even negligently. It can be said that the problems that may arise in the carriage of goods by sea are concentrated in the delivery of goods by the carrier at the port of destination. The reason for the existence of this phenomenon is that the law has not made clear the delivery link of the carrier, whether in the past Hague Rules, Visby Rules, or China's Maritime Law has not given clear and sufficient provisions, and some have not even been involved, which can not be avoided. It is a pity. The author tries to arouse more attention to this problem by discussing the delivery of carrier.
Based on the analysis of the provisions of the three major conventions and the Maritime Code on the delivery of the carrier, this paper tries to compare the provisions of the three conventions with those of the Maritime Code on the delivery of the carrier's delay and delivery of the goods without a bill of lading, and finds out their respective advantages and disadvantages in the process of comparing them with the latest provisions of the draft. Amendments to the maritime code.
Chapter 1 is an overview of the carrier's liability for delivery, including the nature of the act of delivery and the meaning of "delivery"; Chapter 2 is about delayed delivery, including the provisions of the three major conventions and the Maritime Law on delayed delivery, the differences between the practice and the theory on delayed delivery and the suggestions for amendment; Chapter 3 is about delivery without bill of lading. Specifically, it includes the divergence between theory and Practice on delivery without B/L, the nature of delivery without B/L and the responsibility for delivery without B/L; the relevant provisions of the fourth draft, including the background of the draft, the relevant provisions of the draft on delayed delivery and delivery without B/L, the evaluation of the draft and the reference significance for our legislation. The fifth chapter is the conclusion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王威;FOB術(shù)語(yǔ)下無(wú)單放貨問(wèn)題研究[D];長(zhǎng)春工業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

本文編號(hào)：2211732